I posted this to the CQ Contest reflector - Is it possible to improve the Writelog CW decoder ? I would really like to see the multi channel decoder have point and click like the RTTY windows or ful
When CW decoders become 99%+ effective it will become just another digital mode. Is that what we want? Dick -- Dick Flanagan K7VC dick@k7vc.com _______________________________________________ WriteLo
Perhaps we don't have a choice Dick -that is my point...If we don't embrance it a the purest of digital modes that it is, it will cease to exist .. When CW decoders become 99%+ effective it will be
Dick, and all, I hereby offer a prize of $100 greenback US dollars to the first serious competitor that submits a 99% accurate log for the ARRL November Sweepstakes using ONLY a "CW decoder" to copy
Never happen, to many people send BAD code. especially Bug operators. Don't give me no crap if the shoe fits wear it. your brain usually can copy CW but a computer can't copy 50 wpm dots and 10 wpm d
Hans That could be the start of a great challenge - Would it be better if the contest was a non US one ? to interest all entries ? If there is enough momentum we could create a web site to get the
Interesting thread. I am surprised the fur has not flown more by now. WriteLog is contest software (stating the obvious). My observation is that probably 95% of contesters use their contest software
I used to teach Novice classes and I had a hard time convincing my students to forget dots and dashes and learn the sound of each character and then whole words. starting with simple ones like - ....
Hi Trent and the WL group, There are actually two methods to decode CW already built-in to Writelog. The first is the aforementioned CW Display decoder window. On the negative side the decoded signal