Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+SO2R\s+vs\s+SO1R\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+SO2R\s+vs\s+SO1R\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1): Author: "Dick, K2ZR" <k2zr@arrl.net>; Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 07:56:06 -0500; Hi Mike, "as it stands now...the playing field is severely tilted....and the battles for the top are ALWAYS buy the single ops running 2 or more rigs. That's just fact." The operative phrase is the p; /archives//html/WriteLog/2015-01/msg00063.html (8,807 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1): Author: W2GR--- via WriteLog <writelog@contesting.com>; Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 17:47:31 -0500; Hi John, I am just curious ...in what contest ..in what category ...and year have you won in the SO cat where SO2R contestants were operating?...?...This is not to get into any pissing match...but ju; /archives//html/WriteLog/2015-01/msg00069.html (12,524 bytes)
3. Re: [WriteLog] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 22:25:08 -0500; To some degree there already is a SO1R category in one major contest. CQWW Classic allows only one transceiver. You can also operate single band and be very competitive with one radio in any contest.; /archives//html/WriteLog/2015-01/msg00076.html (14,510 bytes)
4. Re: [WriteLog] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1): Author: Mike W2GR via WriteLog <writelog@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 06:23:39 -0500; Ok...tks John I get it now. I'm gonna have to start hanging around with Dennis Rodman...so the next time he goes to visit the little tyrant...I'll make sure he does it during the CQWW RTTY. ; oD That; /archives//html/WriteLog/2015-01/msg00077.html (15,843 bytes)
5. Re: [WriteLog] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1): Author: Mike W2GR via WriteLog <writelog@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 08:35:46 -0500; Thanks John, That's why I and many others feel that sponsors of all contests should install a separate category for SO2R to at least level the playing field a bit. That would let the 2R top dogs bat; /archives//html/WriteLog/2015-01/msg00078.html (17,256 bytes)
6. [WriteLog] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1): Author: Paul Young <k1xm@k1xm.org>; Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 22:37:44 -0500; Please don't take this wrong, but I subscribe to the WriteLog reflector because I'm interested in WriteLog. The discussion about SO2R and new contest categories has nothing to do with WriteLog. Pleas; /archives//html/WriteLog/2015-01/msg00085.html (7,940 bytes)
7. Re: [WriteLog] SO2R vs SO1R (score: 1): Author: "Bill Parry" <bparry@rgv.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 23:06:13 -0600; I agree, thank you Paul. Take this to the appropriate venue! I am tired of hitting the delete button. Bill W5VX Please don't take this wrong, but I subscribe to the WriteLog reflector because I'm int; /archives//html/WriteLog/2015-01/msg00086.html (8,934 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]