Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Packet\s+etc\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Packet\s+etc\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Packet etc (score: 1): Author: "Les, VA7LC" <VA7LC@shaw.ca>; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:54:03 -0800; I think it's about time we got rid of packet, DX clusters, partial check databases etc. etc. and other crutches and became REAL radio operators. Les, VA7LC ___________________________________________; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-02/msg00230.html (6,302 bytes)
2. Re: [WriteLog] Packet etc (score: 1): Author: KI9A@aol.com; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 19:11:18 EST; I think it's about time we got rid of packet, DX clusters, partial check databases etc. etc. and other crutches and became REAL radio operators. THATS RIGHT! While we are at it, lets get rid of tower; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-02/msg00231.html (7,259 bytes)
3. Re: [WriteLog] Packet etc (score: 1): Author: "Les, VA7LC" <VA7LC@shaw.ca>; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:52:34 -0800; Sarcasm, the lowest form of wit. Les, VA7LC ' -- Original Message -- From: KI9A@aol.com To: VA7LC@shaw.ca Cc: writelog@contesting.com Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 4:11 PM Subject: Re: [WriteLog]; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-02/msg00232.html (7,222 bytes)
4. Re: [WriteLog] Packet etc (score: 1): Author: KI9A@aol.com; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 20:08:18 EST; Sarcasm, the lowest form of wit. Ah, but effective form of wit. But, what I said is true, sarcastic or not, why don't we do away with tall towers & high power, if, indeed folks such as Les want to do; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-02/msg00233.html (7,308 bytes)
5. Re: [WriteLog] Packet etc (score: 1): Author: "Les, VA7LC" <VA7LC@shaw.ca>; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:30:12 -0800; Well I suppose we could sit on a frequency and CQ for 48 hours. But, what I said is true, sarcastic or not, why don't we do away with tall towers & high power, if, indeed folks such as Les want to do; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-02/msg00234.html (7,283 bytes)
6. Re: [WriteLog] Packet etc (score: 1): Author: Eric Hilding <dx35@hilding.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:38:00 -0800; As an almost-not-quite-there-yet packet Newbie, I too yearn for the "good old days" of contesting. However, methinks packet etc. is here to stay...never to go away. Sooooo we need to pee or get off t; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-02/msg00235.html (7,130 bytes)
7. Re: [WriteLog] Packet etc (score: 1): Author: "Blake M." <n4gi@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 06:31:56 -0500; I think a more obtainable goal would be the legalization of self spotting. Think of the fun. It would work better for me. I could care less about seeing where mults are, I can find them on my own. Ho; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-02/msg00242.html (8,211 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]