Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Spam\s+Spots\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Spam\s+Spots\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Spam Spots (score: 1): Author: "AD8J" <ad8j.1@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 18:38:19 -0500; Too many spots this weekend didn't have the section information included. Guess we need a filter to ignore any spot during SS that doesn't have section info. John Getz, AD8J _________________________; /archives//html/WriteLog/2006-11/msg00053.html (6,776 bytes)
2. Re: [WriteLog] Spam Spots (score: 1): Author: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 00:28:56 -0000; I know what section VY1JA, W0SD, KL7XW, and KH6NF are in. Every other spot is just fodder to keep the rate-meter pegged. If you're using the cluster to find mults, you're losing the contest. 73, de H; /archives//html/WriteLog/2006-11/msg00056.html (8,199 bytes)
3. Re: [WriteLog] Spam Spots (score: 1): Author: KI9A@aol.com; Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 19:42:31 EST; Guess we need a filter to ignore any spot during SS that doesn't have section info. John, why would it matter? A lot ( most?) of us are looking for unworked stations, no matter which section they are; /archives//html/WriteLog/2006-11/msg00057.html (6,888 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]