Mail Archive Search: <+from:34703@vlf03v31.ueci.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:34703@vlf03v31.ueci.com: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. CT9.10a and beam headings (score: 1): Author: Dave Hawes <34703@vlf03v31.ueci.com> (Dave Hawes); Date: 24 Oct 94 07:57:39 EDT; Messing around with CT9.10a from CT-BBS, getting ready for the big one. Got AD1C's CTY.DAT on 10/21, edited it to show the right longitude and latitude for US. Looks like CT is reporting headings abo; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-10/msg00056.html (6,722 bytes)
2. CT9.10a, TS950SDX, and POLL (score: 1): Author: Dave Hawes <34703@vlf03v31.ueci.com> (Dave Hawes); Date: 24 Oct 94 08:09:31 EDT; With a 950, when CT does its POLL of the radio, the keyboard seems to be frozen, although buffered. With the default POLL setting of 1 second, this results in an irritating delay between keystroke an; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-10/msg00057.html (8,057 bytes)
3. 765 bugs (score: 1): Author: Dave Hawes <34703@vlf03v31.ueci.com> (Dave Hawes); Date: 31 Oct 94 11:37:34 EDT; Walt, we used exactly the same setup at N3RS as you did - IC-765 and CT9.13. We never noticed any delays at all on anything. Used 9.13 the entire weekend, and although there are a couple of micro-bu; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-10/msg00078.html (7,716 bytes)
4. CT 9.11 bug report (score: 1): Author: Dave Hawes <34703@vlf03v31.ueci.com> (Dave Hawes); Date: 31 Oct 94 13:45:53 EDT; At N3RS we used CT 9.13, and found the same band map and PacketCluster window responses following manual entry of a call by Ctrl-Enter. In M/S, we used the manual entry capability on the MULT station; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-10/msg00083.html (7,841 bytes)
5. TS-850/950 interface problems (score: 1): Author: Dave Hawes <34703@vlf03v31.ueci.com> (Dave Hawes); Date: 8 Mar 94 10:18:39 EDT; At N3RS this weekend we used a TS-950SDX and a beta copy of CT9. Ken assures me that the code in CT9-beta is no different than that in 8.52 regarding the radio interface. Well, WE HAD TONS OF TROUBLE; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-03/msg00020.html (6,674 bytes)
6. CT 8.52 OK?? (score: 1): Author: Dave Hawes <34703@vlf03v31.ueci.com> (Dave Hawes); Date: 14 Feb 94 07:19:29 EDT; Barry, I used 8.52 386 version in CQ 160 from VP9AD. No problems that I could see. 73 - Dave, N3RD -- Dave Hawes Internet: 34703@vlf03v31.ueci.com Raytheon Engineers, Valley Forge, PA Voice: 610-254; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-02/msg00009.html (6,637 bytes)
7. Type-ahead Feature - A survey (score: 1): Author: Dave Hawes <34703@vlf03v31.ueci.com> (Dave Hawes); Date: 15 Feb 94 12:19:57 EDT; Recent messages on the reflector make me wonder if I'm the ONLY ONE who doesn't regularly use this feature. "NoWorkDupe No Work in TypeAhead" is news to me, since I rarely use type ahead, and the lik; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-02/msg00014.html (8,264 bytes)
8. Super Check Partial (score: 1): Author: Dave Hawes <34703@vlf03v31.ueci.com> (Dave Hawes); Date: 22 Feb 94 14:28:29 EDT; Steve, Version 9 (currently in beta testing) reverts back to the previous 2 character automatic Check/SuperPartial. I agree with you that an "on the fly" switch to ENABLE/DISABLE SuperCheckPartial wo; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-02/msg00028.html (6,811 bytes)
9. TypeAhead Survey Results (score: 1): Author: Dave Hawes <34703@vlf03v31.ueci.com> (Dave Hawes); Date: 23 Feb 94 15:56:03 EDT; I received responses from WM2C, N6TV, N6AZE, K1XM, K1GQ, AD1C, N4TQO, K0GU, KZ2S, and DL6RAI regarding my query about use of TypeAhead & NoWorkDupe. Thanks, guys, for taking the time and effort to re; /archives//html/CT-User/1994-02/msg00033.html (17,068 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]