Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:SPELUNK.SUENO@prodigy.net: 242 ]

Total 242 documents matching your query.

101. [Towertalk] Sixpak (and other) antenna relay problems (score: 1)
Author: SPELUNK.SUENO@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR)
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 10:38:17 -0400
TT: FWIW - When I purchased a used (excuse me - pre-owned) RCB-5 antenna switch, I had to replace a few of the LEDs. Upon opening the control box, I noticed that there was a RS bridge rectifier pack
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00298.html (7,366 bytes)

102. [Towertalk] 'Toes' of a tower concrete base (score: 1)
Author: SPELUNK.SUENO@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR)
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 18:34:48 -0400
Gary: I agree with Randy AC7NJ: Don't abitrarily change the engineer's design for the foundation. If I understand your suggestion, you are asking if it would be OK simply to dig out the foundation to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00496.html (15,043 bytes)

103. [Towertalk] 'Toes' of a tower concrete base (score: 1)
Author: SPELUNK.SUENO@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR)
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 22:32:24 -0400
Dave et al: My responses below. 73 de Gene Smar AD3F --Original Message-- From: David Jordan <wa3gin@erols.com> To: EUGENE SMAR <SPELUNK.SUENO@prodigy.net> Cc: ac7nj@bentonrea.com <ac7nj@bentonrea.co
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00505.html (11,152 bytes)

104. [Towertalk] 'Toes' of a tower concrete base (score: 1)
Author: SPELUNK.SUENO@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR)
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 00:37:16 -0400
Dave et al: My response below (again.) 73 de Gene Smar AD3F --Original Message-- From: David Jordan <wa3gin@erols.com> To: EUGENE SMAR <SPELUNK.SUENO@prodigy.net> Cc: ac7nj@bentonrea.com <ac7nj@bento
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00509.html (10,328 bytes)

105. [Towertalk] Tower toes - correction (score: 1)
Author: SPELUNK.SUENO@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR)
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 01:41:10 -0400
TT: I want to apologize to the list for having sent erroneous information in my posting on tower foundation toes. I said I believed the foundation design was called pier and column. It's actually cal
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-06/msg00511.html (6,720 bytes)

106. [Towertalk] Lightning Protection by Ron Block in QST! (score: 1)
Author: SPELUNK.SUENO@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR)
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 10:31:29 -0400
TT: Speaking of lightning and Polyphasers, I've often wondered about the use of PL259's with lightning suppressors/arrestors. I've seen it written on this reflector numerous times that one should not
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00352.html (10,119 bytes)

107. [Towertalk] Lightning Protection - Conclusion (for me, anyway) (score: 1)
Author: SPELUNK.SUENO@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR)
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 20:00:10 -0400
TT: Thanks for the opinions and anecdotes regarding lightning protection or lack thereof. Much appreciated. My original query (Must I ground the coax shield ahead of the Polyphaser suppressor?) is on
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00369.html (8,523 bytes)

108. [Towertalk] Lightning Protection - Conclusion (for me, anyway) (score: 1)
Author: SPELUNK.SUENO@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR)
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 11:33:13 -0400
Steve: Thanks for pointing that out - commercial installations using a shield ground lead just before the suppressor outside the building. I don't recall seeing an instruction sheet with the Polyphas
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00392.html (10,354 bytes)

109. [Towertalk] Lightning Protection - Conclusion (for me, anyway) (score: 1)
Author: SPELUNK.SUENO@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR)
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 20:29:37 -0400
TT: Sorry for rolling a grenade under the tent and walking away! I haven't responded to any of the postings on this subject for a few days, even though I think I started the discussion on soldered gr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00434.html (11,857 bytes)

110. [Towertalk] Grounding mast to tower (score: 1)
Author: SPELUNK.SUENO@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR)
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 14:29:47 -0500
TT: My Bencher Skyhawk used to have all-insulated elements, too. Before I put it on the tower I used a small aluminum strap (maybe 1/2 inch by five inches), self-tapping screw and SS hose clamp (plus
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00116.html (10,262 bytes)

111. [Towertalk] Grounding mast to tower (score: 1)
Author: SPELUNK.SUENO@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR)
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 22:47:46 -0500
TT: Also, with an engineer, the cup half-empty, half-full metaphor actually means that the cup was twice as big as necessary. Have a nice day de Gene Smar AD3F BSEE P.E.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00155.html (9,407 bytes)

112. [Towertalk] falling from my tower (score: 1)
Author: SPELUNK.SUENO@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR)
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 20:02:18 -0400
"Accidents happen."? No such thing, either in a car on on a tower! I recently fell off a step ladder in my garage retrieving a few variable caps for my gamma match on 160M. Held onto the box with bot
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00438.html (9,993 bytes)

113. [Towertalk] 620/340 (score: 1)
Author: SPELUNK.SUENO@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR)
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 11:12:02 -0400
TT: Hose clamps + TAPE = no snags + no corrosion. I did the clamp-plus-tape thing on my D40 element (four clamps on both halves) as well as on the clamps that secure the aluminum straps that short my
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00493.html (8,375 bytes)

114. [Towertalk] covering unused PL259 ? de n9vv (score: 1)
Author: SPELUNK.SUENO@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR)
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 14:07:23 -0400
TAPE. 73 de Gene Smar AD3F --Original Message-- From: WA2BPE <wa2bpe@exotrope.net> To: khopper@uchicago.edu <khopper@uchicago.edu> Cc: towertalk <towertalk@contesting.com> To: <towertalk@contesting.c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00594.html (10,577 bytes)

115. [Towertalk] Cable purchase source info requested (score: 1)
Author: SPELUNK.SUENO@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR)
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 22:21:12 -0400
Dave K0QE (the originator of this thread): I concur with everyone's recommendation on the PVC conduit, but make it bigger than you think you'll need initially. Being hams, we inevitably WILL change s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00622.html (11,301 bytes)

116. [Towertalk] Cable purchase source info requested (score: 1)
Author: SPELUNK.SUENO@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR)
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 23:57:59 -0400
TT: Sorry for the confusing posting. To clear things up - my response, directed at K0QE's original posting, was to agree with Jerry's and Mark's recommendations to use PVC conduit, rather than hard-t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00628.html (14,932 bytes)

117. [Towertalk] Book? (score: 1)
Author: SPELUNK.SUENO@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR)
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 10:16:19 -0400
George: It's not really a paper BOOK, but close enough - Mark N1LO has compiled a very extensive set of "things to worry about" when building and maintaining a tower. The URL I had doesn't seem to wo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg01088.html (7,583 bytes)

118. [Towertalk] Shunt-feeding Trylon on 80/160 (score: 1)
Author: SPELUNK.SUENO@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR)
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 16:49:06 -0400
TT: Finally! This afternoon I managed to load the Trylon tower on 80M using the method I described previously for 160M (a' la K1ZM), but with a twist. But the BW on 80 is not as great as on 160. Here
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg01121.html (9,746 bytes)

119. [Towertalk] Lightning Safety Week (?) (score: 1)
Author: SPELUNK.SUENO@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR)
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 10:56:28 -0400
TT: Below is an excerpt from my local RACES's comm director's e-mail regarding Lightning Safety Week this week. FWIW. 73 de Gene Smar AD3F The National Weather Service will broadcast information on i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg01198.html (6,645 bytes)

120. [Towertalk] Shunt-feeding Trylon - update (score: 1)
Author: SPELUNK.SUENO@prodigy.net (EUGENE SMAR)
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 02:35:09 -0400
TT: A brief update: I worked a few local (US east coast) stations on 80M SSB over the past couple of days with my shunt-fed Trylon tower. Reports from most stations are 5-6 dB better (TX and RX) than
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg01219.html (6,676 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu