Mail Archive Search: <+from:K4BEV@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:K4BEV@aol.com: 40 ]

Total 40 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] A call to action (score: 1): Author: K4BEV@aol.com; Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 13:14:55 EDT; As I understood the question, it was how to attract more hams to contesting, not how to attract more people into ham radio. It seems to me that Amateur Radio Contesting is getting to be way more like; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2007-03/msg00503.html (10,339 bytes)
2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Incorrect conclusions about un-assisted versusassisted (score: 1): Author: K4BEV@aol.com; Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 21:13:09 EST; ... it is the totally wrong conclusion to jump to. The reason that you see typically lower un-assisted scores at the top is simple. The large percentage of the top operators are NOT using assistance.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00479.html (8,567 bytes)
3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Casual vs organized "alerting" (score: 1): Author: K4BEV@aol.com; Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 12:14:21 EST; "Just as you CANNOT take unsolicited info, act upon it and be unassisted." I'm mystified by your conclusion. If you didn't arrange for it, and it is truly unsolicited, how can you be assisted? ** A l; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-12/msg00037.html (8,048 bytes)
4. Re: [CQ-Contest] WRTC Spot/Log Correlation (score: 1): Author: K4BEV@aol.com; Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 19:35:16 EDT; This is no reason to scrap the SO category. As someone pointed out recently, SO Assisted is an oxymoron. 2. Recognise that if not SO, the category must be some flavour of multi-op - and drop the ambi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-09/msg00056.html (8,614 bytes)
5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Not in LOG (score: 1): Author: K4BEV@aol.com; Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 09:01:27 EDT; I sent him an e-mail and he confessed that he had a computer crash shortly after our QSO and he lost our QSO plus few more U.S. contacts on 80 in his LOG. Fair to me? Not really. But S!*T happens som; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-07/msg00615.html (6,545 bytes)
6. Re: [CQ-Contest] carpal tunnel (score: 1): Author: K4BEV@aol.com; Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 09:13:24 EST; Today there is hardly any excuse. Maybe not, but I suffered with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome from 15 years of typing computer code - and I'm NOT a female. A shot of Cortisone and a couple of weeks later i; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00581.html (8,022 bytes)
7. [CQ-Contest] SO MO Assisted (score: 1): Author: K4BEV@aol.com; Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 09:23:17 EDT; There is a lingual image trying to transfer the message assisted is history, make only one single op category. Roger that thought! We should have SINGLE op and MULTI op categories. The category now c; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00194.html (7,327 bytes)
8. Re: [CQ-Contest] A portable rig that would serve wellforcontestingtoo? (score: 1): Author: K4BEV@aol.com; Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2005 21:52:42 EDT; I'm surprised that the Kenwood TS-570 isn't being recommended as a portable contesting rig. Is there a reason for this? Additional power supply needed perhaps?? The internal antenna tuner works fine; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-10/msg00135.html (7,141 bytes)
9. Re: [CQ-Contest] How frequent to ID? Every QSO? No way! (score: 1): Author: K4BEV@aol.com; Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:04:59 EST; 4. Have you accounted for busted QSO's caused by Packet which cannot be corrected since you don't sign your call? This will NOT be a problem if you use one of two "operating aids": 1. Have your buddi; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00243.html (9,672 bytes)
10. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Intentional QRM (score: 1): Author: K4BEV@aol.com; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 18:16:59 EST; Not having much time this weekend I decided to see how close to a sweep I could get with the least amount of QSOs without resorting to packet (got 78x78). Because of this I was tuning the bands const; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00606.html (7,739 bytes)
11. Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet Cheerleaders (score: 1): Author: K4BEV@aol.com; Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 08:32:49 EST; Although I don't use the spotting networks, they have knocked me out of some QSOs along the way. Try working a weak station LP or QRP and have a sudden pile-up on top of you. If the spotting network; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00301.html (9,030 bytes)
12. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation entirely through IP? (score: 1): Author: K4BEV@aol.com; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 08:48:54 EDT; 73, Don - K4BEV _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-08/msg00114.html (8,026 bytes)
13. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: [SECC] DX Participation in NAQP Contests (score: 1): Author: K4BEV@aol.com; Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:47:00 EST; << I don't see the problem with having multiple classes... <snip> Besides the person who wins the most elite class - SOHP - will still get all the recognition they get now.... >> Not to mention their; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00378.html (8,270 bytes)
14. Re: [CQ-Contest] truck lanes (score: 1): Author: K4BEV@aol.com; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 23:05:25 EST; << Or rather like truck lanes, the only places multi-multis are allowed,..... Would they be allowed to SnP the rest of the band? They are going to run out of other multi-multis to work pretty quick.; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00341.html (7,443 bytes)
15. [CQ-Contest] K2 and contesting - Impressions? (score: 1): Author: K4BEV@aol.com; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 14:21:50 EST; I'd like to hear from anyone using a K2 in contests, especially RTTY and CW. Your impressions of this radio - esp the receiver - under contest conditions will be appreciated. Thanks and 73, Don - K4B; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00324.html (7,402 bytes)
16. Re: [CQ-Contest] Operating phone on crowded bands (score: 1): Author: K4BEV@aol.com; Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 12:09:46 EST; A few phone contests back a couple of the "80m pig dudes" tried to run me off my frequency. Actually they succeeded -- sort of. I was so pissed that I sat there and listened to them till they IDd...; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00310.html (8,160 bytes)
17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet/Dx summit spots (score: 1): Author: K4BEV@aol.com; Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 09:26:39 EST; Not "everyones" score and/or fun gets maximized. Try unassisted LP sometime and see how much FUN it is when about a zillion stations start calling the guy you're trying to work in the middle of the Q; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00081.html (8,853 bytes)
18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting Computer --- Feedback (score: 1): Author: K4BEV@aol.com; Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 00:18:24 EST; Maybe not. I have a 4 port Belkin switch which is an RFI magnet. A manual switch may work, but then again.... Don - K4BEV -- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland! THE OFFICIAL FILM of; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00464.html (7,468 bytes)
19. [CQ-Contest] Contesting from the basement (score: 1): Author: K4BEV@aol.com (K4BEV@aol.com); Date: Wed Jul 23 18:01:12 2003; With a raised floor you can run the cables under the floor, leaving strategic floor panels removable for maintenance, adding cables, etc. This is how many commercial installations are set up and it i; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00256.html (8,105 bytes)
20. [CQ-Contest] A contest that is welcomed? (score: 1): Author: K4BEV@aol.com (K4BEV@aol.com); Date: Fri Jun 6 20:17:36 2003; Mine's in my truck (IC-706 - KJ7U screwdriver - VHF vert) . What about some ideas for effective contest antennas that can be used from a pick-up? Sort of like VHF Field Day. Except for an FM xcvr for; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00101.html (7,070 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]