Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Yaesu\]\s+Sherwood\s+Engineering\s+test\s+numbers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Yaesu\]\s+Sherwood\s+Engineering\s+test\s+numbers\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [Yaesu] Sherwood Engineering test numbers (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 13:58:05 -0700 (PDT); How much stock does everyone place in the Sherwood Engineering receiver test numbers (www.sherweng.com)? While I admit that the 2khz spacing is a much more useful measurement than the 20khz the ARRL; /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-10/msg00008.html (7,529 bytes)
2. Re: [Yaesu] Sherwood Engineering test numbers (score: 1): Author: Hardy Landskov <n7rt@cox.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 08:24:12 -0700; Snip..... I too would be interested in knowing his exact test setup. I know when we were doing IP3 measurements on the Manpack radio we were designing, we required at least 70 dB of isolation between; /archives//html/Yaesu/2006-10/msg00009.html (8,194 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]