Mail Archive Search: <+from:lanej@provide.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:lanej@provide.net: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [Yaesu] FT-1000D Bandwidth (score: 1): Author: lanej@provide.net (John Lane); Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1999 13:10:01 -0000; The shift control should provide the same passband carrier point regardless of the filter used although occasionally I need to adjust it slightly when going from 250Hz to 500Hz when using RTTY. It sh; /archives//html/Yaesu/1999-01/msg00002.html (11,039 bytes)
2. [Yaesu] Building a CAT interface (score: 1): Author: lanej@provide.net (John Lane); Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 11:53:13 -0000; The 757 needs TTL logic level inputs for it's CATt interface. I built an interface using the Maxim MAX232 chip. A very simple arrangement. I believe there was an article in QST a few years back or yo; /archives//html/Yaesu/1999-01/msg00056.html (7,502 bytes)
3. [Yaesu] FT920 output (score: 1): Author: lanej@provide.net (John Lane); Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 12:26:04 -0000; A properly adjusted SSB transmitter will only showabout 30 to 50% of CW output on voice peaks (using an average reading watt meter such as a Bird 43) and perhaps a little more when speech processing; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-12/msg00068.html (9,974 bytes)
4. [Yaesu] FT920 vs 870S vs Omni 6+ (score: 1): Author: lanej@provide.net (John Lane); Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 07:47:40 -0400; Personally I wouldn't consider the radios you mention to be an upgrade to the FT-920. They are really in the same class. For something better I would suggest the FT-1000MP/D, TS-950SDX , IC-775 or so; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-07/msg00050.html (8,578 bytes)
5. [Yaesu] FT920 vs 870S vs Omni 6+ (score: 1): Author: lanej@provide.net (John Lane); Date: Sun, 26 Jul 1998 09:05:03 -0400; If it were me I'd buy the Yaesu. Yaesu service and support is superior to Icom and I've had many problems with Icom radios in the past. My experience with the IC-211 would be enough to swear off Icom; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-07/msg00058.html (7,744 bytes)
6. [Yaesu] Ft 920 Power Out (score: 1): Author: lanej@provide.net (John Lane); Date: Mon, 13 Apr 1998 20:24:27 -0400; I'm not sure he has a problem. +/- 15 watts at 100 watts measured is within the accuracy of many watt meters. The Bird 43 is rated at +/- 5% FS on a good day. Who knows about the internal metering in; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-04/msg00045.html (7,525 bytes)
7. [Yaesu] Cleaning sealed control pots.re Kenpro control pots. (score: 1): Author: lanej@provide.net (John Lane); Date: Wed, 7 Jan 1998 17:33:12 -0500; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_001D_01BD1B92.53E16EE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cramolin R/Deoxit clean; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-01/msg00030.html (9,480 bytes)
8. [Yaesu] ft-1000d question (score: 1): Author: lanej@provide.net (John Lane); Date: Wed, 28 Jan 1998 22:18:03 -0500; Not possible on the FT-1000. W8KX -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.qsl.net/k7on/yaesu.html Submissions: yaesu@contesting.com Administrative requests: yaesu-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-yaesu@conte; /archives//html/Yaesu/1998-01/msg00105.html (6,892 bytes)
9. [Yaesu] FT50 & battery drainage (score: 1): Author: lanej@provide.net (John Lane); Date: Tue, 30 Dec 1997 10:24:43 -0500; I haven't had this problem with the FT-50 or the FT-470. I have had a set of alkaline batteries in my FT-50 for the past 6 months with intermittent use and they are still good. It should be generally; /archives//html/Yaesu/1997-12/msg00112.html (9,587 bytes)
10. [Yaesu] opinion about FT-890 ? (score: 1): Author: lanej@provide.net (John Lane); Date: Fri, 28 Nov 1997 19:41:10 -0000; I had an FT-890 for a short while. Basically a good radio, better than an FT-747/757/840 not quite as good as an FT-920 or FT-1000 (receiver wise). Stock SSB filter is wimpy and the upgrade is expens; /archives//html/Yaesu/1997-11/msg00105.html (8,138 bytes)
11. [Yaesu] FT-990/-1000D/MP Thoughts? (score: 1): Author: lanej@provide.net (John Lane); Date: Mon, 2 Jun 1997 20:24:10 -0400; My suggestion is to sell the FT-990. Several people I know who have owned them have had problems. I have an FT-1000 and love the radio but be advised that the Molex style connector which feeds Vcc to; /archives//html/Yaesu/1997-06/msg00009.html (9,235 bytes)
12. [Yaesu] Any Alternative to FIF-232C Interface? (score: 1): Author: lanej@provide.net (John Lane); Date: Mon, 2 Jun 1997 20:29:03 -0400; I vote for the Maxim 232 chip. I built one up in a little box and it works FB. The FT-1000 needs a 100K resistor to Vcc on the digital output to the 232 interface. W8KX -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.qsl.; /archives//html/Yaesu/1997-06/msg00010.html (8,339 bytes)
13. [Yaesu] FT1000 & DSP2232 (score: 1): Author: lanej@provide.net (John C. Lane); Date: Wed, 2 Apr 1997 10:00:58 +0100; I have a DSP-2232 interfaced to an FT-1000. The system works fine but you may have to adjust the FT-1000 internal level controls if your driving the DSP-2232 with AFSK. I believe mine had to be set a; /archives//html/Yaesu/1997-04/msg00001.html (7,921 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]