Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Spot\s+Filtering\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+Spot\s+Filtering\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] Spot Filtering (score: 1): Author: n1eu@hotmail.com (Barry N1EU); Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 10:11:32 EDT; Hi Randy, Thanks for the response. As I indicated in my original post, I've already tried this and find that Telnet nodes do not implement the filtering in a consistent manner. I have yet to succeed; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-10/msg00257.html (9,759 bytes)
2. [WriteLog] Spot Filtering (score: 1): Author: w2up@mindspring.com (Barry Kutner); Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 11:14:07 -0400; Speaking of filtering, I've noticed some of the telnet nodes use AR- Cluster, not the original Packet CLuster. ANyone know a Web site with docs on how to set AR-Cluster filters? I agree that filterin; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-10/msg00258.html (11,240 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] Spot Filtering (score: 1): Author: w5xd@writelog.com (W. Wright, W5XD); Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 00:18:42 -0000; I agree that having WL filter packet spots according to the contest you're in would be a good new feature. The reason it hasn't made it very high up the list is that packet spots don't come with a re; /archives//html/WriteLog/2000-10/msg00273.html (7,701 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]