Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Jimk8mr@aol.com: 400 ]

Total 400 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [VHFcontesting] [CQ-Contest] What cost and expected benefit tocompete? (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 13:25:03 EDT
If money is an issue, those who really care about a particular contest ought to be willing to chip in a modest amount, in proportion to how much the contest means to them. I'd never pay to support a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00267.html (7,271 bytes)

102. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote Base (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 14:07:08 EDT
The location of the transmitter. This will be addressed in 2006 revised rules. 73 de Bruce, WA7BNM (_bhorn@hornucopia.com_ (mailto:bhorn@hornucopia.com) ) The logical answer as I see it. This might m
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00355.html (7,638 bytes)

103. Re: [CQ-Contest] NA QSO Party first timers results (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 09:58:13 EDT
Jason, Welcome to the world of HF contesting! It's great that you had fun in the NAQP, and I'll be looking forward to working you in future contests. A good thing about HF contests is that there is o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00409.html (8,905 bytes)

104. [CQ-Contest] Ohio QSO Party - Saturday (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 15:38:28 EDT
This Saturday, August 27, is the Ohio QSO Party, sponsored by the Mad River Radio Club. It runs from 1600z to 0400z August 28. Full contest info is available at _www.oqp.us_ (http://www.oqp.us) In a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00418.html (7,558 bytes)

105. [CQ-Contest] Ohio QSO Party - Today! (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 07:52:57 EDT
Today, Saturday, is the Ohio QSO Party, from 1600z to 0400z Sunday (Noon to midnight EDT). As anyone who operates in such events knows, mobile activity is what makes the contest a success. As of this
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-08/msg00436.html (6,671 bytes)

106. Re: [CQ-Contest] Fun With Rules [long, sorry] (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:29:04 EDT
Well, I don't feel insulted by the NCCC's use of multiple stations at a given location. I consider it a mild form of flattery by imitation. Rule 3.4 is not about what constitutes a "station". It just
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00152.html (8,788 bytes)

107. Re: [CQ-Contest] long callsigns (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 08:49:51 EDT
Somebody somewhere can make a callsign as long as they like, like HA800IARU or TG0FRACAP. There's no limit. With stock calls I'd think the limit would be a 2x3 portable in a 2x1 prefix county, like V
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-09/msg00182.html (7,367 bytes)

108. Re: [CQ-Contest] A portable rig for contesting? (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 19:17:01 EDT
With a fairly large probability that I have missed something that the feature gives you, what is it that I am missing that is so important with the the CW use of PTT? The ability to switch relays in
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00062.html (7,758 bytes)

109. Re: [CQ-Contest] Competing in the Daylight (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 09:23:52 EDT
Concerning making logs available for public review, is there a person, or site, to which one can send a log to be posted for public consumption after the log submission deadline? It would be very eas
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00243.html (8,174 bytes)

110. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW. I "get it". (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:31:00 EDT
There's a reason this contest has become so popular - it's REALLY HARD TO WIN. And because it's hard, it requires people who want to really compete to take it very seriously, and that seriousness fil
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00409.html (8,704 bytes)

111. Re: [CQ-Contest] An Observation (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 12:34:33 EST
Gentlemen, it came to my notice during the CQWW SSB Contest that it would be a whole lot easier and quicker if everyone used the correct phonetic alphabet and dropped the ''Guatamalas,Londons and Jap
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00689.html (8,235 bytes)

112. Re: [CQ-Contest] WW SSB on my mind (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 08:24:47 EST
The Maritime Net is not a "check in and ragchew net". Sure, the net control stations call for check-ins and keep the frequency "occupied". I check into the net quite often when in the USA and have be
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00125.html (9,551 bytes)

113. Re: [CQ-Contest] A phonetic that's tough to beat (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 09:22:01 EST
You don't necessarily have to use homonyms or other weird phonetics to come up with a doozie. My favorite using standard phonetics, is that of WZ0Z. Try "Whiskey Zulu Zero Zulu" a few times in a row
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00225.html (6,662 bytes)

114. Re: [CQ-Contest] Memorable SS Fun-etics (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 08:58:33 EST
My favorite from this weekend was W4 Kermit The Frog. I wonder if he worked K8 Big Bird. As for the problems if your call ended in FU, I had an experience along those lines this year in the Pennsylva
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00612.html (8,466 bytes)

115. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1 ponters for CQWW (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 09:16:05 EST
Hey, the rules for WPX were changed to allow points for WPX and that is a great contest. Why not CQWW? -- In CQ WW there are six multipliers available for working your own county. Maybe it will also
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00725.html (8,528 bytes)

116. Re: [CQ-Contest] Zero point Qs (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 18:48:21 EST
Once we get done with the question of CQWW DX Contest, perhaps we can consider the problem of the Florida QSO Party. After the first few hours FQP gets pretty slow, with the only new stuff to work be
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00815.html (7,668 bytes)

117. Re: [CQ-Contest] The Chosen (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 09:34:35 EST
The recent death of Eugene McCarthy reminded me of a great line attributed to him, concerning the qualities of an ideal football coach. Especially with all the kvetching here on CQ-Contest in recent
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00407.html (7,207 bytes)

118. Re: [CQ-Contest] The irony of Operating Time [was: Logging Time [was:Contest... (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 22:46:47 EST
To paraphrase some wise sage, if you're filling up a band map before the start of the contest, you're probably losing. If you're ragchewing away, holding a good frequency, you may be winning. 73 - Ji
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00124.html (7,188 bytes)

119. Re: [CQ-Contest] Worst contesting location? (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:32:18 EST
Never been there or done that, but I'd think that northwest UA0 would be pretty bad. You get the same far northern auroral problems as in JW, etc., but when the band does finally open, you're still j
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00339.html (8,842 bytes)

120. Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP and 75 Meters (score: 1)
Author: Jimk8mr@aol.com
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 19:22:47 EST
Was there a typo here? I never realized the DX window was 100 khz wide, from 3700 to 3800, half of which we USA guys can't use anyway. I suspect he meant 3790 to 3800 - ten KHz. If so, I wouldn't con
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00438.html (8,387 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu