Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+USB\s+support\s+yes\s+LPT\s+and\s+Com\s+support\s+no\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] USB support yes LPT and Com support no (score: 1)
Author: keith@kregli.com (Keith Regli)
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 21:43:08 -0700
It won't be long before we have only USB and Firewire or some new standard. Just imagine what we'll be forced to do. One little cable will plug into the computer. The other end will plug into a W5XD/
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-09/msg00016.html (8,888 bytes)

2. [WriteLog] USB support yes LPT and Com support no (score: 1)
Author: ve2dc@rac.ca (Mel Martin (VE2DC))
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 07:24:50 -0400
Not so subtle, I would say. RS232 is a well established signalling standard, and isn't going away in the foreseeable future. It is also, by it's nature, more appropriate around a ham station. COM por
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-09/msg00018.html (8,010 bytes)

3. [WriteLog] USB support yes LPT and Com support no (score: 1)
Author: n7us@arrl.net (Jim McDonald)
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 07:55:58 -0700
I thought I had the Belkin F5U103, but it's the predecessor, the F5U003. I don't know if the newer one is the same except for packaging or not. I have been using the F5U003 with a KAM for limited VHF
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-09/msg00029.html (14,684 bytes)

4. [WriteLog] USB support yes LPT and Com support no (score: 1)
Author: jim@forsyth.net (Jim Forsyth)
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 07:56:06 -0700
I certainly hope not. I would rather pay my money to just one engineer who knows what he is doing. Jim, AF6O
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-09/msg00030.html (7,278 bytes)

5. [WriteLog] USB support yes LPT and Com support no (score: 1)
Author: k4jrb@juno.com (Dave L Thompson)
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2002 12:22:06 -0400
I still get e-mail bulletins from VAR Business and Microsoft from my past business and I have noted that Microsoft only plans on supporting one OS as soon as possible and that will be NT as we are se
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-08/msg00415.html (7,326 bytes)

6. [WriteLog] USB support yes LPT and Com support no (score: 1)
Author: w5xd@writelog.com (W. Wright, W5XD)
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 00:13:18 -0000
I would like to add that there is a subtle difference important to contesters between the future of LPT ports and the future of COM ports in Windows. You can buy USB to LPT port adapters and you can
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-08/msg00422.html (9,774 bytes)

7. [WriteLog] USB support yes LPT and Com support no (score: 1)
Author: Steve Baron - KB3MM" <SteveBaron@StarLinX.com (Steve Baron - KB3MM)
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 00:55:47 -0000
Super position on LPT and the potential NT family security issue.
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-08/msg00424.html (11,141 bytes)

8. [WriteLog] USB support yes LPT and Com support no (score: 1)
Author: aa5au@bellsouth.net (Don Hill AA5AU)
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 22:54:48 -0500
The biggest problems today with USB-to-Serial adapters is for generating FSK and CW (some having problems generating CW). But I have heard some say they have great success running CW using them. For
/archives//html/WriteLog/2002-08/msg00427.html (13,748 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu