Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:PaulKB8N@aol.com: 38 ]

Total 38 documents matching your query.

1. Topband: Inverted L or U? (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com (PaulKB8N@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 22:10:53 EDT
Gang, I'm headed to the Carribean for CQWW this fall. I have a very good antenna situation, with two 70' palm trees about 75' apart. I'm thinking that a 145' inverted L ought to work great, but what
/archives//html/Topband/2000-07/msg00035.html (6,856 bytes)

2. TopBand: Re: [TowerTalk] Stealth Wire Vertical (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com (PaulKB8N@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 09:37:56 -0500 (EST)
<< Comment about antenna wires lighting fires in trees is, of course, valid. I totally burned up (left ashes only) the fiberglass end inulators on my 160 traped dipole a couple of years ago. Found th
/archives//html/Topband/1997-11/msg00263.html (7,629 bytes)

3. Topband: Short, Fat Vertical (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 14:08:41 EST
I'm pretty much restricted to a maximum height of 40' for any antenna I install on my covenant-restricted lot. I have thought about an inverted L, but I also wonder if I can achieve a greater effecti
/archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00184.html (7,809 bytes)

4. Topband: Conditions Last Night (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 09:42:26 EST
Last night I got back from my music gig at about 0645Z. As I tuned the band I thought I heard a loud signal calling DF2PY. I soon realized it was DF2PY, pounding in at a solid 599 calling CQ with no
/archives//html/Topband/2006-12/msg00309.html (7,068 bytes)

5. Topband: Inductively Loaded Dipole vs. Inverted U dipole (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 00:45:40 EST
I am trying a few different antenna configurations and would like to get some expert opinion on which of two antennas might work best. I have about 150' between two trees and I wonder if an inductive
/archives//html/Topband/2007-01/msg00020.html (7,468 bytes)

6. Topband: A Great Life lesson - K6SE (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 08:17:08 EDT
The recent passing of K6SE (and others in the past several months) provides us all with a poignant lesson. Earl has done great things for many of us around the world, but how many of us have taken th
/archives//html/Topband/2007-05/msg00003.html (7,025 bytes)

7. Re: Topband: The Miracle Band (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 08:49:45 EDT
Last night I had my earliest-ever fall-season contact with Europe. I found S59A last night at 0538Z. For many of you, this is no big deal. For me it is amazing. I run an Omni Six at about 70W to a 19
/archives//html/Topband/2007-09/msg00076.html (6,842 bytes)

8. Topband: Mag Loop for Receiving (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:06:59 EDT
I've not seen much mentioned about using a magnetic loop as a receiving antenna. I built one for 80M that was a 6' diameter made with PVC and found it to be a fabulous receiving antenna, I could clea
/archives//html/Topband/2007-09/msg00087.html (7,356 bytes)

9. Re: Topband: One way propagation (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:55:08 EST
I have a slightly less scientific take on this phenomenon. I was reminded of it when I was on 15M prior to the start of CW Sweepstakes. As I tuned up and down a very quiet band, loud signals appeared
/archives//html/Topband/2007-11/msg00084.html (9,079 bytes)

10. Topband: Fwd: One way propagation (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:22:23 EST
** See what's new at http://www.aol.com _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
/archives//html/Topband/2007-11/msg00111.html (6,154 bytes)

11. Re: Topband: Elevated Radial Efficiency - an inordinately long post (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:03:04 EST
Gents: I've read this who thread and have to say that I think there are two points of view that both deserve due consideration. The first is the viewpoint of intense scientific measurement, the secon
/archives//html/Topband/2007-11/msg00273.html (10,343 bytes)

12. Re: Topband: 1/8 wave vertical (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 08:03:45 EST
but I've had so many 160 QSOs that were just on the margin, I can't help but think that 1dB shouldn't be neglected. The human ear cannot tell a 1dB difference, but the receiver AGC sure can! Paul, K5
/archives//html/Topband/2007-12/msg00197.html (8,030 bytes)

13. Re: Topband: 1/8 wave vertical (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 13:05:07 EST
WRONG! WRONG! WRONG! Mistatement of reality. It depends completely on the conditions under which the 1 dB change is made. Let's be a little more cordial, please! Something like, "..in most cases, a o
/archives//html/Topband/2007-12/msg00201.html (8,801 bytes)

14. Topband: It Isn't Supposed to Work (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 12:21:10 EST
Gang, I've done a lot of antenna experimenting over the years and tried many things that should not theoretically work. I've wrestled with trying to design a good 160M antenna system in my covenant-r
/archives//html/Topband/2008-01/msg00187.html (9,026 bytes)

15. Topband: Radiant Barrier (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 15:19:23 EDT
I saw a pretty convincing demo of how a radiant barrier can cut summer A/C costs, and I've committed to having the work done. The radiant barrier consists of a heavy latex coating that is infused wit
/archives//html/Topband/2008-04/msg00010.html (7,245 bytes)

16. Topband: ON4ATL? (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:19:04 EST
I managed to pull out a QSO out of S9 QRN last night with who I thought was ON4ATL, although the call doesn't show up in QRZ.com or anywhere else on the web. Anyone have any idea if this is a valid s
/archives//html/Topband/2009-01/msg00225.html (7,078 bytes)

17. Topband: DK2FF? (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 10:10:22 EDT
After a long, dry summer, we've been having a lot of rain shower activity (with associated QRN) here in South Texas. I've been monitoring the band occasionally late at night for EU activity, and brie
/archives//html/Topband/2009-10/msg00081.html (6,502 bytes)

18. Re: Topband: My experiences with G5RV antennas (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:37:03 EDT
Not so fast! The antenna that I currently have in use is closer to G5RV dimensions than it is to a dipole. It is about 180' long, center fed and up only 30'. I spend maybe two or three hours on 160M
/archives//html/Topband/2009-10/msg00352.html (8,912 bytes)

19. Topband: Tee versus L versus Straight radials (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 12:54:45 EST
Gang, I am yet another guy with a radial problem, not a lot of space and various impediments in different directions. I do, however, have a nice wooden fence around that is conducive to tacking down
/archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00063.html (7,234 bytes)

20. Topband: Spiral Top Hat (score: 1)
Author: PaulKB8N@aol.com
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 16:00:36 EST
Gang, Thanks for the info on radials, I've put out a bunch of short ones around the base and a few longer ones wherever they would fit. KV8Q's very respectable ARRL 160 score using the K6MM short hel
/archives//html/Topband/2009-12/msg00107.html (7,198 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu