Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:N2GC@aol.com: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Xtreme Categories (score: 1)
Author: N2GC@aol.com
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:08:21 EDT
I like the new categories except for the remote receiver part. Guys using remote receivers are going to effect the scores and fun of people not in the extreme categories. For instance, if I am SOSB16
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00185.html (8,153 bytes)

2. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQWW Xtreme Categories (score: 1)
Author: N2GC@aol.com
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:21:25 EDT
remote receivers should not be allowed outside either one's zone or country, i.e. no USA east coast stations with west coast receivers. Otherwise it will be a huge advantage for people in places like
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-06/msg00278.html (10,035 bytes)

3. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why Are European Contesters Younger? (score: 1)
Author: N2GC@aol.com
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:47:39 EDT
John, 1) Your age 47 2) Age you got your first license 13 3) Age you started contest operating 13 4) # of years of contest experience 34 I was introduced to ham radio from my father who was a ham.. H
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2009-08/msg00425.html (11,322 bytes)

4. Re: [CQ-Contest] Best SS exchange yet! (score: 1)
Author: N2GC@aol.com
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 00:09:25 -0500 (EST)
Last year I operated SS with 6 year old son in the shack listening. His favorite call was K Zero Dirty Underwear. For days and weeks after that he would run around the house yelling CQ SS K Zero Dirt
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2010-11/msg00385.html (8,285 bytes)

5. Re: [CQ-Contest] Proposal MPMF Contest (more points more fun) (score: 1)
Author: N2GC@aol.com
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 18:15:42 -0400 (EDT)
Nice to see someone thinking outside the box on this subject. (most qso's X most mults = winner) I think a contest with most of your ideas would be very interesting and a lot of fun. Before creating
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2011-07/msg00086.html (15,271 bytes)

6. Re: [CQ-Contest] WARC bands and contesting. (score: 1)
Author: N2GC <N2GC@aol.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 16:40:34 -0400
Make it once a year and make the non-warc bands contest free that weekend. Like me I am sure that many contesters don't have any warc antennas. A warc contest would likely increase antenna sales. Why
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2013-08/msg00025.html (9,988 bytes)

7. Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened (score: 1)
Author: N2GC <N2GC@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 20:15:02 -0500
Id after every contact does level the playing field for everyone in the competition. IMHO I think this would be a good rule. The argument that less QSO's would result is not necessarily true. Looking
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2014-01/msg00185.html (9,002 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu