Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:K7GCO@aol.com: 206 ]

Total 206 documents matching your query.

141. [TowerTalk] Tilting Boom Design--A Solution 40 years old (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 07:25:23 EDT
mount of boom close to the top of the tower that I'd like to tilt and be able to reach an bearing A heavy duty tilt mount can be made from two pieces of steel channel, four bolts & nuts, & two u-bolt
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00012.html (11,445 bytes)

142. [TowerTalk] Alternative tower coatings (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 04:04:08 EDT
In a message dated 5/3/01 8:34:30 PM Pacific Daylight Time, ke3yt@usa.net writes: << Hi Val, You're absolutely correct in saying that, maybe I should have been more clear at first though. My main obj
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00109.html (10,176 bytes)

143. [TowerTalk] Re:MFJ Good Stuff (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 08:03:35 EDT
In a message dated 5/3/01 4:51:28 PM Pacific Daylight Time, wy6k@yahoo.com writes:<< Maybe we need to start a "Why I hate MFJ" reflector! I would, of course, be one of the first subscribers. However,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00112.html (12,850 bytes)

144. [TowerTalk] Re: Quad wires (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 09:29:43 EDT
I will take the bet! I never had wire fail in Quad from flexing. There is (almost) no flexing when antenna is properly strung, with just enough tension to keep the wires from flopping or flexing. In
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00148.html (10,844 bytes)

145. [TowerTalk] Baluns and SWR (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 05:33:29 EDT
<< In a message dated 5/17/01 9:39:16 AM Pacific Daylight Time, tmartin@chartermi.net writes: << I have read so many posts about baluns and SWR that I am thoroughly confused! I am going to be erectin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00505.html (18,186 bytes)

146. [TowerTalk] Baluns and SWR-2 (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 13:20:56 EDT
Transmission line baluns are poor baluns for most applications. They are much more impedance and load critical than choke baluns, more lossy, and don't do as good a job. They are more difficult to m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00553.html (21,527 bytes)

147. [TowerTalk] thoughts about property layout (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 15:44:37 EDT
In a message dated 5/26/01 11:20:34 AM Pacific Daylight Time, n9rla@yahoo.com writes: << I have an almost identical situation here. The power feed from the pole to the weather head at the house runs
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00560.html (10,903 bytes)

148. [TowerTalk] Proposed Changes to 40 Meters (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 18:46:03 EDT
_________________________________________________________ To go from 7.0 to 6.9 MHz, just add approximately 5.5 inches to the end of each element. It does not have to be aluminum tubing, just a piec
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00593.html (9,304 bytes)

149. [TowerTalk] Connectors--Weak Fingers (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 06:14:55 EDT
In a message dated 4/4/01 6:52:41 AM Pacific Daylight Time, b_bradfield@yahoo.com writes: << Hi Ian - - The silver plated PL-259's are DEFINITELY easier to solder. Texas Towers (http://www.texastower
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00109.html (14,414 bytes)

150. [TowerTalk] Petrezewski (sp?) array .. (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2001 18:56:41 EDT
Actually, the parasitic systems work fine with 4 or even three dipoles, although the beamwidth increases proportionately. Wx0B and I are arguing offline about which system shows better F/B and gain
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00122.html (9,554 bytes)

151. [TowerTalk] Re:Beam Orientation in Wind--How To Eliminate It. (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2001 07:52:27 EDT
In a message dated 4/7/01 5:01:28 PM Pacific Daylight Time, n3rr@erols.com writes: << Ford, Turn your beam so that it is "radiating" into the wind. That's the least load on both the elements and the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00175.html (14,871 bytes)

152. [TowerTalk] Pinning Masts (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 12:09:18 EDT
the AND the forces will find the next weak link in the chain. In this case it's gears or brake in the rotator. Ouch! Cheers, Steve K7LXC Tower Tech You are right Steve but those of us who use Prop Pi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00485.html (8,808 bytes)

153. [TowerTalk] Coax (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 21:22:56 EDT
<< What coax should I use for running it underground? How deep? Should it be enclosed in PVC pipe or similar? Any help would be appreciated. Mike N3HR The designation ''AU"at the end of the coax numb
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00587.html (8,389 bytes)

154. [TowerTalk] Coax-open wire line (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2001 22:28:04 EDT
<< I highly recommend Davis RF Buryflex. It is 213 and is direct burial. There are two rules of thumb: one: one foot which is the depth that a shovel can accidentally cut through it; and two: 18 inch
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00589.html (8,301 bytes)

155. [TowerTalk] Changing Beam Polarity (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 08:39:06 EDT
ERIC: The main problem here is when you rotate the boom for vertical polarization the mast will be exicted with RFand upset the vertical pattern and F/B. You have to mount the entire beam on one side
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00595.html (9,799 bytes)

156. [TowerTalk] Buried coax or not (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 07:25:39 EDT
Coax under ground has many enemies from all the comments I've read on TT. Cable TV runs their coax on messenger cables mostly out of necessity. That's equivalent to going up the tower and to the beam
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00613.html (7,982 bytes)

157. [TowerTalk] House Entry (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 21:05:38 EDT
In a message dated 4/29/01 5:21:33 PM Pacific Daylight Time, w6ter@worldnet.att.net writes:<< I am wondering about other ideas for house entry of hardline (1/2"), rotor cables and control lines. Here
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00620.html (9,284 bytes)

158. [TowerTalk] Re: Question on Spacing for Ladder Line--and Match Box Tuners (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 19:49:43 EDT
In a message dated 4/30/01 8:42:04 AM Pacific Daylight Time, swebber@lucent.com writes:<< Hello there.... Saw your response in regard to making ladder line, and had a question. I am going to make som
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00644.html (11,883 bytes)

159. [TowerTalk] Re: Question on Spacing for Ladder Line--and Match Box Tuners (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 21:15:30 EDT
Jim that is a very good question and that will be answered also. This is the 51st e- mail today I've sent. Typical spacings are 4-6" which gives a range of about 400-600 ohms Zo depending on the wire
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00648.html (8,932 bytes)

160. [TowerTalk] Matching 75 ohm hardline for 3 bands (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2001 16:03:24 EST
am I right in thinking that the general answer would be to make the 75-ohm feedline a multiple of a half-wavelength at the lowest operating frequency, and that the worst situation would be if the 75
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00710.html (9,103 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu