Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:RadioIR@charter.net: 445 ]

Total 445 documents matching your query.

201. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna/Tower Grounding (Lightning Protection) (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 13:23:46 -0600
I think all you guys have the concept down correctly, but this term "single point ground" has always been a major point of confusion. It is a terrible misnomer. I actually refuse to use it. Instead I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00182.html (12,530 bytes)

202. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna/Tower Grounding (Lightning Protection) (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 19:22:36 -0600
That wasn't me, but it's just another illustration of how misleading the SPG term can be. Many people were on the steep part of the learning curve around the time TTL and then Schottky logic appeared
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00206.html (10,820 bytes)

203. Re: [TowerTalk] W2DU Balun Bead Source (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:30:23 -0600
Well I guess if no one else is going to say it, I will. The reason your balun got hot is because you put in in series with your signal not in series with common mode currents. You can't put a balun o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00392.html (13,899 bytes)

204. Re: [TowerTalk] HTFA and Reality (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 08:08:11 -0600
HFTA gives incorrect gain for yagis stacked that close. The manual has a warning about yagis spaced closer than 1/2 wavelength. Jerry, K4SAV _______________________________________________ __________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00638.html (9,042 bytes)

205. Re: [TowerTalk] 80m vertical gain array (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:16:10 -0600
That water tower is going to be a major player in determining how any kind of vertical or sloping antenna is going to work. Without some very detailed analysis or measurements, anything you do is goi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00659.html (9,848 bytes)

206. Re: [TowerTalk] Greetings to all (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:39:26 -0600
These antennas aren't even in the same class. The 4 element SteppIR is the hands-down winner in all catagories except the price. Look closely at those gain specs for the X7. They are for the antenna
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00765.html (8,378 bytes)

207. Re: [TowerTalk] Greetings to all (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 19:55:04 -0600
..."I think that the difference between dbd and dbi is 2.1db."... True, and the difference between the free space gain, and the gain of a three element yagi at one wavelength height, is approximately
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00769.html (11,012 bytes)

208. Re: [TowerTalk] adding up wind loads (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 07:44:37 -0600
For some free software to make these calculations go to http://www.arrl.org/qexfiles/ and download the file labled TRANVITY.ZIP. Also download the following pdf file. http://www.arrl.org/qex/1123.pdf
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00008.html (8,895 bytes)

209. Re: [TowerTalk] 40 meter vertical ant (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 22:51:49 -0600
I think one of the advantages/disadvantages should be immediately obvious, you need an 80 ft plus tower to put up a 40 meter half wave vertical dipole. If you do put it on a tower, it will no longer
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00190.html (7,938 bytes)

210. Re: [TowerTalk] 40 meter vertical ant (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:46:12 -0600
You have a 66 foot tree (or wooden mast) from which you can properly hang a vertical dipole.".... A 66 wooden pole wouldn't do it, the bottom of the wire would be touching the ground. You could make
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00213.html (12,806 bytes)

211. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Software... (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:35:07 -0600
If you are thinking phased verticals, yes this is doable in a variety of ways. I hope you are not thinking two element Yagi. A two element 80 meter Yagi is a very large undertaking mechanically. Take
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00252.html (10,810 bytes)

212. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna Software... (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:50:23 -0600
..."There's an English NEC manual at http://www.nec2.org/. And, I'm pretty sure that 4nec2 has an English NEC manual file included in the distribution. The help file is certainly in English. It's fai
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00267.html (11,293 bytes)

213. Re: [TowerTalk] Current imbalance on 450 ohm Ladder Line (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:51:48 -0500
Sounds like it's time to check the calibration of your MFJ-835. Assuming an imbalance, reversing the polarity of the output terminals should simply show the same reading but on opposite channels. Rev
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00258.html (10,197 bytes)

214. Re: [TowerTalk] Current imbalance on 450 ohm Ladder Line (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 02:32:33 -0500
I agree with your conclusions Dan, and with your first explanation. Since you got me on that one, just for the sake of argument, I will pick on your last statement. ..."I think the meter is fine. The
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00266.html (9,815 bytes)

215. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 and stacking questions (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:07:32 -0500
Both of these parameters require some consideration when modeling stacks in HFTA. Since HFTA does not model mutual coupling between antennas, close spacing (less than 1/2 wavelength) produces optimis
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00453.html (12,815 bytes)

216. Re: [TowerTalk] Ladder line suggestions? (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 23:39:01 -0500
Lightning protection for a dipole fed with ladderline (also called window line, or window line sold under the name Ladderline) is somewhat problematic if it takes a direct hit. The problem is that if
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-04/msg00386.html (10,379 bytes)

217. Re: [TowerTalk] HY-GAIN BN86 (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:34:36 -0500
Read this. http://www.k1ttt.net/technote/airbalun.html _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-04/msg00411.html (7,082 bytes)

218. Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding, redux (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 17:38:06 -0500
W2IRT asked: Questions: 1) How far below ground should I run these wires? I'm just using hand-tools to trench, not a ditch-witch, so the plan was about 3 or 4 inches. You can get a little help from c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00206.html (13,212 bytes)

219. Re: [TowerTalk] What relay do Ameritron and Array Solutions use intheir coax switchs? (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 01:49:35 -0500
This doesn't answer your question, but maybe it will be of some use. Last time I was at Ameritron I noticed some small relays they were using on many of the RF amp boards to switch RF, and I got the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00222.html (10,366 bytes)

220. Re: [TowerTalk] Driving ground rods in rocky soil (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 17:02:03 -0500
Just bury a few strips of copper flashing just under the surface. All you need for a K9AY loop is about 200 ohms ground resistance. Jerry, K4SAV _______________________________________________ ______
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00533.html (9,743 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu