Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:KI9A@aol.com: 182 ]

Total 182 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] Be careful (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2004 12:07:19 EST
Boy, was I wrong. I was completely inadequate. I couldn't use the superstation to its full effectiveness. This years' CW SS, I went to K9SD with the same idea...what I did was finish with a lower sco
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2004-12/msg00730.html (8,861 bytes)

42. [CQ-Contest] SO2R-don't change it! (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com (KI9A@aol.com)
Date: Sun Jan 26 10:17:17 2003
C'mon guys, this is getting old! We can't make seperate classes for EVERYTHING, period! I run a station with low antennas, & a small amp. Jeez, can I get my own class? ;-) But, I did invest in a very
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-01/msg00369.html (6,648 bytes)

43. [CQ-Contest] EO6F & communism (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com (KI9A@aol.com)
Date: Mon Mar 31 17:31:43 2003
Just curious..... Did anyone call "CQ contest, no commies" during the hieght of the cold war? I never heard that. As a matter of fact, I think we, as Hams, had a really neat relationship, no matter w
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-03/msg00313.html (6,190 bytes)

44. [CQ-Contest] Fishy spots in WPX SSB (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com (KI9A@aol.com)
Date: Fri Apr 11 08:48:00 2003
Well, of course not! How can there be? Maybe the sponsor should post a list of "potential" pals? What if the other station is just a guy you heard on before, & say "hello" to, & not a friend? Does th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-04/msg00207.html (9,264 bytes)

45. [CQ-Contest] self spotting vs other cheating (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com (KI9A@aol.com)
Date: Mon May 26 13:09:09 2003
OK, now we have the self spotting deal exposed, which, IMO is great. But.... Really, does self spotting give a station "that" much advantage, at least compared to other forms of cheating, like big po
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00254.html (8,475 bytes)

46. [CQ-Contest] self spotting vs other cheating (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com (KI9A@aol.com)
Date: Tue May 27 18:46:57 2003
Was trying to go with the fact that self spotting IS bad. But, there are other forms of cheating (while all forms are BAD & not accepable), power voilations & packet abuse while claim unassissted are
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00284.html (8,640 bytes)

47. [CQ-Contest] self spotting vs other cheating (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com (KI9A@aol.com)
Date: Wed May 28 17:34:06 2003
Nice idea, but there is an awful lot of non-contesters using packet, ect...
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00300.html (8,027 bytes)

48. [CQ-Contest] Re: Self Spotting in WPXCW (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com (KI9A@aol.com)
Date: Fri May 30 17:50:35 2003
I'd vote fot that, BUT, how the heck do you enforce this?? An awful large amount of NON CONTESTERS use packet, especially during contests, to pick up rare countries, states, & counties. Anyone can ge
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-05/msg00327.html (8,481 bytes)

49. [CQ-Contest] RE: SCOURGES OF CONTESTING, CHAPTER 3 (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com (KI9A@aol.com)
Date: Sat Jul 5 08:56:03 2003
Jukka has this absolutley correct! Everyone is forgetting the reason why we do what we do, FUN! Do I miss the days of working on dupe sheet for hours, & hours after the contest? Nope. Actually, compu
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-07/msg00068.html (8,151 bytes)

50. Re: [CQ-Contest] my FRIEND is spotting me (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 22:28:04 EST
Say what?? At what number of spots does this change from just spotting your pal, to helping him "self spot"??? C'mon guys, this is silly. I hear a friend, whether it is a local, or one of the same JA
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00120.html (9,397 bytes)

51. Re: [CQ-Contest] my FRIEND is spotting me (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 11:22:28 EST
Ah, ok. So, what is the difference between advertising an expedition to a DX location in NCJ, QST, or any one of the many DX newsletters, & asking club members to listen for you. NONE! What if you en
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2003-12/msg00146.html (9,447 bytes)

52. [CQ-Contest] Field day no-coders? (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com (KI9A@aol.com)
Date: Wed May 31 23:21:17 2000
hey gang, I have a question about field day--on the novice/tech station, IF a we use a couple of tech +'s to set up & operate the novice/tech station, using a TECH+ call, can a NO-CODE tech operate &
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-05/msg00000.html (6,358 bytes)

53. [CQ-Contest] S02R? leave it alone... (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com (KI9A@aol.com)
Date: Sun Jun 4 11:26:28 2000
I've been reading the so2r thresd with interest....my opinion is this-leave it alone! Yeah, maybe the guy across town does make more Q's with 2 radio's than I do with only 1. But hell, the guy with a
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2000-06/msg00114.html (6,786 bytes)

54. [CQ-Contest] SS checking.. (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com (KI9A@aol.com)
Date: Sun Mar 7 00:34:57 1999
Wow! Cant belive the hit I took in CW SS after the check. Not real bad, but bad enough that I picked it apart to tell poor typing & poor copy apart. Guess what? I need a typing class -- and I need to
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00067.html (7,737 bytes)

55. [CQ-Contest] WPX views from midwest... (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com (KI9A@aol.com)
Date: Mon Mar 29 19:16:49 1999
Its really too bad some DX now considers this a US QSO party, I made over a 1000Q's this weekend in around 20 hours. Nice rates, lots of DX, and if you have ever operated from the "Blachhole" with lo
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-03/msg00360.html (7,550 bytes)

56. [CQ-Contest] Single Op Rules (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com (KI9A@aol.com)
Date: Wed May 19 22:47:32 1999
<< If I have a "hired gun" to repair this stuff, I can just switch bands while they fix the antenna or run barefoot while they fix the amp. If I do this, aren't I re-classified Multi Op even if the o
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-05/msg00293.html (7,408 bytes)

57. [CQ-Contest] Cut [Serial] Numbers (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com (KI9A@aol.com)
Date: Wed Jun 2 19:09:31 1999
<< copy 4 digit serial numbers (err, number/letters) at 40+ WPM >> I totally agree! I know the pro-arguments to this with the time-saving aspects, I copy 35-40 wpm pretty well, but catching a 4-digit
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-06/msg00036.html (9,078 bytes)

58. [CQ-Contest] Cut [Serial] Numbers (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com (KI9A@aol.com)
Date: Wed Jun 2 19:09:31 1999
<< copy 4 digit serial numbers (err, number/letters) at 40+ WPM >> I totally agree! I know the pro-arguments to this with the time-saving aspects, I copy 35-40 wpm pretty well, but catching a 4-digit
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-06/msg00199.html (9,139 bytes)

59. [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10 Meter Not-In-Log (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com (KI9A@aol.com)
Date: Mon Aug 9 21:55:01 1999
<< According to what I know, you reported back the info correctly yet you typed it wrong.). I would argue in this general case that both stations should get zero points. IMHO, it's a bit, well, I dun
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00078.html (8,860 bytes)

60. [CQ-Contest] ARRL 10 Meter Not-In-Log (score: 1)
Author: KI9A@aol.com (KI9A@aol.com)
Date: Mon Aug 9 21:55:01 1999
<< According to what I know, you reported back the info correctly yet you typed it wrong.). I would argue in this general case that both stations should get zero points. IMHO, it's a bit, well, I dun
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/1999-08/msg00339.html (8,820 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu