Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:KI9A@aol.com: 182 ]

Total 182 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [CQ-Contest] Copying (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 20:37:06 EST
Really??? If I sent you ETT, would you really know if I meant 500, or 100?? What if I meant 100, and you thought wrongly it was 500?? See what I mean? In other words, even if I copy ETT correct, log
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00375.html (10,486 bytes)

122. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public access to logs (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 17:34:58 EST
Another reason why I have 300+ DXCC worked, and about 150 confirmed..I DON'T CARE for the way the ARRL looks upon DXCC as the holy grail. Yes, it needs, and deserves integrity, but, c'mon guys...comm
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-02/msg00633.html (9,093 bytes)

123. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public access to logs (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 16:06:50 EST
OK, so, if I place my log on my website, what then? 73-Chuck KI9A In a message dated 3/2/2008 2:34:52 P.M. Central Standard Time, w4tv@subich.com writes: CQ Magazine becomes an associated party the i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00008.html (9,113 bytes)

124. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public access to logs (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 09:42:04 EST
I'm still confused with this one. I think a VAST majority of DXCC submissions come from a contest like the CQWW!! This publication of logs is one of the silliest threads yet. In this day of computers
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00014.html (12,225 bytes)

125. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public access to logs (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 19:05:33 EST
Actually, I'm doing the opposite. I am subscribing. Seriously, this is such a silly moaning session ( published logs), that I am more & more FOR opening the logs for all to see. In a message dated 3/
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00019.html (8,873 bytes)

126. Re: [CQ-Contest] Public access to logs (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 18:14:00 EST
No, not at all. Here is a little backround of what led up to this.. I am just a lowly WAS/VUCC checker, and I had a guy submit 23, or 28, can't recall, printed EQSL's. I knew what they were, I knew w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00096.html (9,187 bytes)

127. Re: [CQ-Contest] arrl dx ssb spotting report (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 18:31:47 EST
Sweet! I made the cheerleader report! 73-Chuck KI9A In a message dated 3/5/2008 8:23:03 A.M. Central Standard Time, rich@n7tr.com writes: KI9A PJ2T 12 128 9.38 **It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms, and a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00146.html (8,188 bytes)

128. Re: [CQ-Contest] spotting game, changes proposal (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 11:28:55 EDT
Good, in theory, but, considering the very large amount of "casual" contesters, just on looking for DX, it is impractical. Make it too hard to get on a simple thing like the packet cluster, and the c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00390.html (9,481 bytes)

129. Re: [CQ-Contest] Web Poll (Signal reports yes/no) (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 22:22:02 EDT
Hey gang, are we not, as a group, big enough to understand a few things..1) What if run 6 db att? 2) what if I have a filter inline? 3) What if I am in the middle of a 100/hr, with several stations c
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00006.html (9,096 bytes)

130. Re: [CQ-Contest] It's never going to end! (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 12:35:37 EDT
Amen, Brother! I'm about to QRT from the list, it's beginning to BORE me to death with all of the skimmer stuff. yeah, I can delete it, I do, but, that's getting old also, due to the sheer volume of
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-06/msg00500.html (9,695 bytes)

131. Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL DX Phone Results (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:32:38 EDT
At best, I scan thru it. I recall the days of reading it cover to cover, but, haven't done that in years, at least since they nixed most of the contest coverage, in favor of more digital, and other i
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-07/msg00328.html (7,910 bytes)

132. [CQ-Contest] RTTY down low in the band (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 22:22:48 EDT
OK, this will start a fire.. Last Sunday, during the Illinois QSO Party, I was at 7030 +/-, Sunday, about 2200z. I had 6 JARTS RTTY guys fire up, dead center on me. Two things here. 1) Why do the rtt
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-10/msg00185.html (7,337 bytes)

133. [CQ-Contest] European sigs to W9 (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 09:53:45 EDT
I just made pass thru 20 meters, and made a few notes of signal strengths. Obviously not scientific! Rig ICOM 756 PRO3, AGC set slow. No preamp on, 2.4 filter Ant Cushcraft A3 tribander at 25' 1330 Z
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-10/msg00232.html (7,302 bytes)

134. Re: [CQ-Contest] European sigs to W9 (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 23:00:30 EDT
I dunno. I recall at least one year on the mid 90's, that I NEVER even heard EU on 20... 73- Chuck In a message dated 10/26/2008 9:53:47 P.M. Central Daylight Time, w9sz@prairienet.org writes: Condit
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-10/msg00238.html (7,154 bytes)

135. [CQ-Contest] SS exchange & lazy folks (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2008 20:51:36 EDT
Wow, had 3 QSOs so far that the other guy skipped his call in the exchange. the rules clearly state the call IS part of the exchange. if you don't send it, I don't log it. 73- Chuck KI9A **Plan your
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00021.html (7,216 bytes)

136. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS exchange & lazy folks (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 20:26:16 EST
I didn't qsl it...It's not on me to make sure they follow the rules. In my opinion, Mal, they sent an INCOMPLETE exchange, therefore, in being compliant with the rules on my end, it is not a QSO. Try
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00030.html (9,029 bytes)

137. Re: [CQ-Contest] SS exchange & lazy folks (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 17:34:54 EST
Well, I see it different... This is lifted right from the ARRL contest specific rules for SS, look at the very last part. It states clearly how NU1AW would respond to W1AW during a completed QSO. 73-
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00051.html (10,439 bytes)

138. Re: [CQ-Contest] Malicious Interference during SS (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:53:18 EST
Rich, I had this happen to me before on 20..the recorded CQ thing. I actually worked stations, and thanked the offender for giving me a break, and letting him do the work for me, while I logged the p
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00388.html (8,833 bytes)

139. [CQ-Contest] bug in new version of writelog? (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 11:15:31 EST
I posted this on the WL reflector, no responses.... I have ver 10.67B, and while trying to build a carbrillo file for SS, there is NO assisted category in the dropdown. There is only SINGLE OP, MULTI
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00435.html (7,847 bytes)

140. Re: [CQ-Contest] bug in new version of WriteLog? (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:22:06 EST
Negative. Power box only shows HIGH LOW QRP. 73- Chuck In a message dated 11/23/2008 11:17:21 A.M. Central Standard Time, kzerohb@gmail.com writes: I have version 10.68F. The "Operator" dropdown is a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00437.html (9,309 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu