- 1. [WriteLog] Writelog & microHAM compatibility question (score: 1)
- Author: Alan Maenchen <ad6e@arrl.net>
- Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 06:22:18 +0000
- I was surfing around recently and found a description of Writelog modifications by version number. Low and behold something caught my eye in v10.65 which said there was preliminary support for the MK
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2009-09/msg00031.html (8,322 bytes)
- 2. Re: [WriteLog] Writelog & microHAM compatibility question (score: 1)
- Author: "Kostas Stamatis" <sv1dpi@otenet.gr>
- Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 09:34:05 +0300
- Hello Allan I have mk2r+ and writelog 10.71 It worls so2r without lpt A virtual com according to microham protocol does the job 73 Kostas sv1dpi _______________________________________________ WriteL
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2009-09/msg00032.html (8,952 bytes)
- 3. Re: [WriteLog] Writelog & microHAM compatibility question (score: 1)
- Author: Alan Maenchen <ad6e@arrl.net>
- Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:08:00 +0000
- Tks to Joe, W4TV for the solution. Yes, it works great !! Writelog rocks! Somehow I missed hearing about this great advance. 73, Alan AD6E _______________________________________________ WriteLog mai
- /archives//html/WriteLog/2009-09/msg00033.html (7,070 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu