Mail Archive Search: <+from:davidho@one.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:davidho@one.net: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Yaesu] Re: [CQ-Contest] FT-920 advice- Thanks (score: 1): Author: davidho@one.net (David Ho (AF4BH)); Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 23:53:49 -0500; The VOX on my FT-920 works flawlessly. I don't think, as the owner of a FT-920, that this radio is a serious enough rig for contesting. On the other hand, it is a great radio for rag chewing and a pl; /archives//html/Yaesu/1999-03/msg00022.html (9,087 bytes)
2. [Yaesu] FT920 output (score: 1): Author: davidho@one.net (David Ho (de AF4BH)); Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 00:22:35 -0500 (EST); I have the same experience with my FT-920 as well. It is very interesting to see that the rig puts out the expected 100W peak if you send a pure tone into the mic. The normal speech peak, even with t; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-12/msg00067.html (8,561 bytes)
3. [Yaesu] Feedback on FT920 or FT847 for 6 meter use and backuprig to FT1000! (score: 1): Author: davidho@one.net (David Ho (de AF4BH)); Date: Mon, 17 Aug 1998 13:18:19 -0400 (EDT); Steve, I am not sure what you have heard about the FT920, but I am sure that I don't have many bad thing to say about it. Only one thing that bugs me to no end is it's electronic keyer. It doesn't su; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-08/msg00028.html (9,238 bytes)
4. [Yaesu] FT920 vs 870S vs Omni 6+ (score: 1): Author: davidho@one.net (David Ho (de AF4BH)); Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 11:20:34 -0400 (EDT); Eric, I don't know, collectively, what feature(s) you are looking for in terms of an upgrade. It must have been somethings that you like about the FT-920 when you bought it. Now that you like the oth; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-07/msg00051.html (9,792 bytes)
5. [Yaesu] FT-920 Production Bugs? (score: 1): Author: davidho@one.net (David Ho (de AF4BH)); Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 02:19:41 -0500 (EST); Not a problem to me. Mine is running 110 watts right out of the box. I don't know if it is the meter, just a few watts different won't bother me. I noticed that too. But again, it's just a slight dif; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-03/msg00057.html (11,087 bytes)
6. [Yaesu] FT-920 Production Bugs? (score: 1): Author: davidho@one.net (David Ho (de AF4BH)); Date: Sat, 21 Mar 1998 02:59:45 -0500 (EST); Mine doesn't need a "pass thru" AM board. It seems the to me the factory took care of it some how. Optional FM does post an irritation to me as a consumer, though. I only use the internal tuner when; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-03/msg00058.html (13,451 bytes)
7. [Yaesu] New H.F. rig (score: 1): Author: davidho@one.net (David Ho (AF4BH/VR2UE)); Date: Thu, 19 Feb 1998 12:15:23 -0500 (EST); This is BAD news for me if it is true because I just ordered my FT-920 and I thought it was at it's rock bottom price. Just kidding. I did ordered one Monday, though. Well, there's been talks in the; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-02/msg00037.html (8,321 bytes)
8. [Yaesu] Discontinued Rigs (score: 1): Author: davidho@one.net (David Ho (de AF4BH)); Date: Tue, 24 Feb 1998 10:47:48 -0500 (EST); I guess there are just too many gray areas among all rigs anymore. My personal preference is to see the FT-847 to replace 736R and 900. Since it's somewhat smaller in size that might suit the intende; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-02/msg00045.html (8,834 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]