Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:RadioIR@charter.net: 445 ]

Total 445 documents matching your query.

361. Re: [TowerTalk] Unique Inv L...Help! (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2009 15:59:10 -0600
One more note about feeding the Cobra as a T on 160. To do this you will probably need two sets of feedlines, and a switch box out by the radial system. You could use open wire to feed the Cobra, and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00022.html (12,711 bytes)

362. Re: [TowerTalk] Unique Inv L...Help! (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 13:40:16 -0600
The problem with end feeding a half wave wire on 160 (in this case configured as an L) is that most people who operate 160 soon discover that you need an amplifier. That translates into big voltages
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00035.html (11,129 bytes)

363. Re: [TowerTalk] what size wire for kilowatt TX ?? (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 22:00:15 -0600
..."I'm not buying that! Current flow depends on impedance, R+jX, not radiation resistance."..... Ah, but it's confusing. For a short vertical that is not tuned to resonance, if the source is a volta
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00062.html (12,266 bytes)

364. Re: [TowerTalk] what size wire for kilowatt TX ?? (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 02:14:57 -0600
Martin wrote: ..."When I said a short vertical, I meant electrically short, i.e. << one wavelength (and also << 1/4 wavelength). Such a monopole above a ground plane always presents a high impedance,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00067.html (10,711 bytes)

365. Re: [TowerTalk] what size wire for kilowatt TX ?? (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 09:40:03 -0600
G3TXQ wrote: I don't know of any programme that will calculate the voltages and currents - I just did it the "hard way" with Smith Chart and a pocket calculator EZNEC will give it to you. To get the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00077.html (9,208 bytes)

366. Re: [TowerTalk] 160m project (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:46:46 -0600
Lee Here are a few items to consider about your planned 160 antenna. Warning: This post is long and has a lot of detail which may bore some of the readers, but I'm sure Lee will be interested. Lee sa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00200.html (12,553 bytes)

367. Re: [TowerTalk] 160 dipole? (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 02:14:24 -0600
Wrong question. There is no best antenna for 160. I can give you a link to a construction project for a three element 160 meter Yagi if that would interest you. You would then need a four element Yag
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00219.html (10,423 bytes)

368. Re: [TowerTalk] Relay lightening protection (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:04:07 -0600
Across relay coils I recommend using a zener rated at at least 3 watts and preferable at more than that. Look for one with a high current surge rating. The reason being that lightning can sometimes i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00413.html (9,857 bytes)

369. Re: [TowerTalk] Relay lightening protection (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 09:47:56 -0600
WR8K wrote: Are diodes across the relay coils necessary? And if so, how can I detect a failed diode (a short, correct?) before turning on the power? I answered the first part of that with my first po
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00003.html (9,547 bytes)

370. Re: [TowerTalk] 43' Vertical - Feed Point Tuner or Shack Tuner? (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 10:09:09 -0600
Here is an article that should answer your question: http://www.vk1od.net/multibandunloadedvertical/index.htm Also notice the paragraphs about the balun used in some of these antennas. Here is a link
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00005.html (9,106 bytes)

371. Re: [TowerTalk] Pipe yield strength? (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:39:25 -0600
Here is some data from one supplier. This might be good if you know exactly what type of pipe you are buying. http://www.hollaender.com/files/1/Tech_Data/handraildesign.pdf Jerry, K4SAV _____________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00082.html (8,015 bytes)

372. Re: [TowerTalk] 43' Vertical - Feed Point Tuner or Shack Tuner? (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:54:48 -0600
Feedline radiation is the same way that the TAC antenna gets an SWR of 1.0 on 40 meters from an antenna that has a feedpoint impedance close to 5 ohms. It appears your Zero Five conclusions are corre
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00116.html (12,033 bytes)

373. Re: [TowerTalk] 43 foot vertical feed (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2009 11:14:34 -0600
K8RYU wrote: "A couple comments. First off, the thing can be tuned from the shack with an "unbalanced openwire" feed, simply a wire carefully insulated from earth with, ideally, a number of parallel
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00177.html (9,886 bytes)

374. Re: [TowerTalk] 43' verticals (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:13:15 -0600
Here is your answer: http://www.vk1od.net/antenna/multibandunloadedvertical/index.htm Jerry, K4SAV _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Towe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00421.html (7,467 bytes)

375. Re: [TowerTalk] 43' vertical mod for true resonance on 80M (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:01:53 -0600
The characteristics of the cap you need to tune an inverted L to resonance on 160 has a lot to do with the shape of the antenna. In some cases the cap may be very large value, have a fairly low volta
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00471.html (11,240 bytes)

376. Re: [TowerTalk] 120' 160m vertical (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:53:22 -0600
I would expect that 120 of Rohn 45 with a three element 40 meter Yagi on top to be resonant somewhere around 1.6 MHz. Since it is so tall, if you match it with a series cap, the feedpoint impedance w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00489.html (11,270 bytes)

377. Re: [TowerTalk] 120' 160m vertical (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 19:00:22 -0600
I just threw together a quick model, and it looks like my estimate was too high on the feedpoint impedance. It should be close enough to 50 ohms that a single cap should do it. Resonant frequency was
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00490.html (12,421 bytes)

378. Re: [TowerTalk] Brick wall filters (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 10:55:43 -0600
You can whip one up very quickly with Elsie. It's a free program and very simple to use. Get it here along with some other good stuff on this page: http://www.tonnesoftware.com/index.html The freebie
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00662.html (7,520 bytes)

379. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Bandwidth of a 75/80 meter dipole (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:54:35 -0500
There are several ways to make a dipole cover all of 75/80 meters, and also many ways that don't work. A double Bazooka doesn't cut it. It only provides about 14% increase in bandwidth at the expense
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00472.html (9,716 bytes)

380. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical in pond (score: 1)
Author: K4SAV <RadioIR@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:05:29 -0500
N3OX wrote: An important thing for the original poster: the lake has to be very large for this to work,............... Also it has to be very deep. Those gain numbers you got from EZNEC assume an inf
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00473.html (11,380 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu