Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:K4BEV@aol.com: 40 ]

Total 40 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] How frequent to ID? Every QSO? No way! (score: 1)
Author: K4BEV@aol.com
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:04:59 EST
4. Have you accounted for busted QSO's caused by Packet which cannot be corrected since you don't sign your call? This will NOT be a problem if you use one of two "operating aids": 1. Have your buddi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-01/msg00243.html (9,672 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] Operating phone on crowded bands (score: 1)
Author: K4BEV@aol.com
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 12:09:46 EST
A few phone contests back a couple of the "80m pig dudes" tried to run me off my frequency. Actually they succeeded -- sort of. I was so pissed that I sat there and listened to them till they IDd...
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00310.html (8,160 bytes)

3. [CQ-Contest] K2 and contesting - Impressions? (score: 1)
Author: K4BEV@aol.com
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 14:21:50 EST
I'd like to hear from anyone using a K2 in contests, especially RTTY and CW. Your impressions of this radio - esp the receiver - under contest conditions will be appreciated. Thanks and 73, Don - K4B
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00324.html (7,402 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] truck lanes (score: 1)
Author: K4BEV@aol.com
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 23:05:25 EST
<< Or rather like truck lanes, the only places multi-multis are allowed,..... Would they be allowed to SnP the rest of the band? They are going to run out of other multi-multis to work pretty quick.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00341.html (7,443 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: [SECC] DX Participation in NAQP Contests (score: 1)
Author: K4BEV@aol.com
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:47:00 EST
<< I don't see the problem with having multiple classes... <snip> Besides the person who wins the most elite class - SOHP - will still get all the recognition they get now.... >> Not to mention their
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-01/msg00378.html (8,270 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation entirely through IP? (score: 1)
Author: K4BEV@aol.com
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 08:48:54 EDT
73, Don - K4BEV _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-08/msg00114.html (8,026 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet Cheerleaders (score: 1)
Author: K4BEV@aol.com
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 08:32:49 EST
Although I don't use the spotting networks, they have knocked me out of some QSOs along the way. Try working a weak station LP or QRP and have a sudden pile-up on top of you. If the spotting network
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00301.html (9,030 bytes)

8. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS Intentional QRM (score: 1)
Author: K4BEV@aol.com
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 18:16:59 EST
Not having much time this weekend I decided to see how close to a sweep I could get with the least amount of QSOs without resorting to packet (got 78x78). Because of this I was tuning the bands const
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-11/msg00606.html (7,739 bytes)

9. [CQ-Contest] Single op technology aided. (score: 1)
Author: K4BEV@aol.com (K4BEV@aol.com)
Date: Fri Jan 24 18:39:30 2003
Why not an SO1R category then? Kinda like TS. Don - K4BEV
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00306.html (6,183 bytes)

10. [CQ-Contest] The answer to everybody's question (score: 1)
Author: K4BEV@aol.com (K4BEV@aol.com)
Date: Sun Jan 26 12:10:35 2003
I don't believe that most of us who are in favor of an SO1R category expect to win the class. I sure don't. I'm not competing with W4AN and similar stations in the contests, I can't. I would (emphasi
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00380.html (7,130 bytes)

11. [CQ-Contest] Re: 40M Band Plan (score: 1)
Author: K4BEV@aol.com (K4BEV@aol.com)
Date: Fri Mar 7 22:29:13 2003
Although I didn't get to play in the ARRL DX, I did get to a chance to listen some. I'm not a very good CW op, but I had no trouble copying either the SSB DX stations or the CW guys on the same frequ
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00066.html (6,880 bytes)

12. [CQ-Contest] Callsign Advantages (score: 1)
Author: K4BEV@aol.com (K4BEV@aol.com)
Date: Tue Mar 11 08:36:18 2003
I've seen several posts on this topic recommending Zulu as a good letter to have in your call. I don't like to even think about how many times I had to repeat Zulu - Zebra - Zanzibar on phone! If I g
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00094.html (7,910 bytes)

13. [CQ-Contest] Figuring TakeOff Angles? (score: 1)
Author: K4BEV@aol.com (K4BEV@aol.com)
Date: Sat Mar 15 09:41:09 2003
I should probably know this, but: How can I figure out the best angles for various bands from my qth to another at a specific time? For example: West Tennessee to Florida on April 26 & 27, 2003. I do
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00183.html (6,497 bytes)

14. [CQ-Contest] 2003 WPX SSB - NA Final Claimed Scores (score: 1)
Author: K4BEV@aol.com (K4BEV@aol.com)
Date: Sun May 11 23:32:48 2003
Sounds like one of those frame selling gimmicks to me. Then again - An empty frame on the wall might be some extra incentive to stay in the chair. Or you could just print up your own certificate. Who
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00128.html (7,533 bytes)

15. [CQ-Contest] A contest that is welcomed? (score: 1)
Author: K4BEV@aol.com (K4BEV@aol.com)
Date: Fri Jun 6 20:17:36 2003
Mine's in my truck (IC-706 - KJ7U screwdriver - VHF vert) . What about some ideas for effective contest antennas that can be used from a pick-up? Sort of like VHF Field Day. Except for an FM xcvr for
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-06/msg00101.html (7,070 bytes)

16. [CQ-Contest] Contesting from the basement (score: 1)
Author: K4BEV@aol.com (K4BEV@aol.com)
Date: Wed Jul 23 18:01:12 2003
With a raised floor you can run the cables under the floor, leaving strategic floor panels removable for maintenance, adding cables, etc. This is how many commercial installations are set up and it i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00256.html (8,105 bytes)

17. Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting Computer --- Feedback (score: 1)
Author: K4BEV@aol.com
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 00:18:24 EST
Maybe not. I have a 4 port Belkin switch which is an RFI magnet. A manual switch may work, but then again.... Don - K4BEV -- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland! THE OFFICIAL FILM of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-11/msg00464.html (7,468 bytes)

18. Re: [CQ-Contest] Packet/Dx summit spots (score: 1)
Author: K4BEV@aol.com
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 09:26:39 EST
Not "everyones" score and/or fun gets maximized. Try unassisted LP sometime and see how much FUN it is when about a zillion stations start calling the guy you're trying to work in the middle of the Q
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00081.html (8,853 bytes)

19. [CQ-Contest] I can feel the heat! Fwoosh! (score: 1)
Author: K4BEV@aol.com (K4BEV@aol.com)
Date: Wed Mar 28 10:24:45 2001
I had written an entire (long) response concerning my feelings on this subject when it hit me: If its considered to be OK to ask to be spotted then you and I am diminishing our possible scores by not
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-03/msg00343.html (9,037 bytes)

20. [CQ-Contest] TU? (score: 1)
Author: K4BEV@aol.com (K4BEV@aol.com)
Date: Mon Apr 2 10:57:08 2001
In CW tests some S&P stations send TU exchange. Some just send the exchange. I usually include the thank you -- and mean it. Sometimes I send R TU exchange. When I'm running (I use the term loosely)
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2001-04/msg00009.html (7,399 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu