Mail Archive Search: <+from:K3BU@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:K3BU@aol.com: 112 ]

Total 112 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] Re: About the incivility of our posts (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com; Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 12:45:17 EST; any more of that guy's arrogant/ pompous/ bombastic postings. Seems like his rudeness should be enough to get him booted off the list. (I tried to determine who the list manager is with no luck) I wa; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00926.html (8,478 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec / Scott (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com; Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 20:24:35 EST; to maximum productivity. 2. I honestly think that Yuri and Scott together as a team in the next WRTC could beat anything the rest of the world has to throw at them! There was a time that this was an; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00890.html (8,035 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Re: Using Orion with existing 961 PSU (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com; Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:26:39 EST; understand why the orion pulls 24 A when it has (I'm told) the same p.a. as the jupiter in it. << My Orion draws 19 - 20 A in CW key down at full power 100W. RX draws almost 3 A, when the software is; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00874.html (7,180 bytes)
4. Re: [TenTec] A test of Orion's external CW keying (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 22:33:38 EST; although the scope reading did not change at all between those three indications.<< Thanks Sinisa for elaborate test and results. Quite a variations. I found that delays in keying within the radio, p; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00851.html (7,820 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] Re: About the incivility of our posts (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:47:50 EST; Sorry about the typo, should read "You guys..." Yuri _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00843.html (6,647 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Re: About the incivility of our posts (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com; Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:39:42 EST; somewhat ill-tempered (not to mention technically deficient - sorry) and we responded in kind. << OK, let me elaborate. I am for exchange of ideas, arguments, discussing problems, explaining or learn; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00841.html (12,029 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] Re: TenTec Digest, Vol 14, Issue 68 - Sensitivity Issues (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com; Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 20:37:34 EST; I am getting really tired of this atmosphere here. I try to address the subject, provide explanation and suggestions for improvement. As a response I get "imaginary reality" and the above crap. You w; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00794.html (8,569 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] Re: TenTec Digest, Vol 14, Issue 68 - Sensitivity Issues (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com; Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 18:58:59 EST; But take that receiver to the ocean front, put directional antennas on it, use specialized receiving antennas and you will find that you NEED gain on low bands. Or beaming with good directional anten; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00790.html (10,195 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] ...and to Yuri (K3BU)? (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com; Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 23:07:08 EST; you...anyway your choice of liquid refreshment was top notch...it's not easy to win any contest, especially with a hangover.. :>]<< It was probably more like 15 dB, I had to keep the attenuator on :-; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00754.html (7,912 bytes)
10. Re: [TenTec] ...and to Yuri (K3BU)? (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com; Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 18:40:57 EST; of SOABHP and SOABHP-Assisted.<< Soooo? Does it mean that you can only win with Orion? How about congratulations to me, check http://lists.contesting.com/archives/html/CQ-Contest/2004-02/msg00421.htm; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00748.html (7,704 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] Re: TenTec Digest, Jupiter SENSITIVITY (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com; Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 17:49:39 EST; No, it doesn't help! It is true if everybody would be using Inverted Vee antenna in a city environment on low bands. The lower you go on frequency, the more noise you encounter (you "don't need sensi; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00747.html (9,647 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] Orion web log etc. (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:27:30 EST; make it dot NET :-) should know your own address, no? Yuri _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tente; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00542.html (6,473 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] Orion-skipping firmware upgrades (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com; Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 07:31:08 EST; Yep, you don't need previous version, it is complete overwrite . Had hickups with my 1.639, took third try to complete. RIT/XIT and BP rates are still ganged. Yuri ___________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00390.html (6,721 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] Omni6+ mods: 125hz cw filter and 2 khz roofing filter (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com; Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:35:58 EST; there were the two at 6 MHz and 9 MHz. Was the 600 Hz roofing filter a hardware change? I assume that this dedicates the radio to narrowband modes as a 600 Hz roofing filter would be too narrow for v; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00308.html (9,601 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] Omni6+ mods: 125hz cw filter and 2 khz roofing filter (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com; Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 12:55:40 EST; tried this and it did not bring the expected results and as I recall, it was due to noise (but don't pin me down on that - it was a while back when I read it). << Depends on band conditions and situa; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00298.html (9,370 bytes)
16. Re: [personal] Re: More Re: [TenTec] Orion redefines the meaning of... AGC OFF (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com; Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 09:08:17 EST; list. That is poor etiquette. Now I must apologize to the everyone for my mistake. I do apologize to you attributing to you comments you did not make. Reposting private email should not be done witho; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00201.html (7,237 bytes)
17. Re: More Re: [TenTec] Orion redefines the meaning of ... AGC OFF (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com; Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 09:04:40 EST; Who is comparing radios? What was being compared is the receiver sensitivity, noise floor and weak signal discernability. Subject came up and was being discussed. Fact is that K6SE found K2 hearing s; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00199.html (9,510 bytes)
18. Re: More Re: [TenTec] Orion redefines the meaning of ... AGC OFF (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com; Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 23:13:17 EST; In a message dated 2/7/04 11:00:18 PM Eastern Standard Time, n1eu@yahoo.com writes: It's a 2-1/2 minute clip of a slow weak cw signal starting with the Orion and switching back and forth with audible; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00192.html (9,327 bytes)
19. Re: More Re: [TenTec] Orion redefines the meaning of ... AGC OFF (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com; Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 22:51:50 EST; many of your points. I think if the radio cost about $1000 less some of us would be singing a different tune. No doubt the radio may have the best receiver but that is where it may end.<< Thanks John; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00187.html (9,992 bytes)
20. Re: More Re: [TenTec] Orion redefines the meaning of ... AGC OFF (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com; Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 22:27:47 EST; How would you classify NQ5T offerings? I have not seen any remarks as far as his postings go. I remember and been quiet about his "evaluation" of my Orion Contester's Ergonomics review. Is there diod; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00185.html (9,095 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]