- 1. [WriteLog] SO2R.. sort of (score: 1)
- Author: "Rick Mintz" <Rmintz@Rochester.rr.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:06:55 -0400
- Hi gang, I can't find a specific reference to this in the WL manual so here goes.... We want to set up a SO2R arrangement for contesting but using two operators, two radios, two sets of antennas and
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2006-09/msg00053.html (7,277 bytes)
- 2. Re: [WriteLog] SO2R.. sort of (score: 1)
- Author: "Bruce Meier" <bemeier@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:42:45 -0400
- Rick, Sounds interesting...but - the S in SO2R is for SINGLE operator. What you are setting up is closer to a multi-two with lockouts. I have never heard of this, nor does it comply with SINGLE OP cl
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2006-09/msg00055.html (8,236 bytes)
- 3. Re: [WriteLog] SO2R.. sort of (score: 1)
- Author: Georgek5kg@aol.com
- Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:57:05 EDT
- We want to set up a SO2R arrangement for contesting but using two operators, two radios, two sets of antennas and two networked computers. Each radio needs to be able to lock out the other from trans
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2006-09/msg00056.html (7,961 bytes)
- 4. Re: [WriteLog] SO2R.. sort of (score: 1)
- Author: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>
- Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 16:27:12 +0000
- I operate a similar hardware setup - networked computers, etc. I control TX/RX manually, but I have tried the lockouts and they work OK. I forget which pulldown tab they are on. You have two options.
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2006-09/msg00057.html (8,329 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu