Mail Archive Search: <+from:K3BU@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:K3BU@aol.com: 92 ]

Total 92 documents matching your query.

61. TopBand: Signals on 1.640 MHz: DFW? (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 07:44:34 -0400 (EDT); identify themselves as being for Dallas/Ft. Worth (DFW) airport, and it definately was strongest on my Southwest Beverage. Can someone confirm this? Those are low power transmitters used around the; /archives//html/Topband/1997-09/msg00344.html (7,371 bytes)
62. TopBand: Re: Why the duct? (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 18:54:42 -0400 (EDT); << If the signals duct, why does the saltwater path help? Because it is a uniform surface of water, helping to maintain uniform layer of duct. In a uniform or smoothly curved duct, we get smooth refr; /archives//html/Topband/1997-07/msg00026.html (8,249 bytes)
63. TopBand: Re: Why the duct? (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Tue, 8 Jul 1997 22:02:25 -0400 (EDT); I was trying to come up with some spare time to continue expanding and exploring on my original "ducting" article in June 1980 CQ Magazine, but (un)fortunately got busy with other more pressing stuff; /archives//html/Topband/1997-07/msg00036.html (9,429 bytes)
64. TopBand: Re: Why the duct? (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Thu, 10 Jul 1997 00:25:42 -0400 (EDT); <<(de K3BU:) on de W8JI: Why? If the propagation is from ducting, the ground beyond ground wave distance from the antenna will have no effect at all on the signal. >> I am looking for two things that; /archives//html/Topband/1997-07/msg00045.html (8,366 bytes)
65. TopBand: Prevailing angles of propagation (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 12:09:20 -0400 (EDT); There seem to be desire to get the lowest possible angle of radiation from the antennas in hope of achieving super DX signal performance. This is probably fuelled by the experiences on higher bands,; /archives//html/Topband/1997-07/msg00134.html (9,001 bytes)
66. TopBand: Fox-Tango or International Radio ? (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Wed, 7 May 1997 08:45:40 -0400 (EDT); IRC - also known as Fox Tango etc. filters are now in W7 land under W2VJN. They just started operation and have a home page at www.qth.com/inrad. 73 Yuri K3BU, VE3BMV -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contes; /archives//html/Topband/1997-05/msg00027.html (6,940 bytes)
67. TopBand: Forwarded message from K2WI (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Tue, 4 Mar 1997 11:41:08 -0500 (EST); I did, late second night of the contest, when it was becoming obvious that QRM of the DXwindow is not going away, and besides 17 other stations that hogged the frequency, very few were fortunate to; /archives//html/Topband/1997-03/msg00022.html (8,972 bytes)
68. TopBand: Proposed band plan for 160 (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Sun, 9 Mar 1997 22:41:05 -0500 (EST); I do not think there is a need to segment the band for various classes. There is no need for digital modes on 160 (too noisy anyway), they have all the other bands, especially WARC bands were allocat; /archives//html/Topband/1997-03/msg00077.html (7,906 bytes)
69. TopBand: 焙 Conversio (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Mon, 31 Mar 1997 18:48:09 -0500 (EST); Anyone out there who can tell me if is there any formula to translate Microhenries into MHz..? >> (convert inductance to frequency? must be some catch to it!) A: I know the formula, but will tell onl; /archives//html/Topband/1997-03/msg00200.html (7,137 bytes)
70. TopBand: Fwd: Contest Venting, Windows, etc. (long) (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Mon, 24 Feb 1997 12:46:18 -0500 (EST); -- Forwarded message: Subj: Contest Venting, Windows, etc. (long) To: <topband@contesting.com> Date: 97-02-24 12:44:37 EST From: K3BU To: btippett@ctc.net << Please no more posts on this issue until; /archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00360.html (16,512 bytes)
71. TopBand: CQ 160 m SSB Ethics Summary - Recommendations (long) (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Fri, 28 Feb 1997 09:48:26 -0500 (EST); This is the summary of responses to TopBand Reflector and to me re: CQ 160 m SSB Contest ethics. Some of this applies also to 80 and 40 m situations. Complete replies and my original posting are at K; /archives//html/Topband/1997-02/msg00435.html (13,846 bytes)
72. TopBand: TS870 and TS570 RX mod (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Sun, 5 Jan 1997 18:42:44 -0500; As announced before, I have a simple mod for TS870 RX antenna switching. The same mod should apply to TS570, electrical diagram for ANT1 and ANT2 switching is the same, connection points might not be; /archives//html/Topband/1997-01/msg00116.html (7,447 bytes)
73. TopBand: HEARD better on xmit antenna, propagation (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Wed, 22 Jan 1997 00:05:36 -0500 (EST); << I think some of the odd signal strength behavior is due to multiple paths open at once, maybe close to each other in azimuth. Since the paths are so long, their signal strengths vary considerably,; /archives//html/Topband/1997-01/msg00378.html (10,343 bytes)
74. TopBand: Yuri propagation (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 22:47:42 -0500 (EST); Hey you "bouncers" I did not say that signals can not be reflected, by sky, dirt, moon or polished mirrors. I found that it looks like we are more ducting, than reflecting. You accept that its happen; /archives//html/Topband/1997-01/msg00421.html (7,355 bytes)
75. TopBand: Re: Proximity to Trees (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Fri, 13 Dec 1996 23:08:17 -0500; Trees can be classified as semi-antennas (semiconductor). If you have no wire, tree is better than nothing (as radiator). But if you use a tree as an antenna support, try to keep the wire away from t; /archives//html/Topband/1996-12/msg00239.html (7,673 bytes)
76. TopBand: Proximity to Trees (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Sun, 15 Dec 1996 11:12:55 -0500; Maybe I wasn't too clear on the bamboo - wire situation. When I used the wire vertical the bamboo pole was used as a support, where the wires first were just taped to the bamboo. They were three wire; /archives//html/Topband/1996-12/msg00259.html (9,751 bytes)
77. TopBand: CLIPPERTON L PROBLEM (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Tue, 17 Dec 1996 01:07:07 -0500; << I have a Clipperton L amp and the output is down quite a bit on 160. It looks like the tank coil doesn't have enough turns for 160 comparing it to 80. Do you know anything about this and any sugge; /archives//html/Topband/1996-12/msg00298.html (9,939 bytes)
78. TopBand: 101 Uses for AOL disks (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Tue, 17 Dec 1996 20:38:42 -0500; I'm sorry for posting this, but made me laught so hard that I was not able to let my baloony vertical out tonight. (That's what my college son sent me instead of getting his ham radio license.Hi) I a; /archives//html/Topband/1996-12/msg00311.html (13,034 bytes)
79. TopBand: TS870 RX Ant switching (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Tue, 24 Dec 1996 15:12:21 -0500; I have figured out way to use ANT1 connector on TS870 for RX antennas. It requires one diode to be plugged into a cable socket. If interested please email me directly. I apologize for the bandwith an; /archives//html/Topband/1996-12/msg00433.html (6,784 bytes)
80. TopBand: Dentron Amp Topband power (score: 1): Author: K3BU@aol.com (K3BU@aol.com); Date: Sat, 9 Nov 1996 23:56:31 -0500; I just got Dentron Clipperton L. With top cover off it gives abt 200 W more on 20 m (1500W). Have not loaded it on 160, but looking at the tank coil, it is too close to covers. Looks like replacement; /archives//html/Topband/1996-11/msg00132.html (6,950 bytes)

Current List: 61 - 80
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]