Mail Archive Search: <+from:Phil.Cooper@cwgg.cwplc.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:Phil.Cooper@cwgg.cwplc.com: 43 ]

Total 43 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [RTTY] Datong AF filter (score: 1): Author: Phil Cooper <Phil.Cooper@cwgg.cwplc.com>; Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 12:43:41 +0100; Hi Peter, The short answer is YES! I have a 756Pro, and I have an old BARTG R5 audio filter between the rig and the soundcard. Try it and you will see how much of a difference it makes to the waterfa; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-10/msg00048.html (7,856 bytes)
2. Re: [RTTY] LoTW certification (score: 1): Author: Phil Cooper <Phil.Cooper@cwgg.cwplc.com>; Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 08:48:45 +0100; Hi Bill and the group, You said: ".............Remember that non-ARRL countries (eg everything but the US and Canada) have to go through a much more rigorous process to obtain their initial LoTW cert; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-05/msg00118.html (8,664 bytes)
3. Re: [RTTY] addresses (score: 1): Author: Phil Cooper <Phil.Cooper@cwgg.cwplc.com>; Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 14:38:29 +0100; Hi all, My own experience has told me that you cannot rely on just one site for addresses. QRZ is probably the better known, but it often pays to check Buckmaster as well. I also tend to check the K4; /archives//html/RTTY/2005-05/msg00100.html (7,512 bytes)
4. [RTTY] LoTW stats (score: 1): Author: Phil Cooper <Phil.Cooper@cwgg.cwplc.com>; Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:03:55 +0100; Hi all, Saw Patrick's stats from LoTW, and I too am amazed at the return rate, especially for RTTY. Today is Fri, 1 Oct 2004 UTC You are GU0SUP You have 31,325 QSO records You have 4,259 QSL records; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-10/msg00003.html (7,372 bytes)
5. [RTTY] RE:UKDX Contest & condx (score: 1): Author: Phil Cooper <Phil.Cooper@cwgg.cwplc.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 13:36:15 +0100; Hi all, Despite being a committed (my XYL says I SHOULD be!) RTTY contester, I couldn't summon the desire to operate in this one. There seemed to be a distinct lack of anything promoting this contest; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-07/msg00078.html (9,054 bytes)
6. [RTTY] ANARTS (score: 1): Author: Phil Cooper <Phil.Cooper@cwgg.cwplc.com>; Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 11:16:41 +0100; Hi all, I also fell foul of not entering my Zone, and then getting flustered when I saw all contacts were worth ZERO points! I ended up fiddling last years log, deleteing all the contacts and using t; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-06/msg00063.html (9,595 bytes)
7. [RTTY] RE:the KC5YKX comments (score: 1): Author: Phil Cooper <Phil.Cooper@cwgg.cwplc.com>; Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:02:01 +0100; Hi all, Reid, your sentiments are great, but have you ever tried that path? I have tried this (in a polite and friendly manner) on a couple of occasions, and each time I have suffered a tirade of abu; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00270.html (8,319 bytes)
8. [RTTY] MMTTY settings (score: 1): Author: Phil Cooper <Phil.Cooper@cwgg.cwplc.com>; Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:41:32 +0100; Hi all, After having confirmed my thoughts with Oba san JA7UDE, it may be useful to realise that there are other factors that will have an effect on how well MMTTY copies a signal. Firstly, the volum; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00256.html (8,431 bytes)
9. [RTTY] "Email failed" message (score: 1): Author: Phil Cooper <Phil.Cooper@cwgg.cwplc.com>; Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 09:21:19 +0100; Hi all, Over the last week, when I have posted messages to the RTTY reflector, I get my message back, plus one from postmaster@net66.com (wherever that is) with the following text: - Email Message Er; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00254.html (7,619 bytes)
10. [RTTY] RE: Lousy signals (score: 1): Author: Phil Cooper <Phil.Cooper@cwgg.cwplc.com>; Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 09:17:43 +0100; Hi Tony, Yes, I agree that there are some VERY bad signals out there, with spurs all over the place, and signals that chase all over the bands due to AFC and NET. BUT, I also have to say that most so; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00253.html (9,087 bytes)
11. [RTTY] RE: odd signals + recordings (score: 1): Author: Phil Cooper <Phil.Cooper@cwgg.cwplc.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:37:23 +0100; Hi all, The idea of a repository of RTTY signals under diverse conditions sounds great, and it would be fairly easy for each of us to do a short recording of such signals (presumably only AFTER we ha; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00226.html (9,562 bytes)
12. [RTTY] RE: W1ZT, propagation and T33C (score: 1): Author: Phil Cooper <Phil.Cooper@cwgg.cwplc.com>; Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 15:15:22 +0100; Hi George and the group....... Well, the ritual is NOT mine, but was deduced from several sources, all of which claim it works! It involves the cooperation of several willing virgins, but they seem a; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-04/msg00159.html (8,939 bytes)
13. [RTTY] RE: 3B9C (score: 1): Author: Phil Cooper <Phil.Cooper@cwgg.cwplc.com>; Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 13:17:11 +0100; Hi all, (Tuesday), where some of the team left for home, and new members arrived. This may have been partly responsible for the lack of RTTY on that day. I think you will find that there will be more; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00430.html (8,167 bytes)
14. [RTTY] RE: OH2AQ (score: 1): Author: Phil Cooper <Phil.Cooper@cwgg.cwplc.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:55:47 -0000; Hi again all, OK, I now know it is the OH2AQ site, and not just me. Thanks to all who replied. 73 de Phil GU0SUP ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely f; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00033.html (7,117 bytes)
15. [RTTY] OH2AQ ?? (score: 1): Author: Phil Cooper <Phil.Cooper@cwgg.cwplc.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:36:35 -0000; HI all, Is it me, or is the OH2AQ webcluster down? 73 for now Phil GU0SUP ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom th; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00031.html (7,468 bytes)
16. [RTTY] RE Makrothen Contest (score: 1): Author: Phil Cooper <Phil.Cooper@cwgg.cwplc.com>; Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:30:25 -0000; Hi Scott, and all, You might want to check out http://www.dxatlas.com/Default.asp as this is a neat bit of software, but not free for long term use, but it does have a 30-day trial period. Alternativ; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-03/msg00020.html (7,766 bytes)
17. [RTTY] EU1SA observation (score: 1): Author: Phil Cooper <Phil.Cooper@cwgg.cwplc.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:03:16 -0000; Hi all, Walt mentioned: disappointing. You can do this with MMTTY. I also wonder whether MixW or TrueTTY can do it? If the stations using it were mostly former CIS stations, then one of these program; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-02/msg00220.html (7,608 bytes)
18. [RTTY] RE: propagation during XE test (score: 1): Author: Phil Cooper <Phil.Cooper@cwgg.cwplc.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 16:26:28 -0000; Hi Dirk and Pat, I can vouch for the lack of propagation on the Saturday evening! I only managed to work 6 or 7 W's and that was hard work. I tried to work Shelby K4WW, and when he wasn't hearing me,; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-02/msg00116.html (7,818 bytes)
19. RE: [RTTY] CABRILLO TOOLS HELP (score: 1): Author: Phil Cooper <Phil.Cooper@cwgg.cwplc.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 08:40:23 -0000; Hi Jeff and all, As you may have seen, there IS a problem with using the Tools with Win XP. You have to get the Java application, and it took me a while to find it. It is there on the Windows site, b; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-01/msg00343.html (9,125 bytes)
20. [RTTY] RE: Polar bears (score: 1): Author: Phil Cooper <Phil.Cooper@cwgg.cwplc.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 08:46:40 -0000; Hi Chen, and the group, Nice one (or should that be n-ice one??). I hate to disagree, but the bears' fur is not white! It is actually pigment-free and transparent with a hollow core. They look white; /archives//html/RTTY/2004-01/msg00248.html (7,530 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]