Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Aldewey@aol.com: 81 ]

Total 81 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] CWSS and daylight savings time (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 20:03:03 EDT
We start an hour later than normal, the way I see it. Am I right? 2100Z during DST is 4 PM local ( central ) 2100Z after DST is 3 PM local ( central ) 73-Chuck KI9A The way I understand it, we will s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-09/msg00258.html (9,297 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CWSS and daylight savings time (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 22:38:30 EDT
The way I understand it, we will start at the same time (3 PM in the midwest) but then ending time will be one hour earlier on the wall clock (i.e 8 PM in the midwest). After talking to KI9A off line
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-09/msg00264.html (8,968 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] TQP vs CQ RTTY (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 14:11:05 EDT
There was once a four-land QSO party. It was never very successful and disappeared at or about the time that its organizer, W4OMW, died. Every fourth area state has a fairly successful QSO party each
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00102.html (9,081 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Paddle Opinions? (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:27:03 EDT
Fully understanding that likes/dislikes in paddles (or scotch, women and cigars...) can be completely subjective, I'd appreciate knowing what you like (or, don't) and, if you can tell my why you feel
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-10/msg00225.html (8,054 bytes)

5. [CQ-Contest] Contesting with Softward Define Radios (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 09:17:24 EST
All; I would be interested in hearing from anyone who has done some serious contesting with one of the newer software defined radios such as the Flex5000. If you have done so, and might be interested
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-11/msg00371.html (7,130 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] SPRINT Contest Format (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 10:24:21 EST
Seriously, it is really a great format for Little Pistol Contest Stations, especially when you "inherit" the frequency. No Big Guns can just sit parked on a particular frequency which is also cool if
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00672.html (7,778 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] SPRINT Contest Format (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:25:04 EST
However, as I stated above, this is in no way an argument against the QSY rule for Sprints: I think it is what makes a Sprint-rule contest the true test of operating skill. It just isn't always a rul
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00686.html (7,962 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] Sep 2007 NA Sprint SSB results (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 16:00:04 EST
The results of the September 2007 North American Sprint, Phone, are now published in the Jan/Feb 2008 NCJ, p. 42. In the Top 10 box, the SO winner, K7SS's, breakdown has # for band changes, and the h
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-12/msg00700.html (7,518 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] Minnesota QSO Party This Weekend! (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 23:49:39 EST
Don't miss the increasingly popular Minnesota QSO Party this Saturday, February 2 from 1400z to 2400z. Participation in this event has grown dramatically over the last few years. Once again, all 87 M
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-01/msg00481.html (7,672 bytes)

10. Re: [CQ-Contest] Did Anyone Run CW Skimmer for ARRL DX or CQ 160 COtnests?? (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:02:20 EST
All; I, too, am interested in hearing of practical applications of CW Skimmer in some real contests. I am especially interested in situations where stations have run completely independent of the DX
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00598.html (8,192 bytes)

11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer vs. assisted (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 19:26:18 EDT
I would suggest the ARRL CAC has some work to do, as it could be argued that the rules of ARRL contests do not restrict Skimmer use. Kelley; Just to be clear, it is not the ARRL CAC that makes this d
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00535.html (8,316 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] FQP and Writelog (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:46:09 EDT
After posting my FQP score to 3830, I noticed that Writelog did not take into consideration the low power x2 multiplier. Is that a known bug in WL? I am using an older version (10.59D). 73, Al, K0AD
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00468.html (7,035 bytes)

13. Re: [CQ-Contest] State QSO parties and CW (score: 1)
Author: aldewey@aol.com
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:23:47 -0400
This is something we looked at long and hard for the Minnesota QSO Party.? Every year there are cries to remove the 2 pt vs 1 pt rule for CW and SSB.? We are not convinced that this would make much d
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00549.html (10,078 bytes)

14. Re: [CQ-Contest] This is Logic? - comment (score: 1)
Author: aldewey@aol.com
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 09:52:18 -0400
Tod; ? I am sort of in agreement with you here.? One thing that concerns me about this debate is that there seem to be an awful lot of people commenting and I wonder how many have actually used Skimm
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00312.html (11,968 bytes)

15. Re: [CQ-Contest] DX Doubler and contesting (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:29:28 EDT
The diagram in the manual seems to indicate putting them in parallel. That doesn't look right. My homebrew SO2R box uses switches a relay between the sources and I transformer isolate the DVP audio.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00295.html (8,528 bytes)

16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Top Ten scores & 3830 postings? (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:36:32 EDT
I usually always upload my score to 3830 for another reason - regardless of the score. I like the format of the summary that 3830 generates. When I am done posting, I cut and paste the summary from 3
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-08/msg00292.html (8,808 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] How do you get better? (score: 1)
Author: aldewey@aol.com
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 17:31:41 -0400
I do QRP a lot. Lots of guys immediately get my callsign, but that's cuz they recognize it or figure it out. I am always very happy when I send an exchange that isn't copied (I'm too weak) and they s
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-10/msg00342.html (11,353 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Exchange sequence (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 10:48:06 EST
The SS exchange emulates the message format but there is no intent that this be a training exercise to handle message traffic. Although I am an old traffic handler myself, I suspect there are some ou
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00131.html (8,597 bytes)

19. [CQ-Contest] Minnesota QSO Party Tomorrow! (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 22:08:19 EST
Last minute reminder that the Minnesota QSO Party kicks off at 1400Z tomorrow (Saturday- Feb 7) and runs for 10 hours until 2400Z. Listen for LOTS of activity as 14 rovers roam the entire state of Mi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00084.html (7,390 bytes)

20. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP RTTY Online Log Submission Broken? (score: 1)
Author: Aldewey@aol.com
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 17:40:09 EST
Is it me or is the online log submission of yesterday's contest broken? There was a problem with the dates but this has been fixed now. Please try to submit your log again. 73, Al, K0AD **A Good Cred
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-03/msg00011.html (7,800 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu