Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ROBKEL@aol.com: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Re: 204BA Rattle (score: 1)
Author: ROBKEL@aol.com (ROBKEL@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 13:29:30 EST
I have a 203BA That Rattled. It turned out to be the the hair-pin attachment on the boom. It loosened, and the hair-pin wire rattled against the boom. Good luck Bob, W5LT
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00238.html (6,269 bytes)

2. [Towertalk] General Questions about tower strength (score: 1)
Author: ROBKEL@aol.com (ROBKEL@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 22:57:59 EST
I have to add my two cents worth: A manufacturers' base design is usually based on "standard soil conditions", which is something like 2000 lbs/sq ft if memory serves. If the local conditions are low
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00519.html (7,876 bytes)

3. [Towertalk] Re: Antenna Advice verse 15 (score: 1)
Author: ROBKEL@aol.com (ROBKEL@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 20:46:03 EDT
I did not know the TH-11 could cover 6m! :^) Bob, W5LT
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00465.html (6,269 bytes)

4. [Towertalk] Re: SteppIR Element Placement (score: 1)
Author: ROBKEL@aol.com (ROBKEL@aol.com)
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 21:14:47 EDT
Director - Driven = 89.5 " Driven - Reflector = 102.5" I think the SteppIR is a BIG step in the right direction. As far as tuning goes, it is a no commpromise design. You can have a resonant antenna
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00503.html (8,260 bytes)

5. [Towertalk] Re: SteppIR Performance (score: 1)
Author: ROBKEL@aol.com (ROBKEL@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 22:51:06 EDT
I note that in the latest SteppIR (Fluidmotion) ad (Oct QST, p. 154), they clearly state the (modeled) performance. The lower F/R values at the less than optimum spacing of the higher frequency bands
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00597.html (6,429 bytes)

6. [Towertalk] Re: Towers in Hurricanes (score: 1)
Author: ROBKEL@aol.com (ROBKEL@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 23:34:31 EDT
It is my understanding that Andrew was the driving force that created the Rev F update to EIA/TIA-222. Many towers designed to earlier revisions failed when they weren't supposed to. Also, the windzo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00752.html (6,616 bytes)

7. [Towertalk] RE:Help locating freestanding tower (score: 1)
Author: ROBKEL@aol.com (ROBKEL@aol.com)
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 20:35:45 EDT
Troy, et al: Regarding a free standing tower, you might check out www.heightstowers.com. They make a very nice series of aluminum towers, complete with engineering specs, and a Fold-over kit that mak
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00236.html (7,393 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] MFJ-269 vs AEA CIA-HF Question (score: 1)
Author: ROBKEL@aol.com (ROBKEL@aol.com)
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 21:15:37 EST
HI: Anyone out there had first hand experience with both of these units? I have read the reviews and still cannot make up my mind. I do not need the UHF feature of the MFJ-269. It seems that the AEA
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00078.html (7,336 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] Question about triband Quad. (score: 1)
Author: ROBKEL@aol.com (ROBKEL@aol.com)
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 21:22:58 EST
I have recently put together a 2 element triband quad. 20 & 15 M work good, with a under 2.0:1 over full band (<1.4 over most). 10m VSWR is unacceptably high (3:1 or so over full band. I have checked
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00079.html (8,447 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] Re: Universal Tower (score: 1)
Author: ROBKEL@aol.com (ROBKEL@aol.com)
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 12:21:05 EST
Nathan et al: I have had two Heights Towers, one for over 30 years. I just took the old one down and replaced it with a new one. The old design, which is similar to Universal, used relatively thin wa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00253.html (7,682 bytes)

11. [TowerTalk] Re: Aluminum Masts (score: 1)
Author: ROBKEL@aol.com (ROBKEL@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 10:04:48 EST
Hello All: Aluminum is a appropriate material to use for many purposes, including masts, towers, airplanes. The suitability for a given purpose is controlled by the DESIGN, not the material. I have j
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00286.html (7,884 bytes)

12. [TowerTalk] re:Non-traditional antenna designs (score: 1)
Author: ROBKEL@aol.com (ROBKEL@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 18:58:17 EST
Hello: Speaking of non-traditional antennas (or maybe more accurately: novel designs): Check out the tunable yagi at www.fluidmotion.ws. This is by far the best idea I have seen for an multi band yag
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00650.html (7,705 bytes)

13. [TowerTalk] re:Best wire (Was: Who makes Flexweave wire) (score: 1)
Author: ROBKEL@aol.com (ROBKEL@aol.com)
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 19:16:07 EST
My experience says the best all round antenna wire (if you can find and afford it)...is stranded phosphor-bronze. We used it at Collins Radio for (very long) trailing wire antennas. It is exceptional
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-12/msg00293.html (7,074 bytes)

14. [TowerTalk] TailTwister Bolt Pattern Template (score: 1)
Author: ROBKEL@aol.com (ROBKEL@aol.com)
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 20:05:10 EST
I need to obtain a mounting bolt drill template for a TailTwister. I bought a rebuilt one from Norm's Service, and the manual did not include the template. The tower mounting shelf is for the 4 bolt
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-11/msg00585.html (7,306 bytes)

15. [TowerTalk] Aluminum Fatigue (score: 1)
Author: ROBKEL@aol.com (ROBKEL@aol.com)
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 14:25:22 EST
Hi All: I could not resist a few comments on the aluminum fatigue question. My Reference is "Aluminum Structures" by Kissell & Ferry, which is an understandable design book based on the Aluminum Asso
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00679.html (8,944 bytes)

16. [TowerTalk] Galvanized Anchor bolts (score: 1)
Author: ROBKEL@aol.com (ROBKEL@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 14:16:35 EDT
Hello: I am looking for a source for high strength, galvanized 1" anchor bolts. I have seen various sources for HS bolts/rod (plain) and galvanized standard steel bolts/rods; but not both in combinat
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-08/msg00385.html (7,108 bytes)

17. [TowerTalk] Mast Comparison Tables (score: 1)
Author: ROBKEL@aol.com (ROBKEL@aol.com)
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 1998 22:16:40 EDT
A simplified mast trade-off study I thought I would make a small contribution to the famous aluminum vs steel discussion. In the same vein as Kurt, NI6W, put forth earlier, I propose a 'Figure of mer
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00676.html (10,700 bytes)

18. [TowerTalk] Re:Seperating aluminum tower (score: 1)
Author: ROBKEL@aol.com (ROBKEL@aol.com)
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 23:53:55 EDT
Bill: I have a Heights tower that I have had down only once in its 30 yr life. Had a problem then and wound up damaging some welds trying to part it. Since then I have thought many times about how to
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00440.html (7,540 bytes)

19. [TowerTalk] Anchor Bolts: How deep? (score: 1)
Author: ROBKEL@aol.com (ROBKEL@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 1998 11:49:45 EDT
I am planning to re-work (enlarge) my concrete base to support a greater overturning moment for a self-supporting tower. I have been looking at a lot of tower base designs trying to figure out how de
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00484.html (7,673 bytes)

20. [TowerTalk] re:Sevick (W2FMI) Baluns and Ununs (score: 1)
Author: ROBKEL@aol.com (ROBKEL@aol.com)
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 1998 14:31:53 EST
Hi Charlie: I have been looking at a similar problem for my rotatable 40M dipole. I want to have a resonant 30M dipole (about 48ft), then switch it to center loaded 40M (via relay). I have looked at
/archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00387.html (9,109 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu