Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+NAQP\s+RTTY\s+SriteLog\s+Formatting\s+Errors\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] NAQP RTTY SriteLog Formatting Errors (score: 1)
Author: "Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 05:55:24 -0400
I received this: "I've received several NAQP RTTY logs generated by WriteLog as Cabrillo 3.0 formatted logs that are missing required header fields. The CATEGORY-POWER: field is missing." from WA7BNM
/archives//html/WriteLog/2009-07/msg00091.html (7,048 bytes)

2. Re: [WriteLog] NAQP RTTY SriteLog Formatting Errors (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 09:57:33 -0400
Out of curiosity, since NAQP has only one power class - 100 W and less - why should the robot require the "CATEGORY-POWER" field? Further, if "CATEGORY-POWER" is included, why would it not be LOW con
/archives//html/WriteLog/2009-07/msg00093.html (8,832 bytes)

3. Re: [WriteLog] NAQP RTTY SriteLog Formatting Errors (score: 1)
Author: Charles Miller <n6kw@seanet.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:59:44 +0000
Under item 15 in the NAQP Rules it states that your log header must state the power. LOW indicates 100w or less, QRP indicates 5w or less. HIGH makes it a check log. So I guess they really have two p
/archives//html/WriteLog/2009-07/msg00094.html (9,866 bytes)

4. Re: [WriteLog] NAQP RTTY SriteLog Formatting Errors (score: 1)
Author: Brian <shortckts@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 09:20:00 -0700
Just before NAQP, I upgraded my WL to the latest version and my log came out fine. Unfortunately, there was a 2 hour power outage and there was lightning in the area for much longer than that. In the
/archives//html/WriteLog/2009-07/msg00095.html (8,166 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu