Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+microham\s+\&\s+WL\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[WriteLog\]\s+microham\s+\&\s+WL\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [WriteLog] microham & WL (score: 1): Author: KI9A@aol.com; Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 18:31:34 EST; Hey gang, Is anyone using the new microham "microkeyer" with WL? If so, how do you like it for both CW & SSB keying? 73-Chuck KI9A _______________________________________________ WriteLog mailing lis; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-12/msg00115.html (6,222 bytes)
2. RE: [WriteLog] microham & WL (score: 1): Author: "Don Hill AA5AU" <aa5au@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 23:59:23 -0600; If you are referring to the Microham USB micro KEYER, I have some info on CW and FSK at http://www.rttycontesting.com/microham/mk.htm. Sorry, I don't do SSB much although I might have lucked out on a; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-12/msg00116.html (7,627 bytes)
3. [WriteLog] microham & WL (score: 1): Author: "Don Hatlestad" <dhatlestad@mail.com>; Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 12:29:34 -0800; Chuck, I like the microKeyer so far, though I have only had it for a couple of weeks or so. Last night, I updated WL to 10.51 for the K1EL keyer support. A quick test proved that it works into a dumm; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-12/msg00117.html (7,462 bytes)
4. RE: [WriteLog] microham & WL (score: 1): Author: "Bob Mattaliano" <n6rfm@charter.net>; Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 19:01:34 -0500; Chuck, I have been using the MicroKeyer with WL for some time. There are many features to learn, but I continue to be very impressed. WL also supports WinKey directly as of 10.51. Thanks Wayne! Also,; /archives//html/WriteLog/2004-12/msg00131.html (7,523 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]