Mail Archive Search: <+from:KM9M-ZIG@comcast.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:KM9M-ZIG@comcast.net: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

21. [CQ-Contest] Where's the Challenge? (score: 1): Author: "S. Markowski Jr." <km9m-zig@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 01:53:24 +0000; <snip> I am probably in a minority here, but I would much prefer to give an RST than a serial number. I deal with serial number contests, but really don't prefer them! A serial number requires "one"; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-03/msg00814.html (6,989 bytes)
22. [CQ-Contest] RULES, RS(T) (score: 1): Author: "S. Markowski Jr." <km9m-zig@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 03:00:21 +0000; <snipped> I think the rules say that you have to send a signal report-does it specifically say it has to be a RST report? If not, then I can make up my own signal reporting system, where 59 or 599 me; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-04/msg00045.html (7,724 bytes)
23. [CQ-Contest] CW SS (score: 1): Author: km9m-zig@comcast.net; Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 15:47:09 +0000 (UTC); I too was called by and logged VY1EI. As far as exchanges sent and logged... I have tried, but can't understand why some feel they don't have to either follow the rules (or the norm). People don't wa; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2008-11/msg00090.html (7,256 bytes)
24. [CQ-Contest] Deadlines and Bonus Points (score: 1): Author: km9m-zig@comcast.net; Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 18:14:16 +0000 (UTC); I am in favor of stiff deadlines. I am opposed to bonus points of any kind not related to multipliers , etc occuring within the contest period. I think the log checkers have enough work to do without; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-02/msg00057.html (7,158 bytes)
25. [CQ-Contest] Contest Rule Interpretation (score: 1): Author: km9m-zig@comcast.net; Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 14:40:58 +0000 (UTC); I wonder what the going rate is for an attorney to decipher contest rules: - what do they really mean - how far can you "bend" a rule without violating the rule - which contest rules can you choose; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00038.html (7,211 bytes)
26. [CQ-Contest] WRTC 2010 (score: 1): Author: km9m-zig@comcast.net; Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:27:05 +0000 (UTC); Man.... talk about knocking the joy out of an event. *Hintings of cheating or dishonest strategies, (spotting advantage or disadvantage), *suggestions of changing the WRTC format to a "Sprint" format; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00260.html (7,937 bytes)
27. [CQ-Contest] State of the email list (reflector) (score: 1): Author: km9m-zig@comcast.net; Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 03:47:08 +0000 (UTC); John, you're right regarding nasty-grams and to think before hitting the send key. Most lists like these are moderated, these moderators exercise great restraint. You exercise more than I ever would; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-07/msg00468.html (8,580 bytes)
28. [CQ-Contest] Thoughts on SS CW (score: 1): Author: km9m-zig@comcast.net; Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 16:40:34 +0000 (UTC); Another running of the ARRL November CW Sweepstakes, another return of the contest lawyers interpreting the rules to their liking.. If someone uses a database to fill exchanges and or a CW reader..; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00140.html (8,260 bytes)
29. [CQ-Contest] Incomplete SS Exchange (score: 1): Author: km9m-zig@comcast.net; Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 03:55:17 +0000 (UTC); I'm standing right with W5OV on this. Why change or not follow the rules because a minority feels it might be outdated or archaic? The rules are the rules.. If they affect your rate, they affect ever; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-11/msg00216.html (8,831 bytes)
30. [CQ-Contest] assisted, not assisted, come on... (score: 1): Author: km9m-zig@comcast.net; Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 10:27:05 +0000 (UTC); With the best band high band conditions in years, it warms many hearts to see that the radio-sport lawyers are still on the job interpreting contest rules, and looking for loopholes to get it "their; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-12/msg00002.html (7,578 bytes)
31. [CQ-Contest] KP2MM DQ (score: 1): Author: km9m-zig@comcast.net; Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 02:36:20 +0000 (UTC); Though many feel the DQ is unfortunate, it is what it is. I don't see the contest branch/committee reversing their decision, as I'd bet there was much thought and discussion that occurred before the; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-06/msg00331.html (6,896 bytes)
32. [CQ-Contest] WW SSB Log Acknowledgements (score: 1): Author: km9m-zig@comcast.net; Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 18:05:34 +0000 (UTC); I emailed my paltry log in on 10/30 @ appx 2300z, no confirmation received. Backlogged due to Sandy, or need to send again? Tnx and 73, Zig - KM9M _______________________________________________ CQ-C; /archives//html/CQ-Contest/2012-11/msg00013.html (7,123 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 32
Page: [1] [2]