Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Ray@w9ray.org: 85 ]

Total 85 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [VHFcontesting] "Portable" (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 17:37:00 -0600
I really fail to see the problem... portable or permanent.. almost like black and white.. or night...and day... portable (pr't-bl, pr'-) adj. 1. capable of being transported or conveyed: a portable s
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-03/msg00025.html (7,512 bytes)

22. Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS Comment (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 19:16:27 -0600
you cannot use regular aprs on 144.390.. because it uses repeaters.. (digipeaters) and internet relays.. I don't see how it would be considered illegal to use regular simplex packet using the same so
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-03/msg00026.html (9,521 bytes)

23. Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS Comment (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 19:43:31 -0600
yeah, but you are using the internet and repeaters to solicit contacts.... kinda... W9RAY Ray J _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-03/msg00031.html (11,067 bytes)

24. Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS Comment (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 20:47:29 -0600
i would not think so.. according to the arrl ** Self-spotting is the practice of announcing your own call and run frequency on the spotting network... which is illegal according to general rules the
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-03/msg00034.html (14,066 bytes)

25. Re: [VHFcontesting] ts2000 and vhf2000 (Joe Barnes) (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 21:45:34 -0600
do you have it set up in the menu right..?. it looks like you have to set 28a and 28b to a on (1 or 2) position.. you are using pin 2 and ground of the EXT Cont. for 6 meters amp? and pin 2 and 4 of
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-03/msg00059.html (12,929 bytes)

26. Re: [VHFcontesting] 847 comments (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 02:36:22 -0500
At our TCRA field day site over the last few years we have operated with various radios, including a ft-920, ft-847's and regular IC-746's and the 847's always seemed to be next to useless on any ope
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-03/msg00102.html (15,523 bytes)

27. Re: [VHFcontesting] Stacking Question (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:34:20 -0500
this is for 903 and 1296.. "half the boom length" is not a very good idea with bands where the wave length is normally measured in centimeters .. also he could have a 5 element with a 12" boom.. or a
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-03/msg00110.html (9,675 bytes)

28. Re: [VHFcontesting] question about 50.125 use (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 17:58:39 -0500
this should be subject: too close to to qsos in progress.... I would try to get farther than 2.5 kc way from someone.. The average Joes radio have pretty poor 2.4 - 2.8khz ssb filters.. The grouch/ca
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-06/msg00053.html (11,618 bytes)

29. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover Antenna (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:46:10 -0500
M2 makes very nice stuff.. puts Cushraft stuff to shame... (in my book anyway) Don't forget, Dave over at Directive Systems inc. also makes decent antennas.. http://www.directivesystems.com/DSFO432-1
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00076.html (8,936 bytes)

30. Re: [VHFcontesting] One Missing Rover (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 17:56:11 -0500
What rule/s prevent you from roving now? Why was it worth the effort before? I'm sure inquiring minds would like to know.. Ray J W9RAY _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting ma
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-08/msg00024.html (8,172 bytes)

31. Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS and Contesting (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 21:07:42 -0500
I fail to see how transmitting your call and latitude and longitude data is self spotting.. You are not transmitting your rx/tx frequency.. or any qso information... ect... the only thing you are tra
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-08/msg00111.html (10,340 bytes)

32. Re: [VHFcontesting] DC Power Distribution (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 17:39:50 -0500
what are you talking about? did you read the article?? /The report it says the /Avestor battery's are in all likely hood better than other battery's that they could have used.. /"After one of our net
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-08/msg00238.html (10,151 bytes)

33. Re: [VHFcontesting] cherry picking (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 00:10:26 -0600
I think that the limited-multi class should be akin to a "beginners" multi op.. You could get some "big gun" multi op station that scores huge numbers on their bottom bands.. but know they are not go
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-12/msg00026.html (6,823 bytes)

34. Re: [VHFcontesting] Roving rules questions (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 18:05:44 -0600
It sounds like there is now a rover class that is really a movable ( multi grid square) unlimited multi op class .... _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcon
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-12/msg00043.html (10,105 bytes)

35. Re: [VHFcontesting] Another rookie question (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 16:52:15 -0600
I have never seen any rules, for any contest, that say "when" you have to "log" your qso... What, is it better that someone crashes and burns trying to log, Because some "real ham" is afraid of somet
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-12/msg00165.html (11,018 bytes)

36. Re: [VHFcontesting] Dumb question about Mirage amp (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2008 14:43:48 -0600
The B-310 is marketed as a hand held amplifier... 250 mW to 8 watts max input =100 watts out. This is the CW or FM rating only... You Can Not run this amplifier at 100 watts on ssb, this amp will onl
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00031.html (9,204 bytes)

37. Re: [VHFcontesting] DC injector for ICOM preamp? (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 00:49:46 -0600
Tim make sure of the rated rf power input for your model preamp.. I thought some were just made for the 10 watt radios like the ic-451a also note.. the Icom sends 12 volts down the coax during receiv
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00037.html (8,427 bytes)

38. Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS Protocols for SS 08? (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:30:59 -0600
Thats an nice interface.. Weird thought that it puts me 1700 feet or so off where I actually am.. The cross hairs display the proper lat/lon where my house is and what data I am TXing .. But it is di
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00088.html (9,701 bytes)

39. Re: [VHFcontesting] Negative comments (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 11:34:06 -0600
so&middot;lic&middot;it (s-lst) v. so&middot;lic&middot;it&middot;ed, so&middot;lic&middot;it&middot;ing, so&middot;lic&middot;its v.tr. 1. To seek to obtain by persuasion, entreaty, or formal applic
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00289.html (8,734 bytes)

40. Re: [VHFcontesting] My rover antenna upgrade plan (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:30:15 -0600
Remember EMT conduit is "made" to be bent easily.. 1" x 10 feet long is easily taco'd by hand 1" usually has less than a 1/16th inch wall. but if you are only going to have 4.5 feet of it out with a
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-02/msg00004.html (11,088 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu