Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+NEQP\s+Module\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+NEQP\s+Module\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] NEQP module (score: 1): Author: steveac@charter.net (Steve); Date: Sat May 3 23:11:16 2003; I'm using N9OH's NEQP module with WriteLog. The file name is NGQP_WL_1.0.0.9.exe, got it from his web site today. But the dupe function isn't working. If I enter a call in the entry window that I hav; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-05/msg00028.html (6,601 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] NEQP module (score: 1): Author: sjwoodr@xnet.com (Steve Woodruff); Date: Sun May 4 09:11:42 2003; Steve - When you enter the dupe station, does the RCVD field correctly show the "same" 5-char county name as the "old" contact? I did a quick test and for some reason its only throwing up the first 4; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-05/msg00031.html (7,787 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] NEQP Module (score: 1): Author: NB1B@attbi.com (NB1B); Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 18:59:20 -0400; If anyone is doing a WL module for NEQP, I would volunteer to be a Beta Tester, for either the In-NE or the Out-NE modules. I plan to put in a major effort from NE so am looking forward to getting al; /archives//html/WriteLog/2002-04/msg00114.html (6,359 bytes)
4. [WriteLog] NEQP Module (score: 1): Author: "Rick Davenport" <ki1g@cox.net>; Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 14:47:50 -0400; NEQP is 2 weeks away and I was testing my software setup, The module does not like RTTY contacts, calls them bad when they should be treated as a CW contact as far as scoring/duping band modes. Tnx,; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-04/msg00144.html (6,518 bytes)
5. [WriteLog] NEQP module (score: 1): Author: "Jamie Dupree" <ns3t@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 19:59:04 -0400; At least on my computer this weekend, the calls in the super check partial window would be the color black instead of green if they were okay to work. Anyone else see that? As for the two QSO parties; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-05/msg00007.html (7,366 bytes)
6. Re: [WriteLog] NEQP module (score: 1): Author: Steve Moore AI9T <sjmmoore@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 02 May 2004 19:13:10 -0500; Jamie I worked the ARI DX Contest,,"RTTY Only" The super check partial worked fine on my PC as it has in the past. -- 73 Steve AI9T http://mysite.verizon.net/res6tjof/ai9t/ QSL via eQSL.cc and LOTW J; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-05/msg00008.html (8,217 bytes)
7. RE: [WriteLog] NEQP module (score: 1): Author: "Don Cassel" <doncassel@compuserve.com>; Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 20:46:14 -0400; Yes, I had the same thing happen here with the super check partial window. Don VE3XD _______________________________________________ WriteLog mailing list WriteLog@contesting.com http://lists.contest; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-05/msg00009.html (8,421 bytes)
8. [WriteLog] NEQP module (score: 1): Author: "Jamie Dupree" <ns3t@arrl.net>; Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 22:17:36 -0400; Maybe the super check partial color for the NEQP could be corrected before next year's running. Also on the to-do-list - take out RTTY from the check call and mult list for the Florida QSO Party modu; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-05/msg00010.html (7,385 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]