Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Ian: 2095 ] [ White: 4243 ]

Total 1544 documents matching your query.

281. [AMPS] Review of Antenna Tuner from Dayton (score: 147)
Author: Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK)
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 07:48:11 +0100
Actually, there is. In RadCom about a year ago, G3LNP described a very simple add-on rotary switch to short the capacitor completely at maximum. This converts the T-network to an L-network. By shorti
/archives//html/Amps/2001-06/msg00222.html (11,025 bytes)

282. [AMPS] FT1000MP and MLA2500 (score: 147)
Author: Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK)
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 22:43:01 +0100
There is a RF hold-off facility on the accessory socket of both the 1000MP and the 990, intended for use with the Yaesu linear. When the DIN plug is in the socket, it requires a ground on the appropr
/archives//html/Amps/2001-06/msg00263.html (7,688 bytes)

283. [AMPS] vacuum caps (score: 147)
Author: Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK)
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 08:42:25 +0100
No. If the leak is in one of the glass/metal seals - as seems likely - then that's the end. Because of the way the metal and glass have to be processed and then joined, those seals can only be made c
/archives//html/Amps/2001-06/msg00267.html (7,482 bytes)

284. [AMPS] Drake DL1000 dummy load - ratings? (score: 147)
Author: Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK)
Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 07:35:03 +0100
Do any of you Drake fans have Drake's original ratings for this item? It's just a 10" x 1" diameter Carborundum resistor in a perforated box. There seems to be an option to install a fan, but I'm sur
/archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00042.html (7,213 bytes)

285. [AMPS] UPDATE ON 3-1000Z OSCILLATION (score: 147)
Author: Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK)
Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 12:40:34 +0100
For amps that use a significant run of coax between the input picircuits and the socket, the coax must act as a high-impedance quarterwave stub at some VHF frequency, because it's shorted at the othe
/archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00133.html (9,816 bytes)

286. [AMPS] UPDATE ON 3-1000Z OSCILLATION (score: 147)
Author: Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK)
Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 07:35:38 +0100
That's surely true! May be worth trying, then... Agreed. Picking up Rich's point, adding or removing the covers is definitely going to make some changes in the current distribution inside the enclosu
/archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00154.html (11,973 bytes)

287. [AMPS] PSU Question (score: 147)
Author: Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK)
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 23:33:50 +0100
To get the best out of a GS35b you need 3.5kV on-load. 3.2kV is marginal and at 2.8kV it's really fading - the gain drops and it needs a lot of drive. On the other hand, you don't want to go above 4k
/archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00195.html (8,326 bytes)

288. [AMPS] Voltage Doublers (score: 147)
Author: Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK)
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 12:56:07 +0100
In one word, DON'T. The secondary resistance of the transformer - combined with the effects of primary resistance and diode on-resistance, which you also need to factor in - will ruin the voltage reg
/archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00302.html (12,207 bytes)

289. [AMPS] Voltage Doublers (score: 147)
Author: Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK)
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 18:37:38 +0100
That's for a significantly higher-voltage transformer (1175V?), and I seem to remember more than 10% droop at full load. For this application Glenn needs every last volt he can get, because even the
/archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00313.html (15,884 bytes)

290. [AMPS] Voltage Doublers (score: 151)
Author: Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK)
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 18:16:12 +0100
To: <amps@contesting.com> Yes, but that's only the secondary. Perhaps I should have mentioned this, but in order to get the *total* effective series resistance, you need to add in the resistance of t
/archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00314.html (10,884 bytes)

291. [AMPS] Voltage Doublers (score: 147)
Author: Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK)
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 19:38:49 +0100
Sorry - what I meant was, "the FW*D* one would be significantly *heavier* because..." 73 from Ian G3SEK Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book' 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.com/
/archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00316.html (9,159 bytes)

292. [AMPS] Voltage Doublers (score: 147)
Author: Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK)
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 14:59:33 +0100
Not duff at all, Steve. I get the same values as you, so I was wrong about including the resistance contribution of the diode strings. It seems that the diodes should be regarded as only a source of
/archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00330.html (9,806 bytes)

293. [AMPS] DJ5RE 2m Amplifier Tuning - Longish (score: 147)
Author: Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK)
Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 09:28:41 +0100
To: <amps@contesting.com> Sorry I wasn't available to come back to Phil yesterday. Significant grid current in a GS35b at idle current seems very unusual. Assuming there is no deliberate RF drive and
/archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00366.html (9,858 bytes)

294. [AMPS] Conjugate Matching and Efficiency (score: 147)
Author: Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK)
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 13:25:25 +0100
I don't think it's a matter for "correction", but of several equivalent viewpoints. Since they are all analysing the same reality, all of these viewpoints MUST agree. Any one of them can be used to c
/archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00454.html (12,161 bytes)

295. [AMPS] Sucking instead of Blowing (was - This guy is gotta be kidding!) (score: 147)
Author: Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK)
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 15:21:19 +0100
Can you remind us where the markings are in those two amps, for each of the tubes, in relation to the 'upstream' side? (Just wondering how much difference that makes.) 73 from Ian G3SEK Editor, 'The
/archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00458.html (9,204 bytes)

296. [AMPS] Conjugate Matching and Efficiency (score: 151)
Author: Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK)
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 15:18:40 +0100
I should have said that all alternative viewpoints that are correctly applied - *if* they can be correctly applied at all - must give consistent results. Exactly! Basic circuit theory says that Norto
/archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00459.html (11,826 bytes)

297. [AMPS] Sucking instead of Blowing (was - This guy is gotta be kidding!) (score: 147)
Author: Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK)
Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 21:24:11 +0100
Yes, I'm aware that happens - but what that party trick demonstrates is that at *low* velocities the airflow remains attached to the surface and flows smoothly around it to join up again at the far s
/archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00462.html (10,508 bytes)

298. [AMPS] Sucking instead of Blowing (was - This guy is gotta be kidding!) (score: 147)
Author: Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK)
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 12:56:14 +0100
I do indeed trust you, Phil - that's exactly why I was asking about this. Yes, I've seen Rich's article, and there's absolutely no doubt that (a) the SB-220 cooling system was very carefully thought
/archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00478.html (10,634 bytes)

299. [AMPS] Sucking instead of Blowing (was - This guy is gotta be kidding!) (score: 147)
Author: Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK)
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 09:11:24 +0100
All practical cooling fans create turbulence. It's easy to check with a streamer of smoke. Thank you - that's the information I was asking for. Can you confirm that the ink is on the opposite side fr
/archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00479.html (10,365 bytes)

300. [AMPS] Sucking instead of Blowing (was - This guy is gotta be kidding!) (score: 147)
Author: Ian White, G3SEK" <g3sek@ifwtech.com (Ian White, G3SEK)
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 22:28:24 +0100
And that is because...? 73 from Ian G3SEK Editor, 'The VHF/UHF DX Book' 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.com/g3sek -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/amps Submis
/archives//html/Amps/2001-05/msg00482.html (9,135 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu