Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:JBaumgarte@aol.com: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] HDR-300 rotator "stuck" (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2003 14:02:34 EST
Craig, Any chance the antenna might have swung past the limit switch while the rotor was unlocked? I had this happen to me once --it would turn a little but then the "wrong" limit switch came into pl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00107.html (7,744 bytes)

2. [Towertalk] Mosley 2el 40m ?? (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 16:46:32 EST
As has been said so many time, check with Mosely. The antenna (S402) is still, or at least close to, current. If you strike out, advise and I can help. Believe me, the manual isn't much! John, N0IJ -
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00152.html (6,904 bytes)

3. [Towertalk] raised/elevated guy posts (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 11:25:49 EDT
Good point, however, there many soil types and installations that will handle a huge load. I have a very loaded up 110' Rohn 55 Tower (prox 25 sq ft. antennas) supported by 3 elevated guy posts which
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00420.html (7,853 bytes)

4. [Towertalk] Crank-up install thoughts (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 12:44:22 EDT
Even though, at 60, I still do plenty of climbing on my 110' tower, I am getting smarter and tend to look a little further ahead then I used to. The fellow with the back-yard install sight for his US
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00041.html (7,589 bytes)

5. [Towertalk] Building Permit or Not (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 21:56:51 EDT
Steve is right on this point. As a former insurance adjuster, I can assure you that no adjuster can deny a claim based on such things as improper permits, or even, improper installation. If they acce
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00165.html (9,319 bytes)

6. [Towertalk] Insurance companies-->Coverage (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 10:15:10 EDT
However, big difference in what you might get from a claim in which the company called your tower "personal property." Unless you have a special endorsement, personal property is often subject to dep
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00182.html (8,809 bytes)

7. [Towertalk] Insurance companies-->Coverage (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 11:25:42 EDT
First of all your last statement is not at all true for most claims people. Folks just have to be more astute in reading their policies a bit to see what they are getting and what they are not! If yo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00188.html (10,305 bytes)

8. [Towertalk] 40 meter antennas (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 15:10:48 EDT
Steve, I wonder if you've actually tried one of these (Mosely 2 el 40)? I share your opinion of most of the other Mosely antennas, but want to share my results with this rather unusual antenna. I acq
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00226.html (7,817 bytes)

9. [Towertalk] Mast placement in tower top (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 16:27:01 EDT
<< Is there any documented work relating to the optimal mast position within a tower? For example, if one contemplates using a 20-foot steel mast with a Force12 C31 on one end, inserted into Rohn 55,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00424.html (7,366 bytes)

10. [Towertalk] Force 12 EF-180C (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 11:53:45 EST
<< Anyone using this Antenna, Force 12 EF-180C 75/80 meter rotatable dipole and at what height are you running it at. Local F12 Dealer put one up a couple of years ago and had a real unpleasant exper
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00073.html (8,402 bytes)

11. [TowerTalk] AOL V7 #2 (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 16:32:36 EST
Here is a reply from a AOL V7.0 user. N0IJ ________________________________________________________________________ This list is sponsored by the new eHam.net Store. When you buy products like ICE fi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00090.html (7,041 bytes)

12. [TowerTalk] Is it worth it to move 2El Quad from 50ft to 100ft????? (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 11:17:03 EDT
<< Since the original question concerned a move from 50 to 100 feet, in my experience a single 10 Meter antenna at 100 feet is almost always too high to do much good. Welllll, I think it also makes a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00336.html (9,784 bytes)

13. [TowerTalk] HDR-300 question (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 11:06:00 EDT
<< I installed a well-used HDR-300 last summer to turn a 5 el 20m Yagi (40ft boom) and miscellaneous other smaller antennas on the same mast. The HDR-300 moves the stuff around quite well but there's
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00646.html (9,186 bytes)

14. [TowerTalk] Guying material/cost (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 11:51:59 EDT
With all the talk about the expense of guying (phily and EHS), it might be a good time to remind folks to check out Rohn 55 over 45. I have 110' of 55 with a 20' mast and it's guyed in two places--50
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00075.html (7,364 bytes)

15. [TowerTalk] Ginpole for 20 foot sections (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 16:02:28 EDT
<< You sure? Isn't a hundred-pound load going to weigh 100 pounds no matter how the block and tackle are set up? The load effort on the end of the rope will be reduced but the dead weight of the load
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00321.html (10,853 bytes)

16. [Fwd: [TowerTalk] Ginpole for 20 foot sections] (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 10:50:47 EDT
<< it, Stan and all, Boy, talk about living with misconception for most of a lifetime! Stan is absolutely correct! After reading his description of the experiment and thinking about it, I was pretty
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00348.html (8,717 bytes)

17. [TowerTalk] New Towers (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 12:17:07 EDT
<< Wow you west guys have it made for the US Towers I just checked on the estimated shipping to North Carolina for the HDX-572MDPL tower and the TRX-80HD tilt over "$2,403.58" ouch looks like aluminu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00523.html (8,339 bytes)

18. [TowerTalk] C31XR / CC 402CD Question (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 11:32:47 EDT
<< The Force 12 x40N model 40 meter beams have their secondary resonance at 18 MHz due to the design of the linear loading and are spaced with C31's at distances as small as 8 feet, and inline. There
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00516.html (8,944 bytes)

19. [TowerTalk] Grips vs. clamps?--a 3rd option (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com (JBaumgarte@aol.com)
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:48:03 EST
I had a tree fall on guys to a 100' Rohn 25 tower about ten years ago. Fortunately (?) I had installed only two clamps and they actually pulled through (3/16 EHS). Couldn't believe it, but the tower
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00644.html (7,623 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] [Force 12 Talk] Force 12 80M Sigma vertical problem (score: 1)
Author: JBaumgarte@aol.com
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:46:53 EST
Steve, I have had one of these for several years now and it's worked nicely. I recall having a problem at first while using a F12 balun. I removed that balun and used a simple coax choke balun, and t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00532.html (7,519 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu