Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Slow\s+Aurtomatic\s+Save\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Slow\s+Aurtomatic\s+Save\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Slow Aurtomatic Save (score: 1): Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green); Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 00:56:11 -0400; I thought I should report that AutoSave slows down pretty severely when the log gets big on a machine with a relatively slow hard drive. In WPX, I was using a four-year old Toshiba 100MHz Pentium not; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-06/msg00010.html (7,786 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] Slow Aurtomatic Save (score: 1): Author: oh2kw@pp.kolumbus.fi (Arto Liimatta); Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 19:44:23 +0300; Hi, I noticed the same. Especially if you had copied only part of the call, lets say 2KW of my OH2KW, and WL was sending out 2KW 599 00x, there was a long gap after 2KW and 599. The gap was unnoticab; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-06/msg00014.html (9,206 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] Slow Aurtomatic Save (score: 1): Author: dick.green@valley.net (Dick Green); Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2000 17:01:01 -0400; Arto, I did not have gaps between parts of the message. The delay came after the entire "TU WC1M" message was sent, and the length of the delay was strictly related to the size of the log. Your probl; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-06/msg00028.html (11,045 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]