Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:NN3W@prodigy.net: 51 ]

Total 51 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers etc (score: 1)
Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <NN3W@prodigy.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:34:17 -0500
You are way, way off base here Rick. There are countless stations that operate this contest for 100,000 or 300,000 points to give to their club score and would like that W mult and would also like th
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00742.html (10,929 bytes)

42. Re: [CQ-Contest] zero pointers etc (score: 1)
Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <NN3W@prodigy.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:37:48 -0500
By the way, NAQP is NOT a domestic only contest. By its very name, it is the NORTH AMERICAN QSO party in which the objective is "To work as many North American stations as possible during the contest
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00743.html (10,355 bytes)

43. Re: [CQ-Contest] 1 pointers for CQWW - More data (was: A PROPOSEDSOLUTION) (score: 1)
Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <NN3W@prodigy.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 12:47:47 -0500
Interesting data Richard. As a compromise, how about the following. This would really affect folks in the USA, Canada, European Russia, Australian Russia, Australia and whatever country is divided up
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-11/msg00798.html (10,381 bytes)

44. Re: [CQ-Contest] Another view for 1-pointers (score: 1)
Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <NN3W@prodigy.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 08:52:47 -0500
This may be true, but isn't part of the rationale to significantly increase participation in a type of contest (RTTY) that is otherwise a distant third to the CW and phone tests? 73 Rich NN3W rules.
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00012.html (8,608 bytes)

45. Re: [CQ-Contest] 160 window in ARRL 160m contest, (score: 1)
Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <NN3W@prodigy.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 15:21:08 -0500
SNIP This part is entirely incorrect. In CQWW, contacts within the same country are certainly permitted. You just don't get point credit for it. OTOH, you do get multiplier credit (country and zone,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00173.html (7,809 bytes)

46. Re: [CQ-Contest] 160 window in ARRL 160m contest, (score: 1)
Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <NN3W@prodigy.net>
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 09:00:44 -0500
I'm aware of that. The point I was rebutting was the claim that intracountry QSOs are not permitted in CQWW. As I said, they most certainly are allowed. 73 Rich NN3W -- Original Message -- From: "joh
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00198.html (10,437 bytes)

47. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking questions (score: 1)
Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <NN3W@prodigy.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 05:04:20 -0500
No. He isn't. Nobody governs the operations of my station except the FCC and the contest sponsor if, and when, I choose to "enter" the contest (i.e., submit a score). If I turn on the radio and hear
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00400.html (10,426 bytes)

48. Re: [CQ-Contest] Why 160m in SS? (score: 1)
Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <NN3W@prodigy.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 23:22:58 -0500
Yah, I know that Jeff N8II spent a little bit of time up on 160. I haven't had a chance to talk to him about it, but it kinda surprised me. In fact, N4RV and I were talking about 160 during one of my
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00457.html (9,431 bytes)

49. Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking questions (score: 1)
Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <NN3W@prodigy.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 23:26:01 -0500
I always thought it'd be humorous to submit a CQWW score with 18 QSOs, 6 country multipliers, and 18 zone multipliers for a net score of Zero. Actually, if you were up in Canada, you could do 24 Qs,
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00458.html (9,788 bytes)

50. [CQ-Contest] WRTC (score: 1)
Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <NN3W@prodigy.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:30:21 -0500
Received my NCJ yesterday and was reading the quick chronology of the WRTC. I remember when the first was done in Seattle. I had semi "disappeared" from ham radio for WRTC 1996, 2000, and 2002. Was t
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2005-12/msg00618.html (7,142 bytes)

51. Re: [CQ-Contest] R: QRP - Get Over It (score: 1)
Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <NN3W@prodigy.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 09:12:50 -0500
SNIP desired state in the exception of JA. :-) simply don't really need just cranks them just curious to my time than answer those. I'm sorry, but I disagree highly with this practice. Perhaps the ha
/archives//html/CQ-Contest/2006-01/msg00083.html (8,707 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu