Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:K7GCO@aol.com: 206 ]

Total 206 documents matching your query.

81. [TowerTalk] Dipping with 259B and such (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 18:04:51 EDT
<< Yes! or the Measurements corp. (Boonton) Model 59, or the PRM-10, the Navy version. They are all basically the same, using a real acorn tube osc. and going up to 400+ MHz. Vert sensitive, and a jo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00507.html (8,738 bytes)

82. [TowerTalk] Shortened Dipole on 160M (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 04:29:48 EDT
<< In a message dated 9/18/01 6:02:31 PM Pacific Daylight Time, ve9aa@nbnet.nb.ca writes:<< Frank, et al Guess I missed the original post and the subsequent ones, but FWIW, I've tried hundreds of ant
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00538.html (12,382 bytes)

83. [TowerTalk] Shortened Dipole on 160M (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 06:36:27 EDT
<< Another concept is to make it long enough to a "Create 160 Ohm" Rr feedpoint and match it with 90 ohm coax. This improves the ratio of Rr/RLoss for the same radial system and that is always benefi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00539.html (8,692 bytes)

84. [TowerTalk] Shortened Dipole on 160M (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 09:36:58 EDT
Brian: I thought I'd have to explain this even more and didn't do it enough. The 1/4 wave 90 ohm stub matches 50 ohms to 160 ohms which I suggested adjusting the L antenna Rr to making it longer than
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00541.html (12,869 bytes)

85. [TowerTalk] Shortened Dipole on 160M (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 14:10:43 EDT
In a message dated 9/19/01 7:20:46 AM Pacific Daylight Time, alsopb@gloryroad.net writes:..<< 1.) This formula assumes a pure resistive load. You don't have that. 2.) Second, where does one get 90 oh
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00549.html (29,334 bytes)

86. [TowerTalk] Cleaning/referb of antennas (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 15:43:00 EDT
In a message dated 9/18/01 9:57:59 AM Pacific Daylight Time, john-k1rc@juno.com writes:<< Hi all, I'm in the process of cleaning up/refurbishing a tribander for the winter season. I cleaned out all t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00627.html (13,381 bytes)

87. [TowerTalk] Cleaning/referb of antennas (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 20:56:22 EDT
<< Now hear me out BEFORE you laugh... and THEN tell me why this isn't a good idea! Ever since the '60s I have used Vaseline on all outdoor antennas. This obviously includes all nuts and bolts, but a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00633.html (11,082 bytes)

88. [TowerTalk] Salt Water, How far is too far? (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 21:15:54 EDT
In a message dated 9/23/01 3:51:25 PM Pacific Daylight Time, kk9a@arrl.net writes: << I tried a vertical array from ZF2 and it worked very well 1 meter from the water. I believe that you need to be c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00634.html (8,471 bytes)

89. [TowerTalk] Cleaning/referb of antennas (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 03:45:51 EDT
<< Hi TT ers Back in the late 50's, my dad and I had a ground plane antenna on the roof of our house. We used silicone in the coax connector to keep water out...it MAY have been suggested in the inst
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00640.html (10,561 bytes)

90. [TowerTalk] Cleaning/referb of antennas (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 14:26:15 EDT
Silicone grease...the clear type used under transistors for heat sinking. Try using the grease in a "Jones" plug, leaving 12v DC power applied continuously between adjacent pins (fuse the leads of c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00652.html (9,741 bytes)

91. [TowerTalk] Shortened Dipole on 160M L Antenna (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 06:42:27 EDT
In a message dated 9/19/01 12:48:28 PM Pacific Daylight Time, alsopb@gloryroad.net writes: << K7GCO. Wrong philosophy. Try the products first in the model and if it doesn't provide any improvment thr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00662.html (17,261 bytes)

92. [TowerTalk] Shortened Dipole on 160M L Antenna (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 15:26:21 EDT
In a message dated 9/25/01 10:20:39 AM Pacific Daylight Time, w5kp@swbell.net writes: << I don't know either of you gentlemen, so pardon me for interrupting, but could you please take the back-and-fo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00668.html (9,458 bytes)

93. [TowerTalk] Silicone grease (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 00:20:57 EDT
In a message dated 9/25/01 7:28:00 PM Pacific Daylight Time, k4bet@bellsouth.net writes:<< There are several types of silicone grease and these different types do react at different frequencies and a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00680.html (8,567 bytes)

94. [TowerTalk] 160m shunt feed followup (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 14:47:39 EDT
In regard to possible BC station interference as outlined below, the BC signal can generate a 2nd harmonic in the receiver. Hi-pass filters that allow passage of frequencies above say 1.7 MHz block t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00760.html (8,377 bytes)

95. [TowerTalk] 3 verticals in line (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 16:28:41 EDT
<< I noticed in the books that an in line 3 vertical assenbly would have the following current magnitudes at a particular phase angle. My question is why is the middle vertical at an magnitude of 2 w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00257.html (7,652 bytes)

96. [TowerTalk] New book announcements (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 12:12:10 EDT
In a message dated 8/13/01 8:34:17 AM Pacific Daylight Time, jack@antennex.com writes:<< In a message dated 8/13/01 7:35:47 AM Pacific Daylight Time, ford@cmgate.com writes: << Any document using Ant
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00296.html (9,830 bytes)

97. [TowerTalk] 75M Rotatable Dipoles,lack of SWR bridges (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 13:26:19 EDT
<< In a message dated 8/14/01 6:04:47 PM Pacific Daylight Time, coneal@ma.ultranet.com writes: << So, the question: Would an 80M inverted V a few feet below the C3XLD have a negative effect on its pa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00360.html (13,027 bytes)

98. [TowerTalk] Wattmeters and 75 ohm Coax (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2001 16:37:50 EDT
<< n a message dated 8/19/01 9:52:28 AM Pacific Daylight Time, W4EF@dellroy.com writes: << Hi Bob, I don't know about 75 ohm options for the Bird 43 or Coaxial Dynamics wattmeters. You might want to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00431.html (9,615 bytes)

99. [TowerTalk] Securing feedlines to tower legs (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 09:45:56 EDT
<< Hi, Jim: Fwiw, I wrap the s/s clamps with tape, and secure the cables to legs. Minimal abrasion that way, they're re-usable, and so on. 73, Dave, K3BHJ That's a good idea but I feel a bit narrow.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00439.html (8,447 bytes)

100. [TowerTalk] Ladder Line and Coax (score: 1)
Author: K7GCO@aol.com (K7GCO@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 00:16:24 EDT
<< An efficient way to ground-feed a 1 or more halfwave inverted V is with a remote controlled L-network. Fair Radio Sales sells a Collins c. 30uH DC motor driven variable-inductor that wurks well fo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00463.html (10,599 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu