Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+WriteLog\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+30\,\s+Issue\s+7\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+WriteLog\s+Digest\,\s+Vol\s+30\,\s+Issue\s+7\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [WriteLog] WriteLog Digest, Vol 30, Issue 7 (score: 1): Author: Marc Ressler <marc.ressler@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 23:55:26 -0400; Clive, Most of the Icom rigs need to have TRANSCEIVE OFF with WL. The problem is that they "babble" so much when it is on that the single wire xmt/rcv data line suffers from lots of collisions, and w; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-06/msg00028.html (6,963 bytes)
2. Re: [WriteLog] WriteLog Digest, Vol 30, Issue 7 (score: 1): Author: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 07:39:34 -0400; Marc, thanks for the clarification: Writelog - ICOM transceive OFF CT - ICOM transceive ON 73 - Jim AD1C -- Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863 USA +978-251-9933, <jjreis; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-06/msg00030.html (7,803 bytes)
3. Re: [WriteLog] WriteLog Digest, Vol 30, Issue 7 (score: 1): Author: "Gary Senesac AL9A" <al9a@pobox.mtaonline.net>; Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 09:32:00 -0800; I've not noticed a lot of communication problems between WL and my IC-756ProI with the CI-V Transceive setting in the ON position. I just tried turning CI-V Transceive OFF and the main thing I notice; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-06/msg00033.html (8,809 bytes)
4. Re: [WriteLog] WriteLog Digest, Vol 30, Issue 7 (score: 1): Author: <steve@ai9t.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 14:06:56 -0400 (EDT); Hi All My ICOMS (756PRO thru PROIII)all run with transcieve on and always have. Never had any problem with Writelog. I'm using a clone CI-V cable which may act differently. 73 Steve AI9T http://www.a; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-06/msg00034.html (10,259 bytes)
5. Re: [WriteLog] WriteLog Digest, Vol 30, Issue 7 (score: 1): Author: "Clive Whelan" <clive.whelan@btinternet.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 19:01:46 -0000; Thanks Marc, that's exactly what I found by accident! I'm told however that transceive on works with WL if you don't poll the rig, and set a fixed baud rate ( say 9600 baud) and not AUTO. Boy this is; /archives//html/WriteLog/2005-06/msg00035.html (7,958 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]