Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Chetmoore@cox.net: 156 ]

Total 156 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical Identifcation (score: 1)
Author: "Chet" <chetmoore@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:01:11 -0400
The picture did not come through !!! chet Who made a multiband base loaded vertical over 20 feet tall with a capacitor hat on top made back in the 1950's or early 1960's. It ran 80-10 or 160-10. I sa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-03/msg00318.html (8,353 bytes)

102. Re: [TowerTalk] 2" masts.. an eye opener ! (score: 1)
Author: "Chet" <chetmoore@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:57:53 -0400
Looks like your elevation rotor slipped. Here is what "cheap mast" pipe did to me when the eye of Charlie came over.. http://www.n4zkf.com/files/Tower.jpg I have since went to steel and it's done wel
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-03/msg00370.html (13,245 bytes)

103. Re: [TowerTalk] TH-7DXX vs. TH-6DX (score: 1)
Author: "Chet" <chetmoore@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:38:49 -0400
Consider buying or borrowing from your club's copy of the K7LXS tribander report from the moderator of this reflector. This report covers just about all the tri banders except the stepIRs which were
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-03/msg00617.html (9,644 bytes)

104. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking Beams (score: 1)
Author: "Chet" <chetmoore@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:56:50 -0400
Don that is a fantastic 40 m beam. I love mine. I have had mine up 5 years with no problems what so ever but......some one posted some simple mods that I would have made if I knew about them at the t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00476.html (9,486 bytes)

105. Re: [TowerTalk] 2 element quad on a 17.5' roof tower? (score: 1)
Author: "Chet" <chetmoore@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:00:43 -0400
I had my 2 El Skylane quad on 20 feet of tower with a 5 foot mast on a flat roof. No interaction That I could detect. Worked great. 73 Chet N4FX I am looking at putting up a decent hf antenna on my 1
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00614.html (9,192 bytes)

106. Re: [TowerTalk] Need a bit of help fairly pricing an AB-577 (score: 1)
Author: "Chet" <chetmoore@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:37:10 -0400
Grant, So how much did you pay for it?? I have one, and we have 5 more permanently mounted at W3PP. Without pix, its hard to Determine the condition. Google ab-577 masts. For me that brought up the s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-04/msg00919.html (10,617 bytes)

107. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR sale? (score: 1)
Author: "Chet" <chetmoore@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 00:08:57 -0400
DUMB and RETARDED note the lack of the stupid smiley face !!! chet Okay okay everybody take a deep breath and count to ten. Steppir isn't going anywhere. My earlier comment was facetious. Chris KF7P
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-05/msg00459.html (10,057 bytes)

108. Re: [TowerTalk] Optimium Tower Height (score: 1)
Author: "Chet" <chetmoore@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 08:03:18 -0400
I got that same advice from the same person, I only wish that I had received it 10 years earlier Than I did. 73 Chet N4FX --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-05/msg00496.html (11,062 bytes)

109. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna grease (score: 1)
Author: "Chet" <chetmoore@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 21:48:03 -0400
Tommy has it right ! using a blacklight will show you any areas were purplish dye was coated too thinly to be effective Chet N4FX Well of course not!! To work at UHF, you would have to tint it with s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-06/msg00225.html (11,047 bytes)

110. Re: [TowerTalk] XM240 to Moxon (score: 1)
Author: "Chet" <chetmoore@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:52:13 -0400
If I remember correctly, K3LR has converted all of his to moxons. Check his web site as I think the specs and details are on his site. 73 Chet N4fX I just read an article on the W6NL conversion of a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00502.html (8,007 bytes)

111. Re: [TowerTalk] Black coax (again) (score: 1)
Author: "chet moore" <chetmoore@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 20:01:07 -0700
A lightning HIT !!!!! Chet N4FX -- Original Message -- From: "Mickey Baker" <fishflorida@gmail.com> To: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com> Cc: "Towertalk" <towertalk@contesting.com> Sent: Wednesday,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00371.html (10,499 bytes)

112. Re: [TowerTalk] Climbing aid (score: 1)
Author: "Chet" <chetmoore@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 07:05:09 -0500
In the fighting u s coast guard they were called safety rails. Not sure if that's what the manufacturer called them Chet N4FX --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tower
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00186.html (8,212 bytes)

113. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 rivets (score: 1)
Author: "Chet" <chetmoore@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:13:50 -0500
F-12 antennas are pre drilled at the factory. The instructions with mine say if there are 3 holes, use 3 rivets and insert all 3 rivets in the holes and don't pull any of them until you know all 3 li
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00323.html (9,913 bytes)

114. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 rivets (score: 1)
Author: "Chet" <chetmoore@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 11:14:32 -0500
I have 3 f-12 rivited antennas here. Never had a failure. This does not appear to be a huge problem nationwide. The owner of this antenna says he only used one rivet in that element.I believe him. Ei
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00353.html (19,416 bytes)

115. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 rivets (score: 1)
Author: "Chet" <chetmoore@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 13:36:22 -0500
Yesssssssss! Assuming one rivet is strong enough to do the job the fact that they use three would indicate to me that not even the manufacturer doesn't trusts them. Perhaps a second for backup, but t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00361.html (15,670 bytes)

116. Re: [TowerTalk] 40m monbander and multibander stack question... (score: 1)
Author: "Chet" <chetmoore@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 22:24:31 -0500
I have a C31XR at 90 feet and a 2 el XM-240 at 75 feet. HFTA says the best height for me into EU on 40M is 70-75 feet. That's the reason for putting the 40M beam below the tribander. F-12 recommended
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-03/msg00035.html (9,337 bytes)

117. Re: [TowerTalk] Rebuilding a TH-3, advice sought. (score: 1)
Author: "Chet" <chetmoore@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 18:31:05 -0400
Buy the rebuild kit which comes with all new hardware, trap covers, clamps etc. I think the kit was 39 bux when I purchased it about 6 years ago. I used scotch brite to buff up the elements but if I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-07/msg00321.html (9,970 bytes)

118. Re: [TowerTalk] Two signals on the same frequency? (score: 1)
Author: "Chet" <chetmoore@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2011 16:48:55 -0400
I don't think you will be any louder but At least one consequence of tx's on the same freq is a much wider bandwidth. "Hypothetically" It would likely keep the other contesters from as cq'ing close t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-08/msg00112.html (9,041 bytes)

119. Re: [TowerTalk] Clanking Tail Twister II (score: 1)
Author: "Chet" <chetmoore@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 11:30:51 -0400
Hi Jon, The brake clanking is music to my ears, it's a great aid in trouble shooting rotor problems. I recommend Raising the antenna to 90 or 100 feet to lessen the noise. Sounds to me like your roto
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-10/msg00457.html (11,595 bytes)

120. Re: [TowerTalk] Frestanding Dipole Support - inexpensive (score: 1)
Author: "Chet" <chetmoore@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 18:21:03 -0500
Scotty, The post that appears immediately below, is one sent by K3LR a few years back. This should work for you too. I have to believe it would be a lot better than a low dipole. I am sure that the K
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-12/msg00321.html (11,859 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu