Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Speeding\s+up\s+CW\s+exchange\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Speeding\s+up\s+CW\s+exchange\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Speeding up CW exchange (score: 1): Author: "Rick Graham" <rick.graham3@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:14:48 -0500; Hi all, I'm not sure where I read it, but was wondering if WL has the capability to signal the radio to speed up during the 599 (contest exchange), but then slow down to normal speed to give a serial; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-02/msg00142.html (8,066 bytes)
2. RE: [WriteLog] Speeding up CW exchange (score: 1): Author: Kurszewski Chad-WCK005 <chad@motorola.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 13:19:11 -0600; The CW keyer can also be programmed to temporarily change the CW speed during the transmission of a CW memory message. A "<" character in the message causes the speed to step up one step and a ">" c; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-02/msg00143.html (9,473 bytes)
3. Re: [WriteLog] Speeding up CW exchange (score: 1): Author: n4gi@tampabay.rr.com; Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:44:01 -0500; Only if your call begins with prefixes like these: P4, PJ, ZF, VP, HC8.... 73, Blake N4GI _______________________________________________ WriteLog mailing list WriteLog@contesting.com http://lists.co; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-02/msg00144.html (7,162 bytes)
4. Re: [WriteLog] Speeding up CW exchange (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:51:10 -0800 (PST); "could almost double his q's" I don't think so! Let's say for sake of argument that you're working guys at 180/hour, or 3/minute (a rate attainable by only the best CW operators). That's 20 seconds p; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-02/msg00145.html (7,988 bytes)
5. RE: [WriteLog] Speeding up CW exchange (score: 1): Author: "Rick Graham" <rick.graham3@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 15:10:59 -0500; I overheard some ops on the air with that 'double to q's' statement. I probably should have given the credit for that statement to them instead of trying claim the credit myself! ;) I did not, not do; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-02/msg00146.html (9,349 bytes)
6. Re: [WriteLog] Speeding up CW exchange (score: 1): Author: "Tony Osman" <tony.osman@sympatico.ca>; Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:42:44 -0500; If you are running at 180+ per hour, there is no time to CQ!! Tony, ve3rz other technique. at speeding up -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.300 / Vir; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-02/msg00147.html (9,368 bytes)
7. Re: [WriteLog] Speeding up CW exchange (score: 1): Author: "Bruce Meier" <n1ln@consolidated.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:13:20 -0600; Isn't it interesting that a ( > ) "greater than" sign makes the cw speed decrease and a ( < ) "less than" sign makes the cw speed increase? Bruce - N1LN ______________________________________________; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-02/msg00148.html (10,951 bytes)
8. Re: [WriteLog] Speeding up CW exchange (score: 1): Author: "Tony Osman" <tony.osman@sympatico.ca>; Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 20:23:03 -0500; Would have been worse had it been '+' and '-' Tony, ve3rz the _______________________________________________ WriteLog mailing list WriteLog@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinf; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-02/msg00150.html (12,522 bytes)
9. RE: [WriteLog] Speeding up CW exchange (score: 1): Author: "Garry Shapiro" <garry@ni6t.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 17:36:29 -0800; I just tested that by trying different sequences in one of the programmable Fx positions, and the "<" and ">" did absolutely nothing. Garry, NI6T Isn't it interesting that a ( > ) "greater than" sign; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-02/msg00151.html (11,454 bytes)
10. RE: [WriteLog] Speeding up CW exchange (score: 1): Author: "Barry " <w2up@mindspring.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 02:01:07 -0000; In my experience, a space is needed before and after the < and >. Don't forget, a single < will only increment the speed by a few WPM and may not be noticeable. Try using 4 or 5 of them. 73, Barry W2; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-02/msg00152.html (13,335 bytes)
11. RE: [WriteLog] Speeding up CW exchange (score: 1): Author: "Garry Shapiro" <garry@ni6t.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:01:53 -0800; Barry: I tried sequences like "599 <<<<< 599 >>>>> 599" and heard three identical "599"'s. Garry In my experience, a space is needed before and after the < and >. Don't forget, a single < will only i; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-02/msg00156.html (13,290 bytes)
12. Re: [WriteLog] Speeding up CW exchange (score: 1): Author: Dave NØRQ <n0rq-lists@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 22:02:57 -0600; It worked fine for me -- except that I put a space before and after the symbols: 599 < < < < < < 599 > > > > > > 599 Also, the > to decrease and < to increase makes sense -- the > goes from greater t; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-02/msg00157.html (9,006 bytes)
13. Re: [WriteLog] Speeding up CW exchange (score: 1): Author: George K3GP <k3gp@arrl.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 04:29:44 +0000; Garry Shapiro wrote: I just tested that by trying different sequences in one of the programmable Fx positions, and the "<" and ">" did absolutely nothing. Garry, NI6T Could this feature be dependent; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-02/msg00158.html (8,218 bytes)
14. Re: [WriteLog] Speeding up CW exchange (score: 1): Author: "Carsten Steinhöfel" <carsten.steinhoefel@web.de>; Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:53:20 +0100; Yes it does, because the Speed on the left of the ">" is greater than on the right, which is perfectly correct. 73 Carsten DL1EFD "Bruce Meier" <n1ln@consolidated.net> schrieb am 16.02.05 02:14:15: _; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-02/msg00160.html (12,724 bytes)
15. Re: [WriteLog] Speeding up CW exchange (score: 1): Author: "Garry Shapiro" <garry@ni6t.com>; Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:09:10 -0800; I had previously tried it unsuccessfully on an existing WL file--the recent CW Sprint, as a matter of fact. I just tried it with a new file and it worked just fine. It did not care whether or not the; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-02/msg00168.html (11,457 bytes)
16. Re: [WriteLog] Speeding up CW exchange (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 20:41:31 -0500; That's what CT uses. I don't find one set better or worse than the other. - Jim -- Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863 USA +978-251-9933, <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>, http:/; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-02/msg00199.html (8,797 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]