Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+KP4VP\s+and\s+WPX\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+KP4VP\s+and\s+WPX\s*$/: 23 ]

Total 23 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] KP4VP and WPX (score: 1): Author: cfmorris@bellsouth.net (Charles Morrison); Date: Sun Feb 9 21:42:53 2003; Did anyone manage to work him? I tried on frequency, I tried up, I tried down, I even spotted him a few times on the cluster maybe hoping he'd figure it out. Every band, he was deaf as a doornail. Th; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-02/msg00214.html (7,597 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] KP4VP and WPX (score: 1): Author: ki6dy@sbcglobal.net (ki6dy); Date: Sun Feb 9 23:58:34 2003; Called him about 5 times on three different occasions with the same result - nothing. He was strong here and I had the beam right on him. Bob (KI6DY) figure I'll 7:00.; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-02/msg00219.html (8,479 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] KP4VP and WPX (score: 1): Author: n4an@ala.net (Roy Dancy); Date: Mon Feb 10 11:13:00 2003; Good morning Bob et all, I think he was just being an ___hole. He has done this before and again in this contest. 73 y'all RoY N4AN result - tried in; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-02/msg00245.html (9,557 bytes)
4. [WriteLog] KP4VP and WPX (score: 1): Author: jeflanders@comcast.net (Jerry Flanders); Date: Mon Feb 10 11:39:32 2003; These new radios with combined RFGain + Squelch on _one_ knob can be tricky ;o) (Hint - rotation past half point changes to squelch mode on current popular ICOMs) Jerry W4UK; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-02/msg00248.html (9,755 bytes)
5. [WriteLog] KP4VP and WPX (score: 1): Author: w4lc@fuse.net (w4lc); Date: Mon Feb 10 12:18:36 2003; I worked him on 15M on Saturday at 1522UTC. He gave me a number of 035. Jim W4LC figure I'll 7:00.; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-02/msg00251.html (8,677 bytes)
6. [WriteLog] KP4VP and WPX (score: 1): Author: doncassel@compuserve.com (Don Cassel); Date: Mon Feb 10 12:47:11 2003; He was really strong here but would not answer my call. Tried several times. But that happened to me with a lot of stations that I thought should hear me so don't know what to make of that. Of course; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-02/msg00258.html (10,166 bytes)
7. [WriteLog] KP4VP and WPX (score: 1): Author: tombaugh@discoverynet.com (tombaugh); Date: Mon Feb 10 12:50:14 2003; I know we have him on 2 bands and missed him on a couple others. Seemed deaf at times.. but we weren't sure if he had such a pileup he couldn't print anything or maybe he had wide filters? I don't kn; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-02/msg00259.html (10,099 bytes)
8. [WriteLog] KP4VP and WPX (score: 1): Author: aa5au@bellsouth.net (Don Hill AA5AU); Date: Mon Feb 10 13:39:16 2003; Probably a better discussion for the RTTY Reflector, but I did manage to get him in the log on one band but it wasn't easy. He was getting piled on pretty good whenever I came upon him. It's obvious; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-02/msg00263.html (11,604 bytes)
9. [WriteLog] KP4VP and WPX (score: 1): Author: snichols@mvosprey.com (Scott Nichols); Date: Mon Feb 10 14:10:46 2003; I had 500 watts on him with a beam and he didn't answer me for the longest time...He was loud here too, with not a huge pileup...I was one of three stations calling him and he answered none of us...M; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-02/msg00265.html (11,893 bytes)
10. [WriteLog] KP4VP and WPX (score: 1): Author: k4sb@earthlink.net (K4SB); Date: Mon Feb 10 14:24:00 2003; I called him for about 10 mins, along with, I think W0ODL??? No response to either of us, and I could copy all calling, which was about 3. Now when you point a WIDE spaced 5 element beam at him and; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-02/msg00266.html (8,782 bytes)
11. [WriteLog] KP4VP and WPX (score: 1): Author: g3sjj@btinternet.com (G3SJJ); Date: Mon Feb 10 14:44:45 2003; Guys, this is not really the place for these kind of discussions. I find myself deleting a lot of postings to this Reflector which are not really appropriate, far more than on any of the other Reflec; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-02/msg00267.html (12,000 bytes)
12. [WriteLog] KP4VP and WPX (score: 1): Author: faunt@panix.com (Doug Faunt N6TQS +1-510-655-8604); Date: Mon Feb 10 15:11:48 2003; I called him for about 10 mins, along with, I think W0ODL??? No response to either of us, and I could copy all calling, which was about 3. Now when you point a WIDE spaced 5 element beam at him and h; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-02/msg00268.html (9,270 bytes)
13. [WriteLog] KP4VP and WPX (score: 1): Author: w7ti@dslextreme.com (Bill Turner); Date: Mon Feb 10 15:59:30 2003; _________________________________________________________ Sorry, I disagree. You can't really expect everyone to move to a different reflector just so you aren't inconvenienced. The thread *is* relat; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-02/msg00271.html (9,014 bytes)
14. [WriteLog] KP4VP and WPX (score: 1): Author: g3sjj@btinternet.com (G3SJJ); Date: Mon Feb 10 16:17:04 2003; Bill, that is just my point. You say ...The thread *is* related to RTTY contesting and that's what the people here are doing and that's why they're on this reflector.... This is the Writelog Contest; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-02/msg00272.html (9,836 bytes)
15. [WriteLog] KP4VP and WPX (score: 1): Author: ak8b@brightdsl.net (Bruce Ferry); Date: Mon Feb 10 16:21:14 2003; Last time I looked this was the WRITELOG reflector not the RTTY reflector. I also feel that this does NOT belong here. I'm interested in WRITELOG issues, not what RTTY contesters are having problems; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-02/msg00273.html (9,751 bytes)
16. [WriteLog] KP4VP and WPX (score: 1): Author: ww3s@zoominternet.net (WW3S); Date: Mon Feb 10 16:57:30 2003; I worked him but it was hard; not sure what he was using for TNC/radio/etc. but it seemed to me that if the station calling was in the clear, he came back to it. Perhaps he didn't have any rx filters; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-02/msg00276.html (10,637 bytes)
17. [WriteLog] KP4VP and WPX (score: 1): Author: w7ti@dslextreme.com (Bill Turner); Date: Mon Feb 10 17:50:55 2003; _________________________________________________________ Well, look again. WriteLog is primarily a RTTY program and that's why there are so many RTTY contesters here. If someone wanders a little off; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-02/msg00280.html (9,226 bytes)
18. [WriteLog] KP4VP and WPX (score: 1): Author: ak8b@brightdsl.net (Bruce Ferry); Date: Mon Feb 10 18:00:13 2003; No, WRITELOG is a contesting program. It just happens to do RTTY very well (from what I hear anyway). I do not currently do any RTTY so I don't care about the woes of the RTTY contesters. This thread; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-02/msg00281.html (9,984 bytes)
19. [WriteLog] KP4VP and WPX (score: 1): Author: jbrannig@optonline.net (Jim Brannigan); Date: Mon Feb 10 19:02:25 2003; I agree with Bruce. RTTY contest results and threads about who worked or didn't belong on the contest reflector, not here. As with any other QRM/QRN it makes it difficult to find the good stuff. (Pro; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-02/msg00287.html (11,028 bytes)
20. [WriteLog] KP4VP and WPX (score: 1): Author: bferry@brightdsl.net (Bruce Ferry); Date: Mon Feb 10 22:24:37 2003; Last time I looked this was the WRITELOG reflector not the RTTY reflector. I also feel that this does NOT belong here. I'm interested in WRITELOG issues, not what RTTY contesters are having problems; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-02/msg00306.html (8,841 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]