Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Yaesu\]\s+FT\-1000D\s+Intermod\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Yaesu\]\s+FT\-1000D\s+Intermod\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [Yaesu] FT-1000D Intermod (score: 1): Author: sellington@ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: 4 Nov 1996 09:37:52 -0500; My FT-1000D seems to hear CW intermodulation products whenever a band is full of moderately strong signals. Yet the measured third-order intercept is normal (and very high). Also, inserting attenuati; /archives//html/Yaesu/1996-11/msg00011.html (8,278 bytes)
2. [Yaesu] FT-1000D Intermod (score: 1): Author: don_gaikins@partyline.net (Don Gaikins); Date: Mon, 04 Nov 1996 18:14:33 -0600; Try turning off your noise blanker. Bet it will go away! Don Gaikins WD0CHW don_gaikins@partyline.net -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/yaesufaq.html Submissions: yaesu@contesting.com Administ; /archives//html/Yaesu/1996-11/msg00012.html (9,437 bytes)
3. [Yaesu] FT-1000D Intermod (score: 1): Author: james119@iu.net (James M.); Date: Mon, 04 Nov 1996 22:27:08 -0800; If you have the NB on high setting, strong signals can cause the blanker to distort the desired signal. Either turn he NB off or reduce the NB level control. That may be what'c causing the problem. J; /archives//html/Yaesu/1996-11/msg00014.html (9,229 bytes)
4. [Yaesu] FT-1000D Intermod (score: 1): Author: sellington@ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: 5 Nov 1996 08:38:46 -0500; Thanks to all who responded. Sorry I didn't think to point out that, yes, the noise blanker was off. I made some more measurements last night, and it looks like the problem may be high order spurious; /archives//html/Yaesu/1996-11/msg00016.html (8,523 bytes)
5. [Yaesu] FT-1000D Intermod (score: 1): Author: james119@iu.net (James M.); Date: Tue, 05 Nov 1996 14:23:14 -0800; I kind of notice the same thing on extremely strong AM signals (30+ db over S9), but not sure if it's on the signal itself (i.e. lact of spectral purity of the transmitter) or in the receiver. Just b; /archives//html/Yaesu/1996-11/msg00017.html (9,685 bytes)
6. [Yaesu] FT-1000D Intermod (score: 1): Author: james119@iu.net (James M.); Date: Tue, 05 Nov 1996 16:48:07 -0800; I've discovered something about my so-called "intermod"... One "spur" I get about 9.4 khz above a strong (S9+30) AM broadcast signal (when on LSB) seemed to be audible on both sides of the null point; /archives//html/Yaesu/1996-11/msg00019.html (9,951 bytes)
7. [Yaesu] FT-1000D Intermod (score: 1): Author: james119@iu.net (James M.); Date: Sun, 10 Nov 1996 17:34:18 -0800; Well after playing with my FT-1000 a bit, I notice the same thing happening. This intermod is apparently happening in the IF Unit, not in the front end. I can eliminate this intermod by cranking back; /archives//html/Yaesu/1996-11/msg00032.html (10,091 bytes)
8. [Yaesu] FT-1000D Intermod (score: 1): Author: sellington@ssec.wisc.edu (sellington); Date: 11 Nov 1996 09:14:36 -0500; That's possible, but I'm not sure it explains how the strength of the spur varies linearly with the input signal strength. Perhaps the AGC maintains a constant signal level at the stage generating t; /archives//html/Yaesu/1996-11/msg00035.html (8,418 bytes)
9. [Yaesu] FT-1000D Intermod (score: 1): Author: james119@iu.net (James M.); Date: Mon, 11 Nov 1996 12:02:49 -0800; Scott, In addition to the audio intermod with dense CW signals, I noticed a very weak spur either side of a very strong carrier which can apparently be changed by adjusting the SHIFT or WIDTH control; /archives//html/Yaesu/1996-11/msg00036.html (10,560 bytes)
10. [Yaesu] FT-1000D Intermod (score: 1): Author: aa0cy@robertwanderer.gardnerville.nv.us (Robert Wanderer); Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 18:01:55 -0800; GOOD LUCK! HE'S NEVER RETURNED ANY OF MY MANY TO HIM! (Can't buy Icom they don't repair properly the first three times; Can't buy Ten-Tec, they don't have all the features I like although their reciv; /archives//html/Yaesu/1996-11/msg00041.html (9,568 bytes)
11. [Yaesu] FT-1000D Intermod (score: 1): Author: james119@iu.net (James M.); Date: Wed, 13 Nov 1996 22:46:30 -0800; You know, I think we're experiencing a crisis in the high end amateur equipment market these days. Everyone'w so focused on latest DSP gadgets and pretty front panels that they've forgotten the basic; /archives//html/Yaesu/1996-11/msg00043.html (10,499 bytes)
12. [Yaesu] FT-1000D Intermod (score: 1): Author: aa0cy@robertwanderer.gardnerville.nv.us (Robert Wanderer); Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 19:11:10 -0800; Oddly enough, Chip called me today! Maybe his ears burned over this e-mail! I told him about the many messages concerning IMD and 160-metre spurs appearing on the Yaesu Reflector. Yaesu's aware of th; /archives//html/Yaesu/1996-11/msg00047.html (10,502 bytes)
13. [Yaesu] FT-1000D Intermod (score: 1): Author: james119@iu.net (James M.); Date: Sun, 17 Nov 1996 10:14:09 -0800; Never mind. I spoke with a tech. rep. at Yaesu and she was clueless. So I returned the FT-1000D to the dealer and got an ICOM-775DSP instead! Full duty cycle 200W transmit and its fan is quiet (thank; /archives//html/Yaesu/1996-11/msg00049.html (10,667 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]