Mail Archive Search: <+from:RadioIR at charter.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:RadioIR: 69 ] [ at (Too many documents hit. Ignored) ] [ charter.net: 401 ]

Total 69 documents matching your query.

21. [SECC] ARRL 160 KU8E Single Op LP (score: 97): Author: RadioIR at charter.net (K4SAV); Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 08:05:46 -0600; ..."Frustrating to hear so many loud W6/W7's - some 20 dB over - and have them CQ in your face."...... Remember most of these stations are using directive receive antenna, and if they get lazy and do; /archives//html/SECC/2006-12/msg00031.html (8,230 bytes)
22. [SECC] More in common than different (score: 97): Author: RadioIR at charter.net (K4SAV); Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 10:34:00 -0500; ..."500 feet of #14 insulated wire is less that $20.00 at Lowe's so that's the way I am going.".... -- I see you haven't been to Lowes lately. You need to double that plus add a little. I'm really gl; /archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00020.html (12,550 bytes)
23. [SECC] Contest videos (score: 97): Author: RadioIR at charter.net (K4SAV); Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2006 22:09:11 -0500; These are VERY interesting contest videos. WRTC at Bled Solvenia 2000. Lots of big name contesters appear on camera. You will need a fast internet connection. It's 27 minutes long. http://video.googl; /archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00029.html (6,551 bytes)
24. [SECC] Alabama Contest Group and SECC Club Circle (score: 97): Author: RadioIR at charter.net (K4SAV); Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 22:52:28 -0500; Good post Jeff. I knew after the Ca QSO party I was going to have to make a decision of which club to select when submitting my score. I have been teetering on the fence all evening, and watching to; /archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00054.html (14,017 bytes)
25. [SECC] 80 meters (score: 97): Author: RadioIR at charter.net (K4SAV); Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 19:55:03 -0500; It's called tuning your antenna with your feedline. See http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp/notuner.htm; /archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00111.html (7,910 bytes)
26. [SECC] SS Antenna (score: 97): Author: RadioIR at charter.net (K4SAV); Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:03:47 -0500; No, you got the message correctly. That optimum angle of 40 to 80 degrees elevation for him becomes 20 to 35 degrees for us. So if you are going to have a reflector, better put it behind the antenna; /archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00141.html (8,736 bytes)
27. [SECC] SS Antenna (score: 97): Author: RadioIR at charter.net (K4SAV); Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:14:36 -0500; One other note on the subject: That reflector under the antenna he described is a waste of time. At the angles he is interested in, it adds less than 0.5 dB gain vs a dipole at 40 feet. There are oth; /archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00142.html (9,923 bytes)
28. [SECC] Counterpoise anyone? (score: 97): Author: RadioIR at charter.net (K4SAV); Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:06:38 -0500; Yeah, I saw that, but passed based on a comment W8JI made about using this type wire. Here is his quoted comment: "The very thin porous overlay on standard MIG wire will disappear in any condition wh; /archives//html/SECC/2006-10/msg00162.html (8,191 bytes)
29. [SECC] 2006 IARU (score: 97): Author: RadioIR at charter.net (K4SAV); Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 09:59:03 -0500; Call: K4SAV Operator(s): K4SAV Station: K4SAV Class: SO CW HP QTH: 08 Operating Time (hrs): 6.6 Summary: Band Mode QSOs Pts Sec 7 CW 69 307 17 14 CW 86 350 31 21 CW 55 229 17 Total 210 886 65 Score 5; /archives//html/SECC/2006-07/msg00040.html (6,308 bytes)
30. [SECC] WRTC guys (score: 97): Author: RadioIR at charter.net (K4SAV); Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 18:27:37 -0500; I would like to say that it was a real pleasure working all the WRTC stations. What a great bunch of really good ops. You could just quickly spit out your call and they all picked it up first time wi; /archives//html/SECC/2006-07/msg00050.html (6,269 bytes)
31. [SECC] Simple Antenna for 6 Meters that Works (score: 97): Author: RadioIR at charter.net (K4SAV); Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 14:39:20 -0500; Most books or authors state that -- This doesn't sound correct to me. A signal from Europe to W3 land at 90% probability of arrival at 20 to 23 degrees angle doesn't seem right. It's also not what is; /archives//html/SECC/2006-06/msg00061.html (9,942 bytes)
32. [SECC] Simple Antenna for 6 Meters that Works (score: 103): Author: RadioIR at charter.net (K4SAV); Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 18:46:05 -0500; Stacks are good things when you are over flat ground. As Lee noted, you can select different antenna combinations to suit the band conditions. The big contest stations have known this for a long time; /archives//html/SECC/2006-06/msg00065.html (11,394 bytes)
33. [SECC] Simple Antenna for 6 Meters that Works (score: 97): Author: RadioIR at charter.net (K4SAV); Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 20:51:20 -0500; No I am not in the mountains. I am on the top of a rolling hill surrounded by miles of fresh water and flat land. The grade of the slope is only about 3 degrees. The antenna solution was no accident.; /archives//html/SECC/2006-06/msg00068.html (9,768 bytes)
34. [SECC] Simple Antenna for 6 Meters that Works (score: 97): Author: RadioIR at charter.net (K4SAV); Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 21:16:31 -0500; ..."I say again a stack will beat any single antenna 90% of the time...period...de Rick nq4i"... Over flat ground I will agree with you, and for MOST other locations I would also agree, but there are; /archives//html/SECC/2006-06/msg00069.html (12,477 bytes)
35. [SECC] Simple Antenna for 6 Meters that Works (score: 103): Author: RadioIR at charter.net (K4SAV); Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 09:37:45 -0500; Your 10 meter stack at a 0.57 wavelength spacing is not a close spaced stack. The 20 meter stack you are considering at 0.36 wavelength spacing is a close spaced stack. The answers you get from YO sh; /archives//html/SECC/2006-06/msg00075.html (16,726 bytes)
36. [SECC] Alabama QSO Party - KU8E/m - SO Rover Unassisted (score: 97): Author: RadioIR at charter.net (K4SAV); Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 21:05:27 -0500; Jeff I was interested in the ways the scores were figured, since N1MM Logger doen't do it correctly, so I checked your totals. Yours don't seem correct either (maybe it's me). I get 238 CW QSOs for y; /archives//html/SECC/2006-04/msg00105.html (8,582 bytes)
37. [SECC] Alabama QSO Party (score: 97): Author: RadioIR at charter.net (K4SAV); Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 21:27:23 -0500; Call: K4SAV Operator(s): K4SAV Station: K4SAV Class: SOAB LP CW QTH: AL, Morgan County Operating Time (hrs): 6.7 Summary: Band QSOs -- 160: 0 80: 22 40: 105 20: 105 15: 0 10: 0 -- Total: 232 33 state; /archives//html/SECC/2006-04/msg00106.html (6,931 bytes)
38. [SECC] Dayton Contest Dinner (score: 97): Author: RadioIR at charter.net (K4SAV); Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 19:14:22 -0600; Hey, that's nice to know. I wondered what ever happened to K4BVD. I even looked him up on QRZ once and found that his call now belongs to a club. So I thought, another OT has gone QRT. It's nice to k; /archives//html/SECC/2006-03/msg00140.html (6,976 bytes)
39. [SECC] ARRL DX CW score (score: 97): Author: RadioIR at charter.net (K4SAV); Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 21:44:01 -0600; ARRL DX Contest, CW Call: K4SAV Operator(s): K4SAV Station: K4SAV Class: SOAB HP ASSISTED QTH: AL Operating Time (hrs): 34 hrs Summary: Band Qs Pts Cty 1.8 38 114 33 3.5 137 411 65 7 413 1233 92 14 4; /archives//html/SECC/2006-02/msg00069.html (7,037 bytes)
40. [SECC] Crazy spots (score: 97): Author: RadioIR at charter.net (K4SAV); Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 11:44:46 -0600; Anyone notice all those crazy spots Sunday afternoon? After a few legitimate spots of 6V6U, the tube craze started with spots like 6AU6, 5U4GB, and 3CX1500. Then there was another legitimate spot RG9; /archives//html/SECC/2006-02/msg00074.html (6,927 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]