Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Yaesu\]\s+Anyone\s+with\s+FT\-100\s+impressions\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Yaesu\]\s+Anyone\s+with\s+FT\-100\s+impressions\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [Yaesu] Anyone with FT-100 impressions? (score: 1): Author: w2ki@amsat.org (John Hirth); Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 09:00:00 -0400; Has anyone on the list gotten an FT-100? If so, would you please share your impressions? I'm in the market for a small HF/V/U mobile/backup rig and my first thought is an FT-100 to complement my FT-1; /archives//html/Yaesu/1999-07/msg00027.html (8,837 bytes)
2. [Yaesu] Anyone with FT-100 impressions? (score: 1): Author: hfshack@hotmail.com (Geos Major); Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 09:38:35 EDT; Consensus of ECars Ops running mobile: For mobile ops the ICOM 706MKIIG is the winner hands down. It has proven to be much more reliable, stable, and the noise blanker really works. Also, little or n; /archives//html/Yaesu/1999-07/msg00028.html (10,355 bytes)
3. [Yaesu] Anyone with FT-100 impressions? (score: 1): Author: wa3gin@erols.com (Dave Jordan); Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 10:56:26 -0400; John, I have heard several FT-100s on 40m mobile...most of them had RF on the audio. I'd wait a year or two before I buy one of those....you can get a FT-900 for much less and have a first class mobi; /archives//html/Yaesu/1999-07/msg00030.html (8,831 bytes)
4. [Yaesu] Anyone with FT-100 impressions? (score: 1): Author: donald.s.tucker@exgate.tek.com (donald.s.tucker@exgate.tek.com); Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 08:37:06 -0700; Agree, would look for a good FT900 and if it does not have the SSB filter get one from IRAD. Mine has seen everything a Timex has and it just keeps ticking. One great rig for mobile. Don W7WLL John,; /archives//html/Yaesu/1999-07/msg00031.html (9,894 bytes)
5. [Yaesu] Anyone with FT-100 impressions? (score: 1): Author: wa3gin@erols.com (Dave Jordan); Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 12:30:30 -0400; Barnett TSK TSK, Actually, that statement about consensus on ECARS is not accurate as I've been keeping track of my mobile station check-ins since the beginning of the year. Tell me GL where did you; /archives//html/Yaesu/1999-07/msg00032.html (11,184 bytes)
6. [Yaesu] Anyone with FT-100 impressions? (score: 1): Author: Sean Warner K0XQ" <k0xq@arrl.net (Sean Warner K0XQ); Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 17:13:22 -0000; to Without breaking into a long winded dissertation......... Well, having tried both, I thought both were reliable & stable. I thought the Icom was a little more user friendly than the FT-100, but on; /archives//html/Yaesu/1999-07/msg00033.html (9,177 bytes)
7. [Yaesu] Anyone with FT-100 impressions? (score: 1): Author: hfshack@hotmail.com (Geos Major); Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 14:00:31 EDT; Hi Dave, My statement applies to the topic of the Post only, i.e. FT-100 and the ICOM 706MKIIG. (No other rigs were mentioned in the original post)The 'consensus' reference is for only those ECars Op; /archives//html/Yaesu/1999-07/msg00034.html (9,437 bytes)
8. [Yaesu] Anyone with FT-100 impressions? (score: 1): Author: lmenzel@millcomm.com (Larry Menzel); Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 13:38:30 -0500; After 2 months of use, I concur. The 706 MKII is a great rig. I don't see spending the extra money for 450 band if you have other radios for the purpose. Noise blanker is superior to FT100, and the D; /archives//html/Yaesu/1999-07/msg00035.html (11,673 bytes)
9. [Yaesu] Anyone with FT-100 impressions? (score: 1): Author: wa3gin@erols.com (Dave Jordan); Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 15:40:44 -0400; Barnett, No need to respond -- I was pulling your leg -- also off topic but but I'll blame W2LKS as he always gets me in trouble with off topic stuff on the net, HAHA. HAVE FUN, dave == To: <yaesu@co; /archives//html/Yaesu/1999-07/msg00036.html (10,414 bytes)
10. [Yaesu] Anyone with FT-100 impressions? (score: 1): Author: vk6apk@eon.net.au (Alek Petkovic); Date: Fri, 23 Jul 1999 13:13:17 +0800; John, I have no hesitation in recommending the FT-100. If you buy it, you will not be sorry. I have never heard a better noise blanker and the dsp filtering is superb. I think that Yaesu got it right; /archives//html/Yaesu/1999-07/msg00039.html (10,550 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]