Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+MicroHam\s+USB\s+Interface\s+Problem\s+with\s+CW\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] MicroHam USB Interface Problem with CW (score: 1)
Author: "K3SV, Bill Gillenwater" <k3sv@direcway.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 19:45:34 -0400
Running XP and just installed the MicroHam USB interface to the FT1000MP. Are there any special things I should know about the "ports" setup in Writelog, and, do I connect the PTT line to the MP in a
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-09/msg00075.html (6,978 bytes)

2. Re: [WriteLog] MicroHam USB Interface Problem with CW (score: 1)
Author: Georgek5kg@aol.com
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 00:38:54 EDT
Running XP and just installed the MicroHam USB interface to the FT1000MP. Are there any special things I should know about the "ports" setup in Writelog, and, do I connect the PTT line to the MP in a
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-09/msg00076.html (9,419 bytes)

3. RE: [WriteLog] MicroHam USB Interface Problem with CW (score: 1)
Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 06:36:25 -0500
In addition to Bill's information, I put some information on CW and other information concerning the microHAM USB interface at: http://www.rttycontesting.com/microham/mk.htm 73, Don AA5AU --Original
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-09/msg00091.html (10,845 bytes)

4. Re: [WriteLog] MicroHam USB Interface Problem with CW (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 14:16:11 -0000
from a George I just got around to connecting up my Microkeyer but I'm confused. You say you're getting nice sounding CW with no stuttering. Did you have stuttering without MicroKeyer? If so, I don't
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-10/msg00091.html (7,895 bytes)

5. Re: [WriteLog] MicroHam USB Interface Problem with CW (score: 1)
Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 11:36:43 -0400
You are correct, Bob, in that Winkey doesn't process PC generated code. It would if it if was used with logging software that accepted paddle inputs, which WL doesn't. With WL, it's just working in p
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-10/msg00093.html (8,537 bytes)

6. Re: [WriteLog] MicroHam USB Interface Problem with CW (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 16:31:26 -0000
Thanks Blake. That's what I figured. I guess we need to convince Wayne to support the MicroKeyer and WinKey. I'm sure there must be a significant demand for this. Wayne and Ron's Multi-Keyer works ju
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-10/msg00094.html (10,814 bytes)

7. Re: [WriteLog] MicroHam USB Interface Problem with CW (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 09:45:49 -0700
_________________________________________________________ I second the motion. WinKey is a remarkable and inexpensive piece of equipment. It is already supported by N1MM Logger. Adding it to WriteLog
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-10/msg00095.html (7,739 bytes)

8. Re: [WriteLog] MicroHam USB Interface Problem with CW (score: 1)
Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 15:16:12 -0400
Yep. The list of hardware and software using WinKey is quite long, and growing. The sample code and .dll's are available from K1EL. The most important feature of WinKey IMO is lower resource consumpt
/archives//html/WriteLog/2004-10/msg00098.html (8,683 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu