Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:RedHaines@centurytel.net: 200 ]

Total 200 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [TowerTalk] Porcupines on commercial towers and stuff (score: 1)
Author: Red <RedHaines@centurytel.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 12:58:28 -0600
I enjoy the chuckle! Is there a preferred direction toward which the golfer should face? 73 de WO&Oslash;W : -) _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Sel
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00639.html (8,662 bytes)

122. [TowerTalk] Tilting a tower (score: 1)
Author: Red <RedHaines@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 02 May 2005 09:25:09 -0500
Good Morning, Stew and TTs; Thank you for your post. It appears you implement the foldover or tilt function similarly, but perhaps better in some ways, than I do. I would enjoy seeing more details if
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00019.html (9,098 bytes)

123. Re: [TowerTalk] Short Ground Rods?? (score: 1)
Author: Red <RedHaines@centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 10:23:14 -0500
When considering grounding systems, do not overlook two major categories: soil characteristics and characteristics of the energies you are trying to ground. Important soil characteristics are conduct
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00541.html (9,308 bytes)

124. Re: [TowerTalk] Short Ground Rods?? (score: 1)
Author: Red <RedHaines@centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 14:03:57 -0500
Neither the series nor the parallel model is correct, except at one frequency. At any one frequency, one is equivalent to the other, with proper adjustment of the values. I suggest the parallel model
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00557.html (8,900 bytes)

125. Re: [TowerTalk] Short Ground Rods?? (score: 1)
Author: Red <RedHaines@centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 19:29:17 -0500
Hi, Jim; Are you referring to the measurement method published by George Hagn? Are all the necessary details in the more recent Antenna Books? My 19th, 15th, and 13the editionsoffer only a general de
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00561.html (9,747 bytes)

126. Re: [TowerTalk] Rigging Dipoles and Growing Old (score: 1)
Author: Red <RedHaines@centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 14:04:56 -0500
Hi, Lee; Great question, and I look forward to seeing the responses. I plan a similar installation. one of my thoughts, subject to the responses we see, it to support the coax on another line fastene
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00146.html (11,717 bytes)

127. Re: [TowerTalk] CQ article error(?) (score: 1)
Author: Red <RedHaines@centurytel.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 12:07:21 -0500
I believe the single point ground is to hold all equipment grounds at a common potential; so that there is no potential or voltage between any two component grounds. Short and minimally inductive con
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00281.html (9,426 bytes)

128. Re: [TowerTalk] Sudden shifts in shunt matching network? (score: 1)
Author: Red <RedHaines@centurytel.net>
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 17:13:38 -0600
Hello to Bill and All; I'll share a professional experience from the 1960s, in which tuned modules used in a system that the firm I worked for produced exhibited erratic frequency shifts. I found tha
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00089.html (12,144 bytes)

129. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower base rebar (score: 1)
Author: Red <RedHaines@centurytel.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 10:11:58 -0600
The Universal Towers base consists of steel legs with locking crossmembers (excuse my nomenclature) near the bottom and top of the base so that those legs mostly load the concrete in compression in e
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00673.html (7,863 bytes)

130. [TowerTalk] Elevated guys (score: 1)
Author: Red <RedHaines@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 17:33:00 -0600
Civil engineering handbooks, available at many public libraries, provide guidance on permissible bending loads on structural members of many shapes. Those same handbooks define slender columns and pr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00203.html (8,568 bytes)

131. Re: [TowerTalk] Building Antennas (score: 1)
Author: Red <RedHaines@centurytel.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 19:55:49 -0600
Hi, Bob; You may find that computerized design has given us better optimized antennas, especially of the more complex antennas such as Yagis. Very slight modifications give us trade offs of bandwidth
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00297.html (8,327 bytes)

132. Re: [TowerTalk] Re-Bar Cage Advise (score: 1)
Author: Red <RedHaines@centurytel.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 21:58:17 -0600
Hi, TTrs; The cage must withstand the forces of concrete flowing around it during the pour. It must also be prevented from moving during the pour. Flowing concrete pushes real hard! I built my cage o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00415.html (9,397 bytes)

133. [TowerTalk] Vertical Antennas (score: 1)
Author: Red <RedHaines@centurytel.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 12:39:30 -0600
Hi, Lee; Base loaded verticals work, of course. It may be easier to lower the losses associated with short antennas with top loading, such as the "T" or the inverted L. Top hats work well, too, but t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00519.html (7,799 bytes)

134. Re: [TowerTalk] Masting (score: 1)
Author: Red <RedHaines@centurytel.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 17:01:54 -0600
The center of a 'temporary' dipole here is supported on 35' of Radio Shack steel mast. The antenna elements support it in one plane and two guys support it in a plane perpendicular to that. The guys
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00542.html (7,696 bytes)

135. Re: [TowerTalk] 30 Meter Propagation (score: 1)
Author: Red <RedHaines@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 14:46:20 -0600
Hi Lee; I've been recording the critical frequency, F2, (foF2) for nearly a year, hourly. MUF is approximately equal to foF2 times the secant of the take off angle, where the foF2 is the value at the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00620.html (8,207 bytes)

136. [TowerTalk] Welding rebar (score: 1)
Author: Red <RedHaines@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 14:47:30 -0600
Following is information I received from Hank Lonberg, S.E.,P.E. / KR7X, Lonberg Design Group about rebar grades and welding. 73 de WO&Oslash;W Here is a url to a PDF from the CRSI (concrete reinforc
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00621.html (7,726 bytes)

137. Re: [TowerTalk] Radial wire and antenna spacing (score: 1)
Author: Red <RedHaines@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 15:40:17 -0600
The suggestion to look for copper salvaged from a motor or a power transformer is a good one. I happened upon a few thousand feet, continuous, from a power transformer. Several hams report using stee
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00625.html (7,410 bytes)

138. Re: [TowerTalk] Radial wire and antenna spacing (score: 1)
Author: Red <RedHaines@centurytel.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 22:10:43 -0600
A couple responses mentioned that the steel may last only a few years. I mentioned that I have read of using electric fence wire only to suggest it as an inexpensive alternative to copper. I suspect,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-01/msg00633.html (8,910 bytes)

139. Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding a vertical (score: 1)
Author: Red <RedHaines@centurytel.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 09:59:52 -0600
Greetings, TowerTalkers; Regarding spark gaps and shunting static and lightning transients from vertical antennas: I refer you to "Lightning: Physics and Effects," by Vladimir Rakov and Martin Uman,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-03/msg00547.html (10,945 bytes)

140. Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding a vertical (score: 1)
Author: Red <RedHaines@centurytel.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:27:16 -0600
Hi, Gene; I agree that the informed ham should read ICE's material. The informed ham should also read PolyPhaser's Tech Notes and the book PP publishes. The informed ham must also recognize some bias
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-03/msg00549.html (12,450 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu