Hi David, Now it hurts? What do you say if look at SSB scores, multiply each QSO 3pts, equally for all and take a look. 4O3A should be WW winner, and scores weight looks much more reasonable. Why not
Whatever No decoding technology helps to OP, make his available time more efficient and push him to be more preshurized on efficient operating, all is on the good way. I understand both standings - K
Hi Mladen and others, It is also unclear to me what happened with my log and I have asked for clarification from CQWW CC and CQ Magazine. I am ready to disclose all the details about my log and the i
I completed the survey, but something is missing there. Randy should consider different scoring for EU stations as well. Maybe 2 points for EU-EU contacts, what will make scores from EU more competit
Will spent night 16-17 January in Rome, and would be nice to take a coffee with some contesters close to Fiumicino? 73 Ranko _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ
It is one of our crucial issues - scoring. Kim is absolutely right, and from my point of view, all what he is saying is so obvious, clear and aright, that I do not understand some polemics. We all wo
Some useful information about setup and hardware solution we used in CQ WW SSB can be found here - http://4o3a.com/index.php/4o3a-station/stories/cqww-2014 73 Ranko __________________________________
Live video from 4O3A is on url below GL in contest to everyone -- Forwarded message -- From: "Marko Tomaevi" <marko@tomasevic.me> Date: 29 Nov 2014 00:40 Subject: UStream To: "Ranko Boca" <4o3a.ranko
Hi to all, I hope that some comments will be considered and Team selection criteria will be changed a bit? For me and all contesters whom I discussed with, obvious problem is having to short selectio
Hi Chris, would you be so kind to clafiry what exactly mean definition below: *Assisted scores are compared against Unassisted scores. If someone make in CQWW as unassisted - 10 points Another guy ma
Sinisa/David, If it is a true, than organizer missed the essence of WRTC. I still hope it could be a mistake, or unclear rules. Otherwise, it's senseless and for some reason organizer wants to push a
Hello Chris, This is clear now. Thank you very much. So nobody who would like to qualify for WRTC will not operate unassisted in next two years, as it is senseless. Chris, it will be very kind if you
Mat, thanks to you and others for being open and fair, trying to convince Cris and his team to modify rules to be at least acceptable. Not only Ass/ vs Unass, but all five rules weaknesses I noticed
Dear Chris, nice that you consider our opinions. Intention is not to criticize. On the contrary, we all want to help you to make rules to be as good as possible, and I am sure - it is our common inte
Hi Martin and Frank, I really appreciate different opinions, and will answers you as simple as possible. I do not thing that difference Unassisted vs Assisted is step forward in contesting. It is jus
Hello Chris, I would like to make comment of rules once more time. One decision, which disturb all of potential qualifiers is a given qualification time - years 2015 and 2016. Reason for this - as yo
Yes Jim, 5000 Euros entry tickets is much more clear. I would rather accept organizer to invite teams by whatever own criteria they like, instead bad rules. Myself, I am thinking should I quit and vi
Once more I would like to ask our German friends to reconsider two important parts of rules: 1. Qualification period. It is really too short. Needless to repeat reasons why it should be longer. 2. We
Hi Martin, Your opinion has some logic, indeed. Respecting different opinions, I just want to ask German friends to reconsider and discuss sensitive and important part of rules. That's all, and their