Mail Archive Search: <+from:N3AWS@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:N3AWS@aol.com: 42 ]

Total 42 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Sept ARRL VHF QSO Party FM & PSK31 (score: 1): Author: n3aws@aol.com; Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 15:27:41 -0400; I am planning a QRP operation from EM50 on 6, 2 and 0.70 meters.? SSB and CW.? I'd love to work others on FM simplex and PSK31 if there is any interest.? For that matter, I'd like to hear from contes; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-08/msg00212.html (7,376 bytes)
2. [VHFcontesting] N3AWS Active from EM50 for contest (score: 1): Author: n3aws@aol.com; Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2007 10:27:17 -0400; I'll be QRP portable from MS Gulf Coast on 50, 144, and 432 MHz USB and CW. Maybe 2 meter FM simplex 73, Jim N3AWS ________________________________________________________________________ AOL now off; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-06/msg00071.html (7,221 bytes)
3. [VHFcontesting] EDZ antennas for portable use (score: 1): Author: n3aws@aol.com; Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:11:05 -0400; Does anyone have experience with EDZ antennas for 6 meters as a portable antenna? I'm contemplating one to use instead of a dipole. It should give some gain if oriented correctly without the complexi; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-04/msg00046.html (7,029 bytes)
4. [VHFcontesting] Elk antennas for rovering (score: 1): Author: n3aws@aol.com; Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 07:17:31 -0400; I am interested in the dual band Elk log periodic that covers 2 meters and 70 cm. Does anyone have any experience with this antenna in a portable or rover setting? How well does the antenna perform?; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-04/msg00029.html (7,039 bytes)
5. Re: [VHFcontesting] Fixing the Captive Rover Problem [was: FixingtheGrid Cir... (score: 1): Author: N3AWS@aol.com; Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 17:09:02 EDT; As I write this, I am looking at the 2005 ARRL January VHF Sweepstakes Results which appear on pages 96-99 in the August issue of QST. When the write-up of the Rover section begins "By moving team pa; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00069.html (7,711 bytes)
6. Re: [VHFcontesting] PACK ROVEing - A New Category Is Needed (score: 1): Author: N3AWS@aol.com; Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 20:15:00 EDT; I agree that this type of operation belongs in a different class from Rover Jim N3AWS _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://li; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-07/msg00106.html (6,711 bytes)
7. Re: [VHFcontesting] Drumming up FM activity for contests (score: 1): Author: N3AWS@aol.com; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 07:44:43 EST; Thanks for the link, Mike. I like your suggestions for contest frequencies--simple and standardized. Your FM Contesting page is right on target for attracting newcomers. 73, Jim N3AWS EM50 __________; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-02/msg00041.html (8,165 bytes)
8. Re: [VHFcontesting] FM Contesting . . . (score: 1): Author: N3AWS@aol.com; Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 12:10:02 EST; concrete proposal to try and snag the FMers in our midst? Think about it--an HT set to scan these frequencies could pick up some extra points for you next VHF contest. Then, take the next step and c; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-02/msg00037.html (10,551 bytes)
9. Re: [VHFcontesting] Drumming up FM activity for contests (score: 1): Author: N3AWS@aol.com; Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 07:00:29 EST; FM simplex wouldn't be my mode of choice for a contest either. But the idea is to try to get the FM only crowd exposed to VHF contesting to hopefully introduce new blood into VHF contests. FM activit; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-02/msg00031.html (7,705 bytes)
10. [VHFcontesting] Drumming up FM activity for contests (score: 1): Author: N3AWS@aol.com; Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 17:09:50 EST; I believe that one of the smartest things wecould do to increase VHF contest participation is to actively promote FM simplex entries and activity. To that end, I think that we need to make some hard; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-02/msg00023.html (7,043 bytes)
11. Re: [VHFcontesting] Where are the Radiosports fans? [was: Roving andHamfests] (score: 1): Author: N3AWS@aol.com; Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 07:40:55 EDT; the viability focus). If applications for this position are being accepted, please put my name in! Jim N3AWS _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-09/msg00012.html (7,117 bytes)
12. Re: [VHFcontesting] Vhf com. members (score: 1): Author: N3AWS@aol.com; Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 20:53:12 EDT; I think a year's gift subscription to QST is a GREAT idea for all first time entries. I also think that an FM only category would compliment the free memberships nicely. I'd also like to thank Ev and; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-07/msg00194.html (6,702 bytes)
13. Re: [VHFcontesting] FM Contesting, ?Elmer bonus? (score: 1): Author: N3AWS@aol.com; Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 18:12:52 EDT; How about a bonus to any entrant that sponsors, encourages, assists, etc. any FIRST ENTRANT to the fray? N3AWS/4 _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesti; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-05/msg00028.html (6,771 bytes)
14. Re: [VHFcontesting] Renewing Interest in VHF Contesting (score: 1): Author: N3AWS@aol.com; Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 20:15:02 EDT; So how do we get the attention of the HF only ops? BTW I do my share of HF contesting, too. Although I got my general in 79, it was almost 20 years before I tried VHF (except for very limited 2 meter; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-05/msg00019.html (7,483 bytes)
15. Re: [VHFcontesting] Renewing Interest in VHF Contesting (score: 1): Author: N3AWS@aol.com; Date: Sat, 8 May 2004 10:42:15 EDT; While this may excite and motivate the current VHF contesters, I don't see this attracting any new blood. I think directing efforts to entice the FM only crowd, HF contesters who never set the band s; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-05/msg00014.html (7,068 bytes)
16. Re: [VHFcontesting] comments on proposed VHF+ rules changes (score: 1): Author: N3AWS@aol.com; Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 07:50:58 EST; My remarks as an ARRL Life Member, casual contester, and occasional attempted rover with poor results: 1. If the ARRL wants to attract the Ic 706/FT-100 crowd to the June Contest, this doesn't seem t; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-03/msg00033.html (7,488 bytes)
17. Re: [VHFcontesting] Re: Rover Circling Solution & ARRL VHF+ contestproposals (score: 1): Author: N3AWS@aol.com; Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 09:50:56 EST; Why not simply say grid circling and captive rovers are OK, but all such stations that engage in this type of operation are ineligible for awards and any records they set will be unofficial. All such; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-02/msg00071.html (7,104 bytes)
18. Re: [VHFcontesting] Choice of Rover Vehicles (score: 1): Author: N3AWS@aol.com; Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 22:07:12 EST; I went with an RV--specifically an Itasca Sunstar. I have used it mobile in state QSO parties, but my one attempt at a VHF contest as a rover was a bust. The RV has lots of advantages including a sec; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-02/msg00007.html (7,439 bytes)
19. [VHFcontesting] Op needed for Wash DC Multi-op? (score: 1): Author: N3AWS@aol.com; Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 22:03:45 EST; I am taking a course in Washington DC and do not wish to miss the VHF Contest next weekend. Any multi-ops that could use another operator? I don't have any equipment with me, unfortunately :^< please; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-01/msg00017.html (6,504 bytes)
20. [VHFcontesting] Garbage messages (score: 1): Author: N3AWS@aol.com; Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 06:38:58 EST; Anyone know why we are getting these garbage messages from the reflector? Is this from a virus or worm infection on someone's computer? 73, Jim N3AWS EM90 ____________________________________________; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00153.html (6,247 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]