Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Rick@dj0ip.de: 755 ]

Total 755 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] balun noise? (score: 1)
Author: "Rick, NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 09:36:27 -0600
Hi Denton, Not sure why you are experiencing that, but more important, why are you even trying to work with a balun? This is an unbalanced antenna. I suggest you follow the design of the 160m version
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00466.html (10,898 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI and non TT Amp (score: 1)
Author: "Rick, NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 18:38:15 -0600
Chas, I am not familiar with the internal layout of the AL 811A amp. When running a continuous duty cycle mode, I would be sure that the power supply's electrolytic capacitors get enough cooling (i.e
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00192.html (12,241 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI and non TT Amp (score: 1)
Author: "Rick, NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 20:36:41 -0600
Rick The better reliability of the 572's is not just a "perceived" improvement. The 572's have about twice the plate dissipation of the 811a's and they were designed to run at a much higher plate vol
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00174.html (10,033 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Omni-VI plus question (score: 1)
Author: "Rick, NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 21:05:00 -0600
I did a firmware update once, but I can't remember if it was on my VI or my VI+. In any case there definitely was one once. 73 Rick Henry, As far as I know, the firmware version doesn't make any diff
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00148.html (9,281 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] OMIN VII (score: 1)
Author: "Rick, NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 20:36:09 -0600
I agree on the SGC500, Denny. It is probably the best thing going in its class, now that Henry has ceased making their SS series of amps. Though not built as well, I would prefer the SS-750 HF over t
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00144.html (9,947 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] OMIN VII (score: 1)
Author: "Rick, NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2007 21:15:25 -0600
SGC is just a small niche player in the market. It also looks like Elecraft is set to emerge as another important U.S. player, now that the K3 is shipping. I would rank them much higher than SGC in i
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00132.html (9,066 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Titan III (score: 1)
Author: "Rick, NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 14:36:10 -0500
I agree, plus, if you prefer to run barefoot most of the time, which I do, then you want to be running the transceiver's 100w. If you need the power, then it is nice to: - turn it on and have it func
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-11/msg00061.html (10,294 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI & QRO HF2000 (score: 1)
Author: "Rick, NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 21:09:48 -0500
Very funny that nobody else replied. On the other hand, not many people have ever had a QRO Technologies Amp. I've had 2 of them. Gud Luk. 73 Rick Thanks for the reply Rick ... ur the only one that r
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00525.html (10,569 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI & QRO HF2000 (score: 1)
Author: "Rick, NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 07:35:15 -0500
Dwight, I used the combination for about 8 years. I actually had both the HF-2000 and the HF-1000 (same as HF-2000, but with just one 3-500z), and a pair of OMNI VI's. Lovely amps and VERY FAST T/R w
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00478.html (8,329 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Purpose of 250 Hz 8 pole filters (score: 1)
Author: "Rick, NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:42:53 -0500
Anyone who feels 250 Hz filters are unnecessary should try contesting on 40m in Europe, where the entire band is just 100 kHz wide (though it's in process of expanding now). I regularly ran both 250
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00423.html (10,350 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] Receive Audio Mod from INRAD (score: 1)
Author: "Rick, NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 22:11:15 -0500
Well actually it is more like 10 or 15 years ago. I bought it so long ago that I can no longer remember. Rick, NJ0IP Check the archives - this was discussed plenty back when it came out (2 or 3 years
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00402.html (8,370 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Omni-V TR problem (score: 1)
Author: "Rick, NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:47:18 -0500
Ralph, Do you have a linear amplifier between the transceiver and the antenna? This is the typical problem you get when the T/R relay contacts inside the amplifier are burnt. You fix it by burnishing
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00354.html (8,078 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI+ (563 opt.3) 4SALE (score: 1)
Author: "Rick, NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 20:48:37 -0500
Well, the reflector formatting played "H" with my formatting. Should have done it in pure ASCII. I am selling the entire package for $1600. My best estimate is that a refurbished equivalent package f
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00138.html (10,371 bytes)

14. [TenTec] OMNI VI+ (563 opt.3) 4SALE (score: 1)
Author: "Rick, NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 20:36:20 -0500
Omni VI+ (563 opt.3) for sale: PLEASE ANSWER OFF REFLECTOR. Simply click: Rick@DJ0IP.de to send me an email. The rig is located here in Oklahoma City. Prefer to ship to CONUS. Others may enquire and
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-10/msg00136.html (9,482 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] Some Argonauts (score: 1)
Author: "Rick, NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 20:38:13 -0500
Steve, Both radios are great QRP rigs, and collector items. I've had a 505, then 509, and now 515. These radio's have pretty hot receivers, but only a 4-pole SSB filter in the IF chain. The proper us
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-09/msg00446.html (9,317 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] price of used Omni VI (score: 1)
Author: "Rick, NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 22:44:54 -0500
I guess that means once that Omni VI checks out, it can never leave ;-) Well...it was new in the box... and the buyer is Joe Walsh. Royalties sure are a good thing! __________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-09/msg00338.html (7,375 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] Amplifier Question (score: 1)
Author: "Rick, NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:52:43 -0500
I operated my Omni V, Omni VI, and Omni VI+ with the Ameritron AL-80A, which is pretty much identical to the SB-1000 linear. It worked great on SSB, but initially I had a lot of trouble with arcing r
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-08/msg00425.html (8,079 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] AL-811 amp integration with Omni V (score: 1)
Author: "Rick, NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 21:32:38 -0500
Another possibility is that the Omni V is set up to key using the transistor and the transistor might be blown (happens when you key an old amp with high negative voltage keying). If so, it's about a
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-08/msg00066.html (8,840 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter vs Omni VII (score: 1)
Author: "Rick, NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:58:43 -0500
YES, significantly better (in favor of the O7). Planning to replace my Icom 718 with one of these, wondering whether added $1k cost of the Omni VII warranted. I have no plans to remotely control, is
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00157.html (7,825 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Rick, NJ0IP / DJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 23:00:33 -0500
There is no single right answer to the question. Saw already a couple of good recommendations, but, if you only want to support the ends of the dipole, I would go with the cheep Kevlar stuff from Rad
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-07/msg00086.html (8,349 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]

This search system is powered by Namazu