Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Serial\s+numbers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Serial\s+numbers\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Serial Numbers (score: 1): Author: kelly@thejohnsons.ws (N6KJ); Date: Sat Aug 9 10:22:28 2003; The Writelog documentation says that if you set up a macro to do "%3" then it will send a serial number with "T" in place of leading 0's (ie. Serial Number 1 would be sent as TT1, not 001 or just 1).; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-08/msg00058.html (6,622 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] Serial Numbers (score: 1): Author: n5na@arrl.net (A. Sewell); Date: Sat Aug 9 10:52:29 2003; Do you have the cut numbers section set up in your ini file? From the help file: WRITELOG.INI [Cut-Numbers] This section contains the mapping for cut numbers for handing the %N command in CW transmis; /archives//html/WriteLog/2003-08/msg00059.html (7,366 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] serial numbers (score: 1): Author: na6e@home.com (NA6E); Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 09:05:21 -0700; I used writelog in a multi operation last weekend and noticed that the serial numbers were a little odd. Occasionally one number will be skipped and there were times when a single number was used twi; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-10/msg00012.html (6,786 bytes)
4. [WriteLog] Serial numbers (score: 1): Author: edlyn@california.com (Eddie Schneider); Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 12:57:54 -0800; 10 >times. Hmmmm, As official log checker for ARRL RTTY RU and CQWW WPX RTTY, I would become very suspicious of a log which indicated a lot of serial numbers that were the same. Also, see extracts fr; /archives//html/WriteLog/2001-01/msg00315.html (7,232 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]